Resting state networks in empirical and simulated dynamic functional connectivity

Abstract It is well‐established that patterns of functional connectivity (FC) ‐ measures of correlated activity between pairs of voxels or regions observed in the human brain using neuroimaging ‐ are robustly expressed in spontaneous activity during rest. These patterns are not static, but exhibit complex spatio‐temporal dynamics. Over the last years, a multitude of methods have been proposed to reveal these dynamics on the level of the whole brain. One finding is that the brain transitions through different FC configurations over time, and substantial effort has been put into characterizing these configurations. However, the dynamics governing these transitions are more elusive, specifically, the contribution of stationary vs. non‐stationary dynamics is an active field of inquiry. In this study, we use a whole‐brain approach, considering FC dynamics between 66 ROIs covering the entire cortex. We combine an innovative dimensionality reduction technique, tensor decomposition, with a mean field model which possesses stationary dynamics. It has been shown to explain resting state FC averaged over time and multiple subjects, however, this average FC summarizes the spatial distribution of correlations while hiding their temporal dynamics. First, we apply tensor decomposition to resting state scans from 24 healthy controls in order to characterize spatio‐temporal dynamics present in the data. We simultaneously utilize temporal and spatial information by creating tensors that are subsequently decomposed into sets of brain regions (“communities”) that share similar temporal dynamics, and their associated time courses. The tensors contain pairwise FC computed inside of overlapping sliding windows. Communities are discovered by clustering features pooled from all subjects, thereby ensuring that they generalize. We find that, on the group level, the data give rise to four distinct communities that resemble known resting state networks (RSNs): default mode network, visual network, control networks, and somatomotor network. Second, we simulate data with our stationary mean field model whose nodes are connected according to results from DTI and fiber tracking. In this model, all spatio‐temporal structure is due to noisy fluctuations around the average FC. We analyze the simulated data in the same way as the empirical data in order to determine whether stationary dynamics can explain the emergence of distinct FC patterns (RSNs) which have their own time courses. We find that this is the case for all four networks using the spatio‐temporal information revealed by tensor decomposition if nodes in the simulation are connected according to model‐based effective connectivity. Furthermore, we find that these results require only a small part of the FC values, namely the highest values that occur across time and ROI pair. Our findings show that stationary dynamics can account for the emergence of RSNs. We provide an innovative method that does not make strong assumptions about the underlying data and is generally applicable to resting state or task data from different subject populations. HighlightsTensor decomposition is used to obtain resting state networks from dynamic FC (dFC).The largest 2% of the dFC values are sufficient to recover resting state networks.Mutual information distinguishes surrogate from real data better than correlation.RSNs also emerge from the dFC of data simulated with a dynamic mean field model.Realistic RSNs are obtained by connecting model nodes via effective connectivity.

[1]  C. J. Honeya,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009 .

[2]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[3]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Daniel M. Dunlavy,et al.  A scalable optimization approach for fitting canonical tensor decompositions , 2011 .

[6]  J. Gore,et al.  The Relationship of Anatomical and Functional Connectivity to Resting-State Connectivity in Primate Somatosensory Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[7]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Tensor Decompositions for Signal Processing Applications: From two-way to multiway component analysis , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[8]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Higher Dimensional Meta-State Analysis Reveals Reduced Resting fMRI Connectivity Dynamism in Schizophrenia Patients , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic coherence analysis of resting fMRI data to jointly capture state-based phase, frequency, and time-domain information , 2015, NeuroImage.

[11]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[12]  Adeel Razi,et al.  A DCM for resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Belger,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[14]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Sparse temporally dynamic resting-state functional connectivity networks for early MCI identification , 2016, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[15]  Vince D Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of neurocognitive networks in children , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Identification of Optimal Structural Connectivity Using Functional Connectivity and Neural Modeling , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Dante R Chialvo,et al.  Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[19]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Erratum to: Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical network model of object working memory dominated by recurrent inhibition , 2014, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[21]  K. Davis,et al.  Mind wandering away from pain dynamically engages antinociceptive and default mode brain networks , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Enzo Tagliazucchi,et al.  The Voxel-Wise Functional Connectome Can Be Efficiently Derived from Co-activations in a Sparse Spatio-Temporal Point-Process , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Functional connectivity dynamics: Modeling the switching behavior of the resting state , 2015, NeuroImage.

[24]  J. Morton,et al.  Tracking the Brain's Functional Coupling Dynamics over Development , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Common intrinsic connectivity states among posteromedial cortex subdivisions: Insights from analysis of temporal dynamics , 2014, NeuroImage.

