Predicting the environmental impact of a future nanocellulose production at industrial scale: Application of the life cycle assessment scale-up framework

Abstract Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies of lab-scale processes come with certain limitations as they are not reflecting e.g. higher efficiencies of large-scale production. To address this, we developed in an earlier manuscript a scale-up framework for chemical processes which is applied in this paper here. Following the framework's five-step procedure on the case of a new nanocellulose production pathway, a scaled-up LCA study for a future production of nanocellulose is performed. The comparison of these LCA results with competing and already commercially produced materials as well as with the lab-scale process demonstrates the usefulness of the whole scale-up procedure. The example shows that the environmental impact per kg of produced nanocellulose yarn can be lowered by a factor of up to 6.5 compared to the laboratory production, reflecting a projected impact that is closer to the values of an actual production plant in case the material will be commercialized. Our results got also better comparable to those of competing materials, showing values that are up to three times smaller than for carbon fibers. Looking into the process, the chosen example of nanocellulose shows a considerable change concerning the relative contributions of the various process steps. While in the lab scale, the enzymatic treatment step – which involved heating for an extended period – was the dominant contributor, this step proved to be negligible in terms of environmental impact at industrial-scale production given that a more efficient and well-insulated reactor is used. The identification of such changes is a major added value of the applied scale-up framework which cannot be achieved with scale-up procedures using a simple, global scaling factor. One of the main purposes of the whole scale-up at such an early stage is to give improvement recommendations. The framework can be considered as being an effective support for eco-design purposes, helping in identifying hotspots for process improvements. It gives a better understanding of the process and shows the practical scalability of the various steps. Overall, it can assist in steering the research of new chemicals and materials more towards an industrial application.

[1]  Julien Bras,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose - its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. , 2012, Carbohydrate polymers.

[2]  Denise Ott,et al.  Rules and benefits of Life Cycle Assessment in green chemical process and synthesis design: a tutorial review , 2015 .

[3]  Narayan Singh Thakur,et al.  Chemical composition, functional properties and processing of carrot—a review , 2012, Journal of Food Science and Technology.

[4]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Life-cycle inventory of waste solvent distillation: statistical analysis of empirical data. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Molecular-structure-based models of chemical inventories using neural networks. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Wind Power Electricity: The Bigger the Turbine, The Greener the Electricity? , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a New Technology To Extract, Functionalize and Orient Cellulose Nanofibers from Food Waste , 2015 .

[8]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Scaling Relationships in Life Cycle Assessment , 2014 .

[9]  J. Jenck,et al.  Products and processes for a sustainable chemical industry: a review of achievements and prospects , 2004 .

[10]  J W Anderson,et al.  Dietary fiber content of selected foods. , 1988, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[11]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  Multi-perspective application selection: a method to identify sustainable applications for new materials using the example of cellulose nanofiber reinforced composites , 2016 .

[12]  Masaya Nogi,et al.  Transparent Nanocomposites Based on Cellulose Produced by Bacteria Offer Potential Innovation in the Electronics Device Industry , 2008 .

[13]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[14]  Agnieszka Nawirska,et al.  Dietary fibre fractions from fruit and vegetable processing waste , 2005 .

[15]  R. Carle,et al.  By-products of plant food processing as a source of functional compounds — recent developments , 2001 .

[16]  Brenda Shine Methods for estimating volatile organic compound emissions from batch processing facilities , 1996 .

[17]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Bridging data gaps in environmental assessments: Modeling impacts of fine and basic chemical production , 2009 .

[18]  Stefan Seeger,et al.  From laboratory to industrial scale: a scale-up framework for chemical processes in life cycle assessment studies , 2016 .

[19]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Power-law relationships for estimating mass, fuel consumption and costs of energy conversion equipments. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[21]  Cássia Maria Lie Ugaya,et al.  Life cycle assessment of cellulose nanowhiskers , 2012 .

[22]  James H. Clark,et al.  Green chemistry: today (and tomorrow) , 2006 .

[23]  F. Pla,et al.  State of the Art Manufacturing and Engineering of Nanocellulose: A Review of Available Data and Industrial Applications , 2013 .

[24]  Sean McGinnis,et al.  Nanocellulose Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[25]  H. M. Azeredo Nanocomposites for food packaging applications , 2009 .

[26]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Matthias Fischer,et al.  Effects on Life Cycle Assessment — Scale Up of Processes , 2007 .

[28]  Sabu Thomas,et al.  Cellulose Nanocomposites for High-Performance Applications , 2011 .

[29]  Marcelle C. McManus,et al.  Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.