Lessons from innovation in drug-device combination products.

Drug-device combination products introduced a new dynamic on medical product development, regulatory approval, and corporate interaction that provide valuable lessons for the development of new generations of combination products. This paper examines the case studies of drug-eluting stents and transdermal patches to facilitate a detailed understanding of the challenges and opportunities introduced by combination products when compared to previous generations of traditional medical or drug delivery devices. Our analysis indicates that the largest barrier to introduce a new kind of combination products is the determination of the regulatory center that is to oversee its approval. The first product of a new class of combination products offers a learning opportunity for the regulator and the sponsor. Once that first product is approved, the leading regulatory center is determined, and the uncertainty about the entire class of combination products is drastically reduced. The sponsor pioneering a new class of combination products assumes a central role in reducing this uncertainty by advising the decision on the primary function of the combination product. Our analysis also suggests that this decision influences the nature (pharmaceutical, biotechnology, or medical devices) of the companies that will lead the introduction of these products into the market, and guide the structure of corporate interaction thereon.

[1]  Wijaya Martanto,et al.  Transdermal Delivery of Insulin Using Microneedles in Vivo , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[2]  Kinam Park,et al.  Mechanisms of controlled drug release from drug-eluting stents. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[3]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Micro-scale devices for transdermal drug delivery. , 2008, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[4]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION , 2011 .

[5]  Tielin Shi,et al.  Iontophoresis-driven penetration of nanovesicles through microneedle-induced skin microchannels for enhancing transdermal delivery of insulin. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[6]  Michel Cormier,et al.  Microneedle-based vaccines. , 2009, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[7]  Masato Nakamura,et al.  Role of stent design and coatings on restenosis and thrombosis. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[8]  David W Grainger,et al.  Drug/device combinations for local drug therapies and infection prophylaxis. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[9]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[11]  W. Hunter,et al.  Drug-eluting stents: a multidisciplinary success story. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[12]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Enhancement of transdermal drug delivery via synergistic action of chemicals. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  H. Vrolijk The innovator’s prescription: a disruptive solution for health care. , 2010 .

[14]  D. Baim,et al.  Reduced risk of restenosis in small vessels and reduced risk of myocardial infarction in long lesions with the new thin-strut TAXUS Liberté stent: 1-year results from the TAXUS ATLAS program. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[16]  R. K. Sharma,et al.  TRANSDERMAL DRUG DELIVERY , 2010 .

[17]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Conclusions , 1989 .

[20]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[21]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[22]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[23]  N. Weissman,et al.  TAXUS Liberté attenuates the risk of restenosis in patients with medically treated diabetes mellitus: results from the TAXUS ATLAS program. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[24]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  J. Lasala,et al.  Two-year results of paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with medically treated diabetes mellitus from the TAXUS ARRIVE program. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  P. Serruys,et al.  A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.