[26]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[27]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[28]  Enzo Tagliazucchi,et al.  Dynamic BOLD functional connectivity in humans and its electrophysiological correlates , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  M. Raichle,et al.  Lag structure in resting-state fMRI. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Sigman,et al.  Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  G. Deco,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity reveals altered variability in functional connectivity among patients with major depressive disorder , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[33]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[34]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Drivers and modulators from push-pull and balanced synaptic input. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[36]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Evaluating dynamic bivariate correlations in resting-state fMRI: A comparison study and a new approach , 2014, NeuroImage.

[37]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain , 2007, Nature.

[38]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Time-resolved resting-state brain networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Tensor Decompositions: A New Concept in Brain Data Analysis? , 2013, ArXiv.

[40]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[41]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  An automated pipeline for constructing personalized virtual brains from multimodal neuroimaging data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[43]  Catie Chang,et al.  Decomposition of spontaneous brain activity into distinct fMRI co-activation patterns , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[44]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[45]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[46]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[47]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Transient brain activity disentangles fMRI resting-state dynamics in terms of spatially and temporally overlapping networks , 2015, Nature Communications.

[48]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Dynamic fluctuations coincide with periods of high and low modularity in resting-state functional brain networks , 2015, NeuroImage.

[49]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[50]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[51]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Catie Chang,et al.  Introducing co-activation pattern metrics to quantify spontaneous brain network dynamics , 2015, NeuroImage.

[53]  Pablo Balenzuela,et al.  Criticality in Large-Scale Brain fMRI Dynamics Unveiled by a Novel Point Process Analysis , 2012, Front. Physio..

[54]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[55]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorization T , 2007 .

[56]  Vesa Kiviniemi,et al.  A Sliding Time-Window ICA Reveals Spatial Variability of the Default Mode Network in Time , 2011, Brain Connect..

[57]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Detecting the Community Structure and Activity Patterns of Temporal Networks: A Non-Negative Tensor Factorization Approach , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Low Complexity Damped Gauss-Newton Algorithms for CANDECOMP/PARAFAC , 2012, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[60]  V D Calhoun,et al.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task‐related waveforms , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[61]  Christian Hennig,et al.  Recovering the number of clusters in data sets with noise features using feature rescaling factors , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[62]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[63]  P A Robinson,et al.  Determination of effective brain connectivity from functional connectivity with application to resting state connectivities. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[64]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  Haesun Park,et al.  Fast Nonnegative Tensor Factorization with an Active-Set-Like Method , 2012, High-Performance Scientific Computing.

[66]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[67]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[68]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic connectivity states estimated from resting fMRI Identify differences among Schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy control subjects , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[69]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[70]  Marjorie Jacobs,et al.  Default mode , 2016, Neurology.

[71]  Jean M. Vettel,et al.  Controllability of structural brain networks , 2014, Nature Communications.

[72]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks , 2009, NeuroImage.

[73]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  Fabio Pasqualetti,et al.  Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[75]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Tight Wavelet Frames on Multislice Graphs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[76]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Modeling the outcome of structural disconnection on resting-state functional connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[77]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Temporal Synchronization Networks Emerge from Connectivity Topology and Heterogeneity , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[79]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[81]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[82]  Laurent Thoraval,et al.  Identifying Dynamic Functional Connectivity Changes in Dementia with Lewy Bodies Based on Product Hidden Markov Models , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[83]  V. Haughton,et al.  Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[84]  Thomas J. Grabowski,et al.  Age-Related Differences in the Dynamic Architecture of Intrinsic Networks , 2014, Brain Connect..

[85]  Adeel Razi,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling revisited , 2017, NeuroImage.

[86]  M. Corbetta,et al.  How Local Excitation–Inhibition Ratio Impacts the Whole Brain Dynamics , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[87]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution , 2004, NeuroImage.

[88]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Between session reproducibility and between subject variability of diffusion MR and tractography measures , 2006, NeuroImage.

[89]  Marc Joliot,et al.  Brain activity at rest: a multiscale hierarchical functional organization. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[90]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[91]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[92]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[93]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[94]  Yasushi Miyashita,et al.  Direct comparison of spontaneous functional connectivity and effective connectivity measured by intracortical microstimulation: an fMRI study in macaque monkeys. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[95]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Identifying Network Correlates of Brain States Using Tensor Decompositions of Whole-Brain Dynamic Functional Connectivity , 2013, 2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging.

[96]  G. E. Smith The Human Brain , 1924, Nature.

[97]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..