A pseudo-continuous neural network approach for developing water retention pedotransfer functions with limited data

Summary In this study, a new approach, which we called pseudo-continuous, to develop pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for predicting soil–water retention with an artificial neural network (ANN) was introduced and tested. It was compared with ANN PTFs developed using traditional point and parametric approaches. The pseudo-continuous approach has a continuous performance, i.e. it enables to predict water content at any desirable matric potential, but without the need to use a specific equation, such as the one by van Genuchten. Matric potential is considered as an input parameter, which enables to increase the number of samples in the training dataset with a factor equal to the number of matric potentials used to determine the water retention curve of the soil samples in the dataset. Generally, the pseudo-continuous functions performed slightly better than the point and parametric functions. The root mean square error (RMSE) of the pseudo-continuous functions when considering local data for training and testing, and with both bulk density and organic matter as extra input variables on top of sand, silt and clay content, was 0.027 m 3  m −3 compared to 0.029 m 3  m −3 for both the point and parametric PTF. The increased number of samples in the training phase and the selection of matric potential as an input variable enabling to predict water content at any desired matric potential are the most important reasons why pseudo-continuous functions would need more intention in the future. Uniformity in the training and test dataset was shown to be important in deriving PTFs. We finally recommend the use of pseudo-continuous PTFs for further improvement and development of PTFs, in particular when datasets are limited.

[1]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[2]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[3]  A. Roli Artificial Neural Networks , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  L. Baker,et al.  Optimisation of pedotransfer functions using an artificial neural network ensemble method , 2008 .

[5]  B. Gérard,et al.  Modeling hydraulic properties of sandy soils of Niger using pedotransfer functions , 2007 .

[6]  Y. Pachepsky,et al.  Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology , 2004 .

[7]  Mathieu Javaux,et al.  Using Pedotransfer Functions to Estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem Soil Hydraulic Properties: A Review , 2010 .

[8]  Bärbel Tiemeyer,et al.  Artificially Drained Catchments—From Monitoring Studies towards Management Approaches , 2010 .

[9]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Analysis of Soil Water Retention Data Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2004 .

[10]  S. Jones,et al.  Soil Water Content and Water Potential Relationships , 2018, Handbook of Soil Sciences (Two Volume Set).

[11]  Javier Tomasella,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques to Develop Pedotransfer Functions for Water Retention , 2003 .

[12]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Database-related accuracy and uncertainty of pedotransfer functions , 1998 .

[13]  Marc Van Meirvenne,et al.  Evaluation of Pedotransfer Functions for Predicting the Soil Moisture Retention Curve , 2001 .

[14]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Development of Pedotransfer Functions for Estimation of Soil Hydraulic Parameters using Support Vector Machines , 2009 .

[15]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics , 2001 .

[16]  Jianting Zhu,et al.  Including Topography and Vegetation Attributes for Developing Pedotransfer Functions , 2006 .

[17]  Y. Pachepsky,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks to Estimate Soil Water Retention from Easily Measurable Data , 1996 .

[18]  M. Schaap,et al.  Using neural networks to predict soil water retention and soil hydraulic conductivity , 1998 .

[19]  Feike J. Leij,et al.  The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils , 1992 .

[20]  A. Bruand,et al.  A conceptual model of the soil water retention curve , 1998 .

[21]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow , 1966 .

[22]  D. Timlin,et al.  Ensemble Approach to Provide Uncertainty Estimates of Soil Bulk Density , 2010 .

[23]  Costanza Calzolari,et al.  Development of pedotransfer functions using a group method of data handling for the soil of the Pianura Padano-Veneta region of North Italy: water retention properties , 2005 .

[24]  N. G. Patil,et al.  Evaluation of Water Retention Functions and Computer Program “Rosetta” in Predicting Soil Water Characteristics of Seasonally Impounded Shrink–Swell Soils , 2009 .

[25]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  The neuro-m method for fitting neural network parametric pedotransfer functions , 2002 .

[26]  R. T. Walczak,et al.  Using Support Vector Machines to Develop Pedotransfer Functions for Water Retention of Soils in Poland , 2008 .

[27]  W. Cornelis,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Models That Describe the Soil Water Retention Curve between Saturation and Oven Dryness , 2008 .

[28]  Marc Van Meirvenne,et al.  Comparison of Unimodal Analytical Expressions for the Soil-Water Retention Curve , 2005 .

[29]  Marcel G. Schaap,et al.  Functional evaluation of pedotransfer functions derived from different scales of data collection , 2003 .

[30]  Amin Elshorbagy,et al.  Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity In Spatially Variable Fields Using Neural Network Ensembles , 2006 .

[31]  Gururaj Hunsigi,et al.  Irrigation and drainage , 2009 .

[32]  E. Russell,et al.  Soil Physics , 1941, Nature.

[33]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of the Nonparametric Nearest Neighbor Technique to Estimate Soil Water Retention , 2006 .

[34]  Walter J. Rawls,et al.  Use of the Nonparametric Nearest Neighbor Approach to Estimate Soil Hydraulic Properties , 2006 .

[35]  B. Yegnanarayana,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks , 2004 .

[36]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  The Method for Fitting Neural Network Parametric Pedotransfer Functions , 2002 .

[37]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.