Scientometric Research Assessment of IEEE CSCWD Conference Proceedings: An Exploratory Analysis from 2001 to 2019

It has been a quarter of a century since the publication of the first edition of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) held in 1996 in Beijing, China. Despite some attempts to empirically examine the evolution and identity of the field of CSCW and its related communities and disciplines, the scarcity of scientometric studies on the IEEE CSCWD research productivity is noteworthy. To fill this gap, this study reports on an exploratory quantitative analysis of the literature published in the IEEE CSCWD conference proceedings with the purpose of visualizing and understanding its structure and evolution for the 2001–2019 period. The findings offer valuable insights into the paper and author distribution, country and citation-level productivity indicators, degree of collaboration, and collaboration index. Through this analysis we also expect to get an initial overview of the IEEE CSCWD conference concerning the main topics being presented, most cited papers, and variances in the number of keywords, full-text views, and references.

[1]  K. Subramanyam,et al.  Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review , 1983 .

[2]  M. Deakin,et al.  The First Two Decades of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2017 .

[3]  David M. Nichols,et al.  A scientometric analysis of 15 years of CHINZ conferences , 2015, CHINZ.

[4]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  20 Years of Four HCI Conferences: A Visual Exploration , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Hugo Paredes,et al.  Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW , 2017, Scientometrics.

[6]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  CHI 1994-2013: mapping two decades of intellectual progress through co-word analysis , 2014, CHI.

[7]  Michal Jacovi,et al.  The chasms of CSCW: a citation graph analysis of the CSCW conference , 2006, CSCW '06.

[8]  Daniel B. Horn,et al.  Six degrees of jonathan grudin: a social network analysis of the evolution and impact of CSCW research , 2004, CSCW.

[9]  Aakar Gupta,et al.  Five years of IndiaHCI: A Scientometric Analysis , 2015, IndiaHCI.

[10]  Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara,et al.  Industry 4.0 technologies basic network identification , 2019, Scientometrics.

[11]  Hugo Paredes,et al.  The Effect of Scientific Collaboration on CSCW Research: A Scientometric Study , 2019, 2019 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).

[12]  Christoph Bartneck The end of the beginning: a reflection on the first five years of the HRI conference , 2010, Scientometrics.

[13]  Mike J. Chantler,et al.  Is British HCI Important? A Topic-based Comparison with CHI , 2014, BCS HCI.

[14]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Radoslaw Nielek,et al.  Identifying breakthrough scientific papers , 2020, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Omar Mubin,et al.  Scientometric Analysis of the HAI Conference , 2017, HAI.

[17]  Yong Tang,et al.  The structure analysis of the CSCWD conference's collaboration network , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).

[18]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  A Review of CRIWG Research , 2010, CRIWG.

[19]  Herb Krasner CSCW '86 Conference summary report , 1987, SGCH.

[20]  Liaojun Pang,et al.  Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A review of theory and practice in scientometrics , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Bárbara S. Lancho-Barrantes,et al.  Science in Mexico: a bibliometric analysis , 2019, Scientometrics.

[23]  Jano Moreira de Souza,et al.  The future of work: Insights for CSCW , 2017, CSCWD.

[24]  Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa,et al.  What publications metadata tell us about the evolution of a scientific community: the case of the Brazilian human–computer interaction conference series , 2016, Scientometrics.

[25]  Omar Mubin,et al.  HCI down under: reflecting on a decade of the OzCHI conference , 2017, Scientometrics.

[26]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Proceedings literature as additional data source for bibliometric analysis , 2006, Scientometrics.

[27]  Jun Hu,et al.  Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings , 2009, CHI.