Dominance and heterosexual attraction

Four experiments examined the relation between behavioral expressions of dominance and the heterosexual attractiveness of males and females. Predictions concerning the relation between dominance and heterosexual attraction were derived from a consideration of sex role norms and from the comparative biological literature. All four experiments indicated an interaction between dominance and sex of target. Dominance behavior increased the attractiveness of males, but had no effect on the attractiveness of females. The third study indicated that the effect did not depend on the sex of the rater or on the sex of those with whom the dominant target interacted. The fourth study showed that the effect was specific to dominance as an independent variable and did not occur for related constructs (aggressive or domineering). This study also found that manipulated dominance enhanced only a male's sexual attractiveness and not his general Usability. The results were discussed in terms of potential biological and cultural causal mechanisms. Concepts that refer to an individual's relative position in a social hierarchy occupy prominent positions in current models of personality and social behavior (Edelmarv & Omark, 1973; Hogan, 1979,1982;StrayerS his analysis of personality descriptions in different language groups indicates that dominance-submission is a universal lexical feature of human languages. The research reported here concerns the relation between behavioral expressions of dominance and the sexual attractiveness of males and females. Specific relations between dominance and attraction are predicted both by sociobiological theories that emphasize evolutionarily determined behavior tendencies and by scciocultural theories that emphasize socialization practices and sex role expectations.

[1]  Paul G. Schurman Male liberation , 1987 .

[2]  D. Buss,et al.  Human Mate Selection , 2020 .

[3]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences , 1985 .

[4]  D. Buss,et al.  Evolutionary biology and personality psychology. Toward a conception of human nature and individual differences. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[5]  P. A. Wells,et al.  Genetic similarity theory: Beyond kin selection , 1984, Behavior genetics.

[6]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Sex, Evolution, and Behavior, 2nd Edition, Martin Daly, Margo Wilson. Willard Grant Press, Boston (1983), xiv, +402. Price £15.75 (paperback) , 1984 .

[7]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[8]  R Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic theory of personality. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[9]  E. Wilson,et al.  Genes, mind, and culture : the coevolutionary process , 1982 .

[10]  R. Rubin,et al.  Postnatal gonadal steroid effects on human behavior. , 1981, Science.

[11]  H. Meyer-Bahlburg,et al.  Effects of prenatal sex hormones on gender-related behavior. , 1981, Science.

[12]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in the evaluation and performance of dominant acts , 1981 .

[13]  G. White Conceptual Universale in Interpersonal Language , 1980 .

[14]  D. Buss,et al.  The frequency concept of disposition: dominance and prototypically dominant acts^ , 1980 .

[15]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[16]  S. Hrdy Primate behavior. , 1980, Science.

[17]  D. Symons Evolution of human sexuality , 1979 .

[18]  Nina L. Colwill,et al.  The psychology of sex differences , 1978 .

[19]  D. Ruble,et al.  Beliefs about Males , 1978 .

[20]  R. Rosenthal Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[21]  M. Daly,et al.  Sex, evolution, and behavior , 1978 .

[22]  J. Strayer,et al.  An ethological analysis of social agonism and dominance relations among preschool children. , 1976 .

[23]  Jack W. Sattel,et al.  The Forty-Nine Percent Majority: The Male Sex Role , 1976 .

[24]  G. Kolata Primate behavior: sex and the dominant male. , 1976, Science.

[25]  E. Wilson,et al.  Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , 1976 .

[26]  Jeanne Marecek,et al.  When Stereotypes Hurt: Three Studies of Penalties for Sex-Role Reversals. , 1975 .

[27]  Donald R. Omark,et al.  Dominance hierarchies in young children , 1973 .

[28]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Plasma Testosterone Levels in the Male Rhesus: Influences of Sexual and Social Stimuli , 1972, Science.

[29]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal , 1972 .

[30]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[31]  J. Holaday,et al.  Plasma Testosterone, Dominance Rank and Aggressive Behaviour in Male Rhesus Monkeys , 1971, Nature.

[32]  G. Saayman Behaviour of the adult males in a troop of free-ranging chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). , 1971, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[33]  G. Saayman Behaviour of the adult males in a troop of free-ranging Chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). , 1971, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[34]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. , 1970, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  A. Mehrabian Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior , 1968 .

[36]  Jane Van Lawick-Goodall,et al.  The Behaviour of Free-living Chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve , 1968 .

[37]  P. McReynolds,et al.  Advances in Psychological Assessment , 1968 .

[38]  T. Struhsaker Behavior of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) , 1967 .

[39]  J. Buettner‐Janusch Primate behavior. Field studies of monkeys and apes. , 1966 .

[40]  Lionel Tiger,et al.  Primate Behavior: Field of Studies Monkeys and Apes , 1965 .

[41]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[42]  C. Carpenter,et al.  Sexual behavior of free ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). I. Specimens, procedures and behavi , 1942 .

[43]  V. Reynolds,et al.  The Social Life of Monkeys and Apes. , 1981 .

[44]  F. S. Marvin The Emergence of Man , 1932, Nature.

[45]  A. S. Parkes The Social Life of Monkeys and Apes , 1932, Nature.

[46]  C. Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .