Numerical Assessment of RF Human Exposure in Smart Mobility Communications

Cars are rapidly evolving into smart connected objects that can communicate not only with the infrastructure but also with other cars through vehicle-to vehicle (V2V) communication. By the end of 2023, more than 72 million vehicles worldwide will be equipped with devices and technologies that enable to exchange data and communicate with other cars. This challenging scenario is raising cross-cutting issues, such as those related to new radio-frequency exposures of the human body also when travelling. We evaluate the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) induced in a realistic smart mobility communication scenario operated at 5.9 GHz. V2V antennas were modeled and placed on a realistic 3D model of a city-car to numerically estimate SAR in the body regions and tissues of a human phantom (adult male) inside the car. We found that both local and whole-body average exposures were below the ICNIRP and IEEE limits for the general public in the 100 kHz-6 GHz band, being equal in the worst case scenario to 1.58 W/kg (head) and 0.008 W/kg, respectively. The highest SAR was found in the most superficial tissues (the skin) of body regions very close to the sources. The distance of the passenger from the antennas played an important role in the resulting SAR. This research has a potentially great clinical impact as it contributes to new and realistic knowledge on the exposure scenario in smart mobility communication to assess possible health effects and for the design of policies for public health management.

[1]  Matthias A. Hein,et al.  Automotive Antenna Roof for Cooperative Connected Driving , 2019, IEEE Access.

[2]  Erik Aguirre,et al.  Analysis of estimation of electromagnetic dosimetric values from non-ionizing radiofrequency fields in conventional road vehicle environments , 2015, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[3]  Marloes Eeftens,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure measurements in Swiss adolescents. , 2017, Environment international.

[4]  Barbara M. Masini,et al.  Survey and Perspectives of Vehicular Wi-Fi versus Sidelink Cellular-V2X in the 5G Era , 2019, Future Internet.

[5]  A. M. Abdullah,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1997 .

[6]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz” , 2019, IEEE Access.

[7]  Yongle Wu,et al.  Specific Absorption Rate Evaluation for Passengers Using Wireless Communication Devices Inside Vehicles With Different Handedness, Passenger Counts, and Seating Locations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Joel M. Moskowitz,et al.  Comparison of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure levels in different everyday microenvironments in an international context. , 2018, Environment international.

[9]  A. R. Ruddle Influence of dielectric materials on in-vehicle electromagnetic fields , 2008 .

[10]  Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). , 2020, Health physics.

[11]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Ladislav Janousek,et al.  Possible Health Impacts of Advanced Vehicles Wireless Technologies , 2019 .

[13]  Gabriella Tognola,et al.  Use of Machine Learning in the Analysis of Indoor ELF MF Exposure in Children , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Personal exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in Europe: Is there a generation gap? , 2018, Environment international.

[15]  Thomas Kurner,et al.  Effects of Antenna Characteristics and Placements on a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Channel Scenario , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[16]  Ronan Sauleau,et al.  Electromagnetic dosimetry for adult and child models within a car: multi-exposure scenarios , 2011, International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies.

[17]  Aseim Elfrgani,et al.  Antenna Placement Optimization for Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting.

[18]  Francisco Falcone,et al.  Spatial Characterization of Personal RF-EMF Exposure in Public Transportation Buses , 2019, IEEE Access.

[19]  Gabriella Tognola,et al.  Cluster Analysis of Residential Personal Exposure to ELF Magnetic Field in Children: Effect of Environmental Variables , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  M. Parazzini,et al.  Influence of Low Frequency Near-Field Sources Position on the Assessment of Children Exposure Variability Using Stochastic Dosimetry , 2020, IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology.