Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

PURPOSE Recent studies from the authors' laboratory have suggested that reduced audibility in the high frequencies (because of the bandwidth of hearing instruments) may play a role in the delays in phonological development often exhibited by children with hearing impairment. The goal of the current study was to extend previous findings on the effect of bandwidth on fricatives/affricates to more complex stimuli. METHOD Nine fricatives/affricates embedded in 2-syllable nonsense words were filtered at 5 and 10 kHz and presented to normal-hearing 6- to 7-year-olds who repeated words exactly as heard. Responses were recorded for subsequent phonetic and acoustic analyses. RESULTS Significant effects of talker gender and bandwidth were found, with better performance for the male talker and the wider bandwidth condition. In contrast to previous studies, relatively small (5%) mean bandwidth effects were observed for /s/ and /z/ spoken by the female talker. Acoustic analyses of stimuli used in the previous and the current studies failed to explain this discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS It appears likely that a combination of factors (i.e., dynamic cues, prior phonotactic knowledge, and perhaps other unidentified cues to fricative identity) may have facilitated the perception of these complex nonsense words in the current study.

[1]  S. Soli,et al.  Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E D Schubert,et al.  Consonant phonemic errors associated with pure-tone configurations and certain kinds of hearing impairment. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  Carl C. Crandell,et al.  Speech Perception in the Classroom. , 1999 .

[4]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  The Hearing Aid Input: A Phonemic Approach to Assessing the Spectral Distribution of Speech , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[5]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[6]  M. P. Moeller,et al.  Vocalizations of Infants with Hearing Loss Compared with Infants with Normal Hearing: Part I – Phonetic Development , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[7]  Christine H. Shadle,et al.  A parametric study of the spectral characteristics of European Portuguese fricatives , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[8]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Imitation of Nonwords by Deaf Children after Cochlear Implantation: Preliminary Findings , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[9]  R A Bentler,et al.  Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[10]  Relative Occurrence of Phonemes in American English , 1959 .

[11]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  Variability in /s/ production in children and adults: evidence from dynamic measures of spectral mean. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Ronald J. Baken,et al.  Clinical measurement of speech and voice , 1987 .

[14]  P. Denes On the Statistics of Spoken English , 1963 .

[15]  A. Henry,et al.  The grammatical morpheme deficit in moderate hearing impairment. , 2007, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[16]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[17]  A. Markides The speech of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility. , 1970, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[18]  M. Hardin-Jones,et al.  Oral communication skills of children who are hard of hearing. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[20]  M. P. Moeller,et al.  Vocalizations of Infants with Hearing Loss Compared with Infants with Normal Hearing: Part II – Transition to Words , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[21]  D D Dirks,et al.  Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  R S McGowan,et al.  Differences in fricative production between children and adults: evidence from an acoustic analysis of /sh/ and /s/. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  C. Norbury,et al.  Production of English finite verb morphology: a comparison of SLI and mild-moderate hearing impairment. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  Andrea L Pittman,et al.  Spectral characteristics of speech at the ear: implications for amplification in children. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[25]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Bandwidth effects on children's perception of the inflectional morpheme /s/: acoustical measurements, auditory detection, and clarity rating. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Acoustic and spectral characteristics of young children's fricative productions: a developmental perspective. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  F. Rudmin The Why and How of Hearing /s/. , 1983 .

[29]  Andrea L Pittman,et al.  Aided Perception of /s/ and /z/ by Hearing-Impaired Children , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[30]  G. W. Hughes,et al.  Spectral Properties of Fricative Consonants , 1956 .

[31]  M Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  Dawna E Lewis,et al.  Effect of Stimulus Bandwidth on Auditory Skills in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Children , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[33]  E. Owens Consonant errors and remediation in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1978, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[34]  A. Markides The speech of hearing-impaired children , 1983 .

[35]  N. Shepard,et al.  Characteristics of hearing-impaired children in the public schools: part II--psychoeducational data. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[36]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[37]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. Parker,et al.  Children with Minimal Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Prevalence, Educational Performance, and Functional Status , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[39]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  S Nittrouer,et al.  Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: evidence from spectral moments. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Spectral distribution of /s/ and the frequency response of hearing aids. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[42]  R C Seewald,et al.  Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[43]  R. Smits,et al.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  R K Clifton,et al.  Trading relations in the perception of speech by 5-year-old children. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.