Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal

The Portuguese electricity mix is undergoing a significant shift away from the technologies that have dominated generation for the past decades. This article aims at assessing the environmental life-cycle impacts of electricity generation and supply in Portugal (PT), including: (i) modeling the main electricity generation systems; (ii) modeling the transmission and distribution (TD (iii) characterizing the evolution of the electricity sector in PT from 2003 to 2012; and (iv) discussing how the recent changes in the technology portfolio affected the environmental performance of the electricity generated and supplied. The life-cycle assessment methodology was used to quantify impacts in: non-renewable fossil energy demand (nREn), global warming (GW), abiotic depletion (AD), acidification (AC), eutrophication (ET), photochemical oxidation (PO) and ozone layer depletion (OD). From 2003 to 2012, an overall reduction of the environmental impacts was achieved. In particular, since 2008, electricity generation impacts in AC and PO dropped sharply as a result of the installation of desulphurization (62% reduction in AC; 74% reduction in PO) and denitrification (5% reduction in AC) systems in coal power plants (PP), as well as the phase out of large fuel oil PP. For NREn, AD and GW, the reduction of impacts was less pronounced (9–22% in the generation mix; 14–22% in the supply mix). T&D grid added 5–14% to the environmental impacts due to infrastructure (<5%) and T&D losses (5–9%). Despite the large increase in renewable capacity (especially wind) and the investments in lower-carbon fossil fuel technologies (natural gas), electricity generation still relies heavily on coal. There is, however, potential to further reduce environmental impacts in key categories (NREn, AD and GW) since there is significant available capacity of natural gas combined cycle currently underutilized.

[1]  Bin Chen,et al.  Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project—A dynamic LCA perspective , 2014 .

[2]  Xunmin Ou,et al.  Life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions for electricity generation and supply in China , 2011 .

[3]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Consequential environmental system analysis of expected offshore wind electricity production in Germany , 2008 .

[4]  Daniel Weisser,et al.  A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies , 2007 .

[5]  E. Martínez,et al.  LCA sensitivity analysis of a multi-megawatt wind turbine , 2010 .

[6]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mexico , 2011 .

[7]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[8]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  CO2 emissions attributed to annual average electricity consumption in OECD (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries , 2012 .

[9]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the Danish electricity distribution network , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review , 2008 .

[11]  A. Tillman,et al.  Normative ethics and methodology for life cycle assessment , 2005 .

[12]  Ana Margarida Santiago Lopes Coelho Gestão de cinzas produzidas em centrais de cogeração operadas com biomassa , 2010 .

[13]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[14]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 1: power lines and cables , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Varun,et al.  LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—A review , 2009 .

[16]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[17]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  C. Weber,et al.  Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know? , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Environmental evaluation of power transmission in Norway , 2013 .

[20]  Stefan Muench,et al.  A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments , 2013 .

[21]  Eric Hu,et al.  Life cycle assessment and evaluation of energy payback time on high-concentration photovoltaic power generation system , 2010 .

[22]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life-cycle assessment for energy analysis and management , 2007 .

[23]  P. Ciria,et al.  Centralised electricity production from winter cereals biomass grown under central-northern Spain conditions: Global warming and energy yield assessments , 2014 .

[24]  Luis F. Ochoa,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the transmission network in Great Britain , 2010 .

[25]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass , 2014 .

[26]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[27]  Roland Geyer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of overhead and underground primary power distribution. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Umberto Desideri,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a ground-mounted 1778 kWp photovoltaic plant and comparison with traditional energy production systems , 2012 .

[29]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants , 2008 .

[30]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[31]  G. Lewis,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of electricity generation in the province of Ontario, Canada , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[32]  Roberto Dones,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Energy Systems: Results for Current Systems in Switzerland and other UCTE Countries , 2007 .

[33]  Craig I. Jones,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of 11 kV electrical overhead lines and underground cables , 2010 .

[34]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 2: transformers and substation equipment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.