A Combination of Geographically Weighted Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, China

In this study, a novel coupling model for landslide susceptibility mapping is presented. In practice, environmental factors may have different impacts at a local scale in study areas. To provide better predictions, a geographically weighted regression (GWR) technique is firstly used in our method to segment study areas into a series of prediction regions with appropriate sizes. Meanwhile, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier is exploited in each prediction region for landslide susceptibility mapping. To further improve the prediction performance, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is used in the prediction regions to obtain optimal parameters for the SVM classifier. To evaluate the prediction performance of our model, several SVM-based prediction models are utilized for comparison on a study area of the Wanzhou district in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Experimental results, based on three objective quantitative measures and visual qualitative evaluation, indicate that our model can achieve better prediction accuracies and is more effective for landslide susceptibility mapping. For instance, our model can achieve an overall prediction accuracy of 91.10%, which is 7.8%–19.1% higher than the traditional SVM-based models. In addition, the obtained landslide susceptibility map by our model can demonstrate an intensive correlation between the classified very high-susceptibility zone and the previously investigated landslides.

[1]  Huiquan Bi,et al.  Modeling spatial variation in tree diameter–height relationships , 2004 .

[2]  Majid Shadman Roodposhti,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping using geographically-weighted principal component analysis , 2014 .

[3]  C. F. Lee,et al.  Landslide characteristics and, slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong , 2002 .

[4]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Spatial Nonstationarity and Autoregressive Models , 1998 .

[5]  L. Tham,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping based on Support Vector Machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China , 2008 .

[6]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers , 1999, Neural Processing Letters.

[7]  P. Reichenbach,et al.  Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy , 1999 .

[8]  José I. Barredo,et al.  Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Tirajana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain , 2000 .

[9]  Z. Pawlak,et al.  Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis , 1994 .

[10]  Cheng-Lung Huang,et al.  A distributed PSO-SVM hybrid system with feature selection and parameter optimization , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[11]  T. Nakaya Local Spatial Interaction Modelling Based on the Geographically Weighted Regression Approach , 2003 .

[12]  Marzena Kryszkiewicz,et al.  Rough Set Approach to Incomplete Information Systems , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Shiyou Xie,et al.  Geomorphic evolution of the Yangtze Gorges and the time of their formation , 2001 .

[14]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis , 2004 .

[15]  H. Wang,et al.  Rainfall‐induced landslide hazard assessment using artificial neural networks , 2006 .

[16]  Robert E. Tepel,et al.  Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation , 1998 .

[17]  T. Kavzoglu,et al.  Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela , 2005 .

[18]  X Yao,et al.  Application of two-class SVM applied in landslide susceptibility mapping , 2013 .

[19]  Xueling Wu,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: A case of the Three Gorges area, China , 2014 .

[20]  S. Kalogirou,et al.  Landslide susceptibility, Peloponnese Peninsula in South Greece , 2014 .

[21]  Yee Leung,et al.  A rough set approach to the discovery of classification rules in spatial data , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  G. Jenks The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping , 1967 .

[23]  B. Taner San,et al.  An evaluation of SVM using polygon-based random sampling in landslide susceptibility mapping: The Candir catchment area (western Antalya, Turkey) , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[24]  Philippa J. Mason,et al.  Landslide hazard assessment in the Three Gorges area of the Yangtze river using ASTER imagery: Zigui–Badong , 2004 .

[26]  Martin Charlton,et al.  The Geography of Parameter Space: An Investigation of Spatial Non-Stationarity , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.

[28]  Xin Pan,et al.  A variable precision rough set approach to the remote sensing land use/cover classification , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[29]  L. Ayalew,et al.  The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan , 2005 .

[30]  John H. Holland,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and the Optimal Allocation of Trials , 1973, SIAM J. Comput..

[31]  Bijan Davvaz,et al.  Roughness based on fuzzy ideals , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Peter Willett,et al.  What is a tutorial , 2013 .

[33]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[34]  A. Stewart Fotheringham,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression: A Method for Exploring Spatial Nonstationarity , 2010 .

[35]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[36]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  Discerning landslide susceptibility using rough sets , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[37]  D. Mercier,et al.  Focusing on the spatial non-stationarity of landslide predisposing factors in northern Iceland , 2014 .

[38]  Kuangrong Hao,et al.  The Bi-Directional Prediction of Carbon Fiber Production Using a Combination of Improved Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine , 2014, Materials.

[39]  Shunde Yin,et al.  Geomechanical parameters identification by particle swarm optimization and support vector machine , 2009 .

[40]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[41]  Netra R. Regmi,et al.  Assessing susceptibility to landslides: Using models to understand observed changes in slopes , 2010 .

[42]  Jungho Im,et al.  Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review , 2011 .

[43]  Cristiano Ballabio,et al.  Support Vector Machines for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Staffora River Basin Case Study, Italy , 2012, Mathematical Geosciences.

[44]  Shengwu Qin,et al.  Geo-hazard Initiation and Assessment in the Three Gorges Reservoir , 2009 .

[45]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[46]  John C. Davis,et al.  Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA , 2003 .

[47]  O. Weck,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION AND THE GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2005 .

[48]  Ross K. Meentemeyer,et al.  Automated mapping of conformity between topographic and geological surfaces , 2000 .

[49]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  Rule extraction from support vector machines: A review , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[50]  M. Matteucci,et al.  Artificial neural networks and cluster analysis in landslide susceptibility zonation , 2008 .

[51]  A. Erener,et al.  Improvement of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping by using spatial and global regression methods in the case of More and Romsdal (Norway) , 2010 .

[52]  Saro Lee,et al.  Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network , 2003 .

[53]  Manfred M. Fischer,et al.  Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications , 2010 .

[54]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough Sets: A Tutorial , 1998 .

[55]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships , 2002 .

[56]  K. Thangavel,et al.  Dimensionality reduction based on rough set theory: A review , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[57]  Chong Xu,et al.  GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China , 2012 .

[58]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Measuring Spatial Variations in Relationships with Geographically Weighted Regression , 1997 .

[59]  Bo Du,et al.  Landslide spatial susceptibility mapping by using GIS and remote sensing techniques: a case study in Zigui County, the Three Georges reservoir, China , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[60]  Fu Ren,et al.  Application of wavelet analysis and a particle swarm-optimized support vector machine to predict the displacement of the Shuping landslide in the Three Gorges, China , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[61]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[62]  S. Wan,et al.  Combined particle swarm optimization and linear discriminant analysis for landslide image classification: application to a case study in Taiwan , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[63]  J. P. Liu,et al.  A rough set approach to analyze factors affecting landslide incidence , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[64]  H. Miller Tobler's First Law and Spatial Analysis , 2004 .

[65]  M. Marjanović,et al.  Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm , 2011 .

[66]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression , 2006, Technometrics.

[67]  M. Charlton,et al.  Geographically Weighted Regression: A Natural Evolution of the Expansion Method for Spatial Data Analysis , 1998 .

[68]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.