UNILATERAL CHOLESTEATOMA AND HABITUAL SNIFFING

Objectie: To examine the clinical findings of acquired bilateral cholesteatoma with special reference to incidence of habitual sniffing and sniff-related negative middle ear pressure. Methods: Eighty-eight fresh cases of unilateral cholesteatoma and 33 fresh cases of bilateral cholesteatoma, which were operated on at Department of Otolaryngology, Hyogo College of Medicine, were examined in this study. Responses to a detailed questionnaire were obtained from the patients concerning about the habit of habitual sniffing to relieve aural symptoms such as auralfullness, autophonia or hyperacusis. The same questionnaire was obtained from unilateral cholesteatoma patients to compare the incidence of habitual sniffing with that of patients with bilateral cholesteatoma. We measured the negative middle ear pressure at the time of sniffing by using TTAG (tubo-tympano aerodynamic graphy, Nagashima Co. Ltd, Tokyo). We also compared the positive percentage of the sniff test in bilateral cholesteatoma with in unilateral cholesteatoma and normal controls. Sniff test was performed in 30 patients with bilateral cholesteatoma, 20 patients with unilateral cholesteatoma and 20 normal controls. Results: In 33 patients with bilateral cholesteatoma (66 ears), 57 ears had the pars flaccida type (86.4%) and 9 ears had the pars tensa type (13.6%). Cholesteatoma of pars flaccida type were predominant in bilateral cholesteatoma. The rate of habitual sniffing of bilateral cholesteatoma (23/33, 69.7%) was significantly higher than that of unilateral cholesteatoma (21/88, 23.9%). The incidence of positive sniff test in bilateral cholesteatoma (19/30, 63.3%) was significantly higher than in unilateral one (6/20, 30%) and normal control (3/20, 15%). Conclusions: Habitual sniffing was closely related to the pathogenesis of bilateral cholesteatoma, especially in cases with bilateral pars flaccida type. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. Sakagami,et al.  Bilateral cholesteatoma and habitual sniffing. , 2002, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[2]  I. Honjo,et al.  Influence of the Gas Exchange Function Through the Middle Ear Mucosa on the Development of Sniff‐Induced Middle Ear Diseases , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  T. Takasaka,et al.  Incidence of sniff-related cholesteatomas. , 1996, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  T. Takasaka,et al.  The habit of sniffing in nasal diseases as a cause of secretory otitis media. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[5]  E. Vartiainen Fate of patients with bilateral cholesteatoma. , 1993, American journal of otolaryngology.

[6]  T. Takasaka,et al.  Voluntarily retractable tympanic membranes: case report. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[7]  B. Magnuson,et al.  Evacuation of the Middle Ear by Sniffing: A Cause of High Negative Pressure and Development of Middle Ear Disease , 1984, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[8]  R. Chalton,et al.  The incidence of bilateral chronic otitis media , 1984, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[9]  B. Falk Sniff-induced negative middle ear pressure: study of a consecutive series of children with otitis media with effusion. , 1982, American journal of otolaryngology.

[10]  B. Magnuson,et al.  Tympanoplasty and recurrent disease: sniff-induced high negative pressure in the middle ear space. , 1981, American journal of otolaryngology.

[11]  B. Magnuson On the origin of the high negative pressure in the middle ear space. , 1981, American Journal of Otolaryngology.

[12]  B. Magnuson Tubal Closing Failure in Retraction Type Cholesteatoma and Adhesive Middle Ear Lesions , 1978 .