Systems Development Process Improvement: A Knowledge Integration Perspective

Although organizations have applied a variety of practices and tools to address information systems development (ISD) performance problems, most of these approaches have focused on controlling and improving predictability of the development process. There is growing recognition that ISD is a knowledge-intensive process that requires the integration of specialized stakeholder knowledge. We develop the perspective that integration of this specialized knowledge across knowledge boundaries in the ISD process drives ISD performance. We theorize that formal and informal organizational integrative practices influence ISD performance, because they facilitate the development of boundary objects that effectively span knowledge boundaries. Results from a field study of 110 firms provide considerable support for the proposed model. This paper makes three novel contributions to the technology management literature. First, it demonstrates that knowledge integration across knowledge boundaries through boundary objects improves ISD performance. Second, it shows how formal and informal organizational integrative practices enhance the integration of specialized knowledge within and across organizational subunits. Third, it shows that the positive influence of formal and informal organizational integrative practices on ISD performance is partially mediated by knowledge integration. For engineering and technology managers, the results highlight the centrality of knowledge integration for the management of technology development. Collectively, these findings offer a novel knowledge integration-based perspective that complements prior research on systems development and new product development

[1]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Management of Large Software Development Efforts , 1980, MIS Q..

[2]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[3]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[4]  Amrit Tiwana Knowledge Integration in Virtual Teams: The Potential Role of Knowledge Management Systems , 2006 .

[5]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Enabling the Effective Involvement of Multiple Users: Methods and Tools for Collaborative Software Engineering , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Mark Keil,et al.  How Software Project Risk Affects Project Performance: An Investigation of the Dimensions of Risk and an Exploratory Model , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[7]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[8]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Components of Software Development Risk: How to Address Them? A Project Manager Survey , 2000, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[9]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[11]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Overcoming the problems in information systems development by building and sustaining commitment , 1995 .

[12]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[13]  R. McDermott Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[14]  Pierre N. Robillard,et al.  The role of knowledge in software development , 1999, CACM.

[15]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[16]  J. T. M. van Der Zee,et al.  Alignment Is Not Enough: Integrating Business and Information Technology Management with the Balanced Business Scorecard , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[19]  M. Lindvall,et al.  Knowledge management in software engineering , 2002, IEEE Software.

[20]  M. Feldman,et al.  Electronic Mail and Organizational Communication: Does Saying Hi Really Matter? , 1998 .

[21]  J. Mack,et al.  When Subordinates Become IT Contractors: Persistent Managerial Expectations in IT Outsourcing , 2003 .

[22]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Learning to Specify Information Requirements: The Relationship between Application and Methodology , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Alan M. Davis,et al.  A Unified Model of Requirements Elicitation , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  H. Bahrami The Emerging Flexible Organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley , 1992 .

[27]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Chapter 1 – A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation1 , 2000 .

[28]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[29]  SambamurthyV.,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations , 2001 .

[30]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[31]  R. Grant,et al.  A KNOWLEDGE-BASED THEORY OF INTER-FIRM COLLABORATION. , 1995 .

[32]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A framework for identifying software project risks , 1998, CACM.

[35]  Balasubramaniam Ramesh,et al.  Process Knowledge Management with Traceability , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[36]  Gary Lynn,et al.  Knowledge Management in New Product Teams: Practices and Outcomes , 2000 .

[37]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  John F. S. Bunch Connecting The Dots: Aligning Projects with Objectives in Unpredictable Times , 2003 .

[39]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process , 1994 .

[40]  T. Davenport,et al.  Building Successful Knowledge Management Projects , 1997 .

[41]  A. von Meier,et al.  Occupational cultures as a challenge to technological innovation , 1999 .

[42]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[43]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[44]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[45]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment , 1990 .

[46]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[47]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  An assessment of the prototyping approach to information systems development , 1984, CACM.

[48]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[49]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The one-minute risk assessment tool , 2004, CACM.

[50]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  R CarlilePaul A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[53]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[54]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[55]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[56]  A OkhuysenGerardo,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups , 2002 .

[57]  Shivram Ramasubramanian,et al.  Knowledge Management at Infosys , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[58]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[59]  Gerard O’Regan,et al.  The Capability Maturity Model , 2002 .

[60]  Claes Fornell,et al.  A second generation of multivariate analysis , 1982 .

[61]  C. R. Franz,et al.  Group process and conflict in system development , 1989 .

[62]  Mani R. Subramani,et al.  The Matrix of Control: Combining Process and Structure Approaches to Managing Software Development , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[64]  Paul N. Finlay,et al.  Perceptions of the Benefits From the Introduction of CASE: An Empirical Study , 1994, MIS Q..

[65]  J. Spender Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[66]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing, and integration , 1993, CACM.

[67]  Sarma R. Nidumolu The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[68]  H. Demsetz The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[69]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation , 2001 .

[70]  Michael S. Deutsch,et al.  An exploratory analysis relating the software project management process to project success , 1991 .

[71]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[72]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Knowledge Management Effectiveness , 2001, ICIS.

[73]  Mirjana Petkovic,et al.  Managing Organizational Knowledge While Downsizing Organizations , 2009, Tourism and hospitality management.

[74]  Patricia J. Guinan,et al.  Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[75]  Michael S. H. Heng,et al.  Users and designers as partners ‐ design method and tools for user participation and designer accountability within the design process , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[76]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[77]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[78]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[79]  R. Zmud Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[80]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  When knowledge is the critical resource, knowledge management is the critical task , 1989 .

[81]  W. W. Rozeboom Sensitivity of a linear composite of predictor items to differential item weighting , 1979 .

[82]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Integrating specific knowledge: insights from the Kennedy Space Center , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[83]  T. Somers,et al.  Alignment of a firm's competitive strategy and information technology management sophistication: the missing link , 1997 .

[84]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  Information Technology Development Creativity: A Case Study of Attempted Radical Change , 2000, MIS Q..

[85]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[86]  David Wilemon,et al.  Software development and new product development: potentials for cross-domain knowledge sharing , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[87]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[88]  Alistair Cockburn,et al.  Agile Software Development: The Business of Innovation , 2001, Computer.

[89]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[90]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[91]  Liam Fahey,et al.  The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[92]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[93]  W. Bennis,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[94]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[95]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[96]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Process integration in CASE environments , 1992, IEEE Software.

[97]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Structural analysis of the impact of knowledge creation and knowledge embedding on software process capability , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[99]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .