Merkel complexes of human digital skin: Three‐dimensional imaging with confocal laser microscopy and double immunofluorescence

Three‐dimensional (3‐D) reconstruction of images provided by confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) is a powerful tool in a morpho‐functional approach to cutaneous innervation studies. To investigate mechanoreceptors in the hand, a study of Merkel complexes was performed in human finger. A double fluorescent‐conjugated immunolabeling with antibodies against neurofilament (NF 200) and cytokeratin (CK 20) on floating, thick cutaneous samples (80 to 100 μm), was used. After acquisition of serial optical planes by CSLM, reconstruction was performed with 3‐D reconstruction software tools. Merkel cells were clearly labeled with CK 20, whereas nerve components were only NF 200 reactive. The cells, localized on the basal lamina of the epidermis, were usually arranged in clusters of five to eight cells. Each cell was connected to a nerve process ramification originating from a unique fiber. Quantitative data, compiled from a sample of 25 Merkel complexes, gave a mean cell diameter of 13 ± 1 μm and a mean nerve fiber size of 3 ± 1 μm. Surface measurements were done on a single reconstructed cluster with a mean and standard error which only refers to the optical 3‐D resolution. It gives a surface of 12 ± 1 μm2 for the contact zone between cell and nerve fiber and a cluster area of about 500 μm2. The great precision of reconstructed images provides a detailed analysis of spatial relationships between abutting nerve fibers and Merkel cells. Data interpretation is improved with complementary ultrastructural and physiological studies results, and this allows an accurate investigation of cutaneous sensory endings. J. Comp. Neurol. 398:98–104, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  H. Ralston,et al.  The pattern of cutaneous innervation of the human foot. , 1958, The American journal of anatomy.

[2]  J. Meyer,et al.  The fusion of Merkel cell granules with a synapse-like structure. , 1973, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[3]  K W Horch,et al.  Impulse generation in type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  A S Breathnach,et al.  Electron microscopy of cutaneous nerves and receptors. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  R. Saxod Ultrastructure of Merkel corpuscles and so-called "transitional" cells in the white Leghorn chicken. , 1978, The American journal of anatomy.

[6]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  E. Weihe,et al.  Fine structural analysis of the synaptic junction of Merkel cell-axon-complexes. , 1980, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  K. Gottschaldt,et al.  Merkel cell receptors: structure and transducer function. , 1981, Science.

[9]  J. Polak,et al.  Neuron-specific enolase in the Merkel cells of mammalian skin. The use of specific antibody as a simple and reliable histologic marker. , 1981, The American journal of pathology.

[10]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensitivity to edges of mechanoreceptive afferent units innervating the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1982, Brain Research.

[11]  T. Iwanaga,et al.  Meissner's and Pacinian corpuscles as studied by immunohistochemistry for S-100 protein, neuron-specific enolase and neurofilament protein , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  A. Dhillon,et al.  PGP 9.5—a new marker for vertebrate neurons and neuroendocrine cells , 1983, Brain Research.

[13]  R. Johansson,et al.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[14]  R. Moll,et al.  Identification of Merkel cells in human skin by specific cytokeratin antibodies: changes of cell density and distribution in fetal and adult plantar epidermis. , 1984, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[15]  A. Iggo,et al.  The effects of hypoxia on slowly adapting type I (SAI) cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the cat and rat. , 1987, Somatosensory research.

[16]  E G Pacitti,et al.  Calcium channel blockers and Merkel cells. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[17]  Winkelmann Rk Cutaneous sensory nerves. , 1988 .

[18]  L R Mills,et al.  Evidence that the Merkel cell is not the transducer in the mechanosensory Merkel cell-neurite complex. , 1988, Progress in brain research.

[19]  D. M. Shotton,et al.  Confocal scanning optical microscopy and its applications for biological specimens , 1989 .

[20]  Immunohistochemical analysis of chromogranin A and multiple peptides in the mammalian Merkel cell: further evidence for its paraneuronal function? , 1989, Archives of histology and cytology.

[21]  J. Saurat,et al.  Relationship between Merkel cells and nerve endings during embryogenesis in the mouse epidermis. , 1990, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[22]  J. Polak,et al.  An immunocytochemical study of cutaneous innervation and the distribution of neuropeptides and protein gene product 9.5 in man and commonly employed laboratory animals. , 1991, The American journal of anatomy.

[23]  J. Ortonne,et al.  Anatomical mapping of Merkel cells in normal human adult epidermis , 1991, The British journal of dermatology.

[24]  P. Vos,et al.  Merkel cells in vitro: production of nerve growth factor and selective interactions with sensory neurons. , 1991, Developmental biology.

[25]  L. Stensaas,et al.  Serotonin‐like immunoreactivity in Merkel cells and their afferent neurons in touch domes from the hairy skin of rats , 1992, The Anatomical record.

[26]  R. Moll,et al.  Early development of human Merkel cells , 1992, Experimental dermatology.

[27]  Y. Narisawa,et al.  Biological significance of dermal Merkel cells in development of cutaneous nerves in human fetal skin. , 1992, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[28]  N. Walsh,et al.  The distribution of Merkel cells in human fetal and adult skin. , 1992, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[29]  G. Wendelschafer‐Crabb,et al.  The innervation of human epidermis , 1993, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[30]  Y Usson,et al.  Method for 3D volumetric analysis of intranuclear fluorescence distribution in confocal microscopy. , 1993, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[31]  C. Rumio,et al.  Central and peripheral nervous structures as seen at the confocal scanning laser microscope , 1994, Journal of microscopy.

[32]  Y. Narisawa,et al.  Immunohistochemical demonstration of the expression of neurofilament proteins in Merkel cells. , 1994, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[33]  R. Moll,et al.  Cytokeratin 20 is a general marker of cutaneous Merkel cells while certain neuronal proteins are absent. , 1995, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[34]  G Westling,et al.  Tactile unit properties after human cervical spinal cord injury. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  C. Rumio,et al.  The Innervation of Human Skin Studied with Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy: A Comparison between PGP 9.5 Immunofluorescence and Silver Impregnations , 1995, NeuroImage.

[36]  L R Mills,et al.  Merkel cells are not the mechanosensory transducers in the touch dome of the rat , 1995, Journal of neurocytology.

[37]  T. Tachibana The Merkel cell: recent findings and unresolved problems. , 1995, Archives of histology and cytology.

[38]  R Paus,et al.  Merkel cells in mouse skin: intermediate filament pattern, localization, and hair cycle-dependent density. , 1996, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[39]  R. Saxod Ontogeny of the cutaneous sensory organs , 1996, Microscopy research and technique.

[40]  Y. Narisawa,et al.  Merkel cells participate in the induction and alignment of epidermal ends of arrector pili muscles of human fetal skin , 1996, The British journal of dermatology.