Community trait overdispersion due to trophic interactions: concerns for assembly process inference

The expected link between competitive exclusion and community trait overdispersion has been used to infer competition in local communities, and trait clustering has been interpreted as habitat filtering. Such community assembly process inference has received criticism for ignoring trophic interactions, as competition and trophic interactions might create similar trait patterns. While other theoretical studies have generally demonstrated the importance of predation for coexistence, ours provides the first quantitative demonstration of such effects on assembly process inference, using a trait-based ecological model to simulate the assembly of a competitive primary consumer community with and without the influence of trophic interactions. We quantified and contrasted trait dispersion/clustering of the competitive communities with the absence and presence of secondary consumers. Trophic interactions most often decreased trait clustering (i.e. increased dispersion) in the competitive communities due to evenly distributed invasions of secondary consumers and subsequent competitor extinctions over trait space. Furthermore, effects of trophic interactions were somewhat dependent on model parameters and clustering metric. These effects create considerable problems for process inference from trait distributions; one potential solution is to use more process-based and inclusive models in inference.

[1]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Conceptual Synthesis in Community Ecology , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[3]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Juli G. Pausas,et al.  The Jungle of Methods for Evaluating Phenotypic and Phylogenetic Structure of Communities , 2010 .

[5]  F. B. Christiansen,et al.  Evolution and intraspecific exploitative competition I. One-locus theory for small additive gene effects , 1980 .

[6]  B. Emerson,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Nicolas Loeuille,et al.  Evolutionary emergence of size-structured food webs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  N. Loeuille Influence of evolution on the stability of ecological communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[9]  Nicolas Loeuille,et al.  Emergence and maintenance of biodiversity in an evolutionary food-web model , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[10]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[11]  C. Violle,et al.  Let the concept of trait be functional , 2007 .

[12]  Peter Chesson,et al.  The interaction between predation and competition , 2008, Nature.

[13]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. , 2013, Ecology Letters.

[14]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity metrics for ecological communities: integrating species richness, abundance and evolutionary history. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[15]  Thomas L. Vincent,et al.  Predator-Prey Coevolution as an Evolutionary Game , 1987 .

[16]  N. Loeuille,et al.  Evolution of body size in food webs: does the energetic equivalence rule hold? , 2006, Ecology letters.

[17]  J. Delong,et al.  A dynamic explanation of size-density scaling in carnivores. , 2012, Ecology.

[18]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  Nancy Knowlton,et al.  Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[20]  J. Delong,et al.  Size-density scaling in protists and the links between consumer-resource interaction parameters. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[21]  R. Holt Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[22]  Brian J Enquist,et al.  The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. , 2007, Ecology.

[23]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[24]  W. F. Boer,et al.  Influence of body size on coexistence of bird species , 2007, Ecological Research.

[25]  T. Vincent,et al.  COEVOLUTION AS AN EVOLUTIONARY GAME , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[27]  Per Lundberg,et al.  Niche co-evolution in consumer-resource communities , 2009 .

[28]  James P. Grover,et al.  The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis , 2002 .

[29]  V. Rudolf Seasonal shifts in predator body size diversity and trophic interactions in size-structured predator-prey systems. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[30]  Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt,et al.  Filtering across Spatial Scales: Phylogeny, Biogeography and Community Structure in Bumble Bees , 2013, PloS one.

[31]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[32]  Franck Jabot,et al.  Bitrophic interactions shape biodiversity in space , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Across ecosystem comparisons of size structure: methods, approaches and prospects , 2011 .

[34]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .