Differential impact of learning path based versus conventional instruction in science education

Abstract Learning paths have the potential to change the teaching and learning interaction between teachers and students in a computer-supported learning environment. However, empirical research about learning paths is scarce. Previous studies showed that the low adoption of learning paths can be linked to the lack of knowledge on the part of teachers about learning path design and its implementation. In the present study, which was undertaken in the context of a biology course in secondary education, 496 14- to 15-years old secondary school students in Flanders were assigned to either learning path based or conventional instruction during classroom activities. The aim was to analyze the differential impact of the instructional formats on learning outcomes, considering variations in group setting and group composition. Given the focus on science learning, gender was also considered. Multilevel analysis was applied, and the results show empirical evidence for superior performance for both boys and girls in the learning path condition as compared with that in the conventional condition. In addition, when girls collaborate, they perform best within same-sex groups, whereas boys achieve better results in mixed-gender groups. The implications of the findings are important for tackling the gender gap in science learning. The findings can lead to guidelines for teachers who want to implement learning paths within an optimal learning environment design.

[1]  T. Schellens,et al.  Web-based Collaborative Inquiry to Bridge Gaps in Secondary Science Education , 2014 .

[2]  J. Hyde,et al.  The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students' performance and attitudes: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Ian H. Langford,et al.  A User’s Guide to MLwiN, Version 2.10 , 2000 .

[4]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design , 2007 .

[5]  Cindy De Smet,et al.  ELO's in het Vlaams secundair onderwijs: nieuw of alweer achterhaald , 2009 .

[6]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[7]  Barbara Lockee,et al.  FOUNDATIONS OF PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION , 2003 .

[8]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[9]  Jason Cole,et al.  Using Moodle - teaching with the popular open source course management system , 2007 .

[10]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[11]  S. Wheeler,et al.  Our flexible friend: The implications of individual differences for information technology teaching , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. , 1991 .

[13]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts 5 , 2007 .

[14]  Amy Soller,et al.  Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System , 2001 .

[15]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[16]  Thérèse Laferrière,et al.  Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[17]  Petru Lucian Curseu,et al.  The effects of gender variety and power disparity on group cognitive complexity in collaborative learning groups , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[18]  R. Mccarthy.  Working Memory. (Oxford Psychology Series No. 11.) , 1987 .

[19]  Risto Lethonen.  Multilevel Statistical Models (3rd ed.) , 2005 .

[20]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Web-based programmed instruction: evidence of rule-governed learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Joop J. Hox,et al.  Applied Multilevel Analysis. , 1995 .

[22]  Qing Li,et al.  A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning , 2010 .

[23]  Fred Paas,et al.  Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  John B. Nezlek,et al.  An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology , 2008 .

[25]  Sandra Schruijer,et al.  The effects of groups' variety and disparity on groups' cognitive complexity , 2007 .

[26]  Rien van der Leeden,et al.  Multilevel Analysis of Repeated Measures Data , 1998 .

[27]  B F SKINNER,et al.  Teaching machines; from the experimental study of learning come devices which arrange optimal conditions for self instruction. , 1958, Science.

[28]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[29]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[30]  Ana V. Diez Roux.  Multilevel analysis in public health research , 2000 .

[31]  Star Muir,et al.  The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching , 2015 .

[32]  S. Pressey.  A machine for automatic teaching of drill material. , 1927 .

[33]  Robin Kay,et al.  Evaluating the learning in learning objects , 2007 .

[34]  A. Ryan,et al.  Sex differences in math performance: The role of children's approach to schoolwork. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[35]  C. R. Westwick.  Item analysis. , 1976, The Journal of nursing education.

[36]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[37]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  WISE Science: Web-Based Inquiry in the Classroom , 2009 .

[38]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[39]  F. Fischer,et al.  Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[40]  Eric Werner,et al.  All systems go , 2007, Nature.

[41]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  A Qualitative Study on Learning and Teaching with Learning Paths in a Learning Management System. , 2016 .

[42]  Andreas Schleicher,et al.  PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World , 2007 .

[43]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Using Web-based Pedagogical Tools as Scaffolds for Self-regulated Learning , 2005 .

[44]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[45]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[46]  P. Cranton.  No One Way: Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 1998 .

[47]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[48]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The Testing Effect for Learning Principles and Procedures from Texts , 2014 .

[49]  David Trowbridge,et al.  Results from an Investigation of Groups Working at the Computer. , 1984 .

[50]  Ning Ding,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative learning and gender , 2009 .

[51]  Edwin P. Christmann,et al.  Microcomputer-Based Computer-Assisted Instruction within Differing Subject Areas: A Statistical Deduction , 1997 .

[52]  P. A. Cohen,et al.  A meta-analysis of outcome studies of visual-based instruction , 1981 .

[53]  Jason K. McDonald,et al.  Learning from programmed instruction: Examining implications for modern instructional technology , 2005 .

[54]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[55]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[56]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  The design and implementation of learning paths in a learning management system , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[57]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention , 1992, Proceedings. Twenty-Second Annual conference Frontiers in Education.

[58]  A. Paivio.  Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[59]  Pierre Dillenbourg.  Some technical implications of the ditributed cognition approach on the design of interactive learning environments , 1996 .

[60]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Gender differences in scholastic achievement: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  Claire M. Fletcher-Flinn,et al.  The Efficacy of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI): A Meta-Analysis , 1995 .

[62]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning , 2007, Learning and Instruction.

[63]  J. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Teaching on Secondary School Students. , 1983 .

[64]  D. Krathwohl.  A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .

[65]  R. Felder,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. III. Gender Differences in Student Performance and Attitudes , 1995 .

[66]  H. Kay.  Teaching Machines , 1961, Nature.

[67]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[68]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Mining students' behavior in web-based learning programs , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..