Effect of crop rotation and fertilisation on maize and wheat yields and yield stability in a long-term experiment

Abstract Long-term experiments are leading indicators of sustainability and serve as an early warning system to detect problems that threaten future productivity. A non-decreasing trend in yield is necessary to call a system sustainable. The stability of yield is also an important characteristic to be considered when judging the value of a cropping system relative to others. In a long-term crop rotation experiment set up in 1961 the effects of seven crop sequences and five fertilisation treatments were studied on the yields of maize ( Zea mays L.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and on yield stability. In the two-factorial split-plot experiment the main plots consisted of crop sequences, namely maize and wheat monocultures, three dicultures, one triculture and a Norfolk crop rotation (maize–spring barley–peas–wheat). Apart from the control the fertiliser treatments represented various fertilisation systems, namely organic manuring (farmyard manure or recycled crop residues supplemented with NPK) and high levels of NPK fertilisation. The long-term experiment was analysed by conventional analysis of variance procedures and stability analysis. The yields of maize and wheat were lower in all cases in a monoculture than in a crop rotation. Reductions in maize yield in a monoculture were chiefly recorded after a dry winter, particularly if the summer was also dry. The reduction in wheat yield in a monoculture could be attributed mainly to pathogenic factors stimulated by the weather. The yield-increasing effect of crop rotation was inversely proportional to the ratio of maize or wheat in the sequence and was greatest in the Norfolk rotation, followed by the alfalfa–maize–wheat triculture, the wheat–maize, the alfalfa–maize and the alfalfa–wheat rotation. Farmyard manure and the recycling of crop residues (maize stalks, wheat straw) with NPK supplementation are efficient ways of fertilising maize and wheat. Significantly higher yields were obtained at high levels of NPK fertilisation, especially in rotations where the proportion of maize or wheat was 50% or higher. The yield-increasing effect of crop sequences compared to the wheat monoculture was not affected by fertilisation. In maize crop sequences, however, fertilisation reduced the rotation effect by almost half. Further research will be required to determine the biological explanation of this phenomenon. The regression method of stability analysis shows that the stability of various crop sequences differed significantly from those of monoculture. The difference can be attributed mainly to the significant differences between the intercepts. The results show that stability analysis is a suitable method for the interpretation of the significant environment×treatment interactions observed in variance analysis models of long-term crop rotation experiments. Both the variance and regression methods of stability analysis contributed to the characterisation of the stability of the experimental treatments in various environments.

[1]  R. K. Boman,et al.  Applications of stability analysis for single-site, long-term experiments , 1994 .

[2]  M. Kang USING GENOTYPE-BY-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR CROP CULTIVAR DEVELOPMENT , 1997 .

[3]  G. K. Shukla,et al.  Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability , 1972, Heredity.

[4]  V. Barnett,et al.  Agricultural Sustainability: Economic, Environmental and Statistical Considerations , 1996 .

[5]  K. W. Finlay,et al.  The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme , 1963 .

[6]  H. D. Patterson The analysis of the results of a rotation experiment on the use of straw and fertilizers , 1953, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[7]  W. A. Russell,et al.  Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties , 1966 .

[8]  F. Cady Experimental Design and Data Management of Rotation Experiments , 1991 .

[9]  José Crossa,et al.  Statistical analyses of multilocation trials , 1990 .

[10]  C. Francis,et al.  Crop improvement for sustainable agriculture , 1993 .

[11]  Hans-Peter Piepho,et al.  ANALYZING GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT DATA BY MIXED MODELS WITH MULTIPLICATIVE TERMS , 1997 .

[12]  Richard M. Cruse,et al.  Crop rotations for the 21st century , 1994 .

[13]  R. W. Willey Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32 , 1979 .

[14]  Frank Yates,et al.  The analysis of experiments containing different crop rotations , 1954 .

[15]  William G. Cochran,et al.  The analysis of groups of experiments , 1938, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[16]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers , 1993 .

[17]  D. F. Cox,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[18]  D. D. Mason,et al.  Comparison of Fertility Treatments in a Cop Rotation Experiment 1 , 1964 .

[19]  S. Clay,et al.  Corn and Soil Fertility Responses to Crop Rotation with Low, Medium, or High Inputs , 1998 .

[20]  R. Magari,et al.  STABLE: A BASIC Program for Calculating Stability and Yield-Stability Statistics , 1995 .

[21]  P. Hildebrand Modified stability analysis of Farmer managed, on-farm trials , 1984 .

[22]  Hans-Peter Piepho,et al.  Methods for Comparing the Yield Stability of Cropping Systems , 1998 .

[23]  P. W. Lane,et al.  Sensitivity (Stability) Analysis of Multiple Variety Trials, with Special Reference to Data Expressed as Proportions or Percentages , 1995, Experimental Agriculture.

[24]  Yu. A. Gur'yan,et al.  Parts I and II , 1982 .

[25]  R. L. Westerman,et al.  Use of stability analysis for long-term soil fertility experiments , 1993 .

[26]  Roger Mead,et al.  Statistical methods in agriculture and experimental biology , 1983 .

[27]  Roger Mead,et al.  A review of statistical ideas relevant to intercropping research , 1981 .

[28]  R. Mead,et al.  Stability comparison of intercropping and monocropping systems , 1986 .