Acoustic emission beamforming for enhanced damage detection

As civil infrastructure ages, the early detection of damage in a structure becomes increasingly important for both life safety and economic reasons. This paper describes the analysis procedures used for beamforming acoustic emission techniques as well as the promising results of preliminary experimental tests on a concrete bridge deck. The method of acoustic emission offers a tool for detecting damage, such as cracking, as it occurs on or in a structure. In order to gain meaningful information from acoustic emission analyses, the damage must be localized. Current acoustic emission systems with localization capabilities are very costly and difficult to install. Sensors must be placed throughout the structure to ensure that the damage is encompassed by the array. Beamforming offers a promising solution to these problems and permits the use of wireless sensor networks for acoustic emission analyses. Using the beamforming technique, the azmuthal direction of the location of the damage may be estimated by the stress waves impinging upon a small diameter array (e.g. 30mm) of acoustic emission sensors. Additional signal discrimination may be gained via array processing techniques such as the VESPA process. The beamforming approach requires no arrival time information and is based on very simple delay and sum beamforming algorithms which can be easily implemented on a wireless sensor or mote.

[1]  G. Carter Time delay estimation for passive sonar signal processing , 1981 .

[2]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  Condition monitoring of concrete structures using wireless sensor networks and MEMS , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[3]  Yajai Promboon,et al.  Acoustic emission source location , 2000 .

[4]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Interpretation of physical status of arrival picks for microseismic source location , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Array analysis of PKP phases and their precursors , 1972 .

[6]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[7]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Acoustic Emission Source Location , 1999 .

[8]  Timothy J. Fowler,et al.  Acoustic emission monitoring of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures , 1998, Smart Structures.

[9]  Douglas E. Adams,et al.  Structural Damage Identification in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Structures Using Beamforming , 2005 .

[10]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  A hybrid wireless sensor network for acoustic emission testing in SHM , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  Lingyu Yu,et al.  Lamb Wave-Mode Tuning of Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[12]  Sebastian Rost,et al.  ARRAY SEISMOLOGY: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS , 2002 .

[13]  D.E. Dudgeon,et al.  Fundamentals of digital array processing , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Shi-Chang Wooh,et al.  Experimental characterization of ultrasonic phased arrays for the nondestructive evaluation of concrete structures , 1999 .

[15]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques , 1993 .

[16]  Steven J Spencer,et al.  The two-dimensional source location problem for time differences of arrival at minimal element monitoring arrays. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.