Wireless Sensor Networks for Ecology

Abstract Field biologists and ecologists are starting to open new avenues of inquiry at greater spatial and temporal resolution, allowing them to “observe the unobservable” through the use of wireless sensor networks. Sensor networks facilitate the collection of diverse types of data (from temperature to imagery and sound) at frequent intervals—even multiple times per second—over large areas, allowing ecologists and field biologists to engage in intensive and expansive sampling and to unobtrusively collect new types of data. Moreover, real-time data flows allow researchers to react rapidly to events, thus extending the laboratory to the field. We review some existing uses of wireless sensor networks, identify possible areas of application, and review the underlying technologies in the hope of stimulating additional use of this promising technology to address the grand challenges of environmental science.

[1]  M. Lings,et al.  Articles , 1967, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[2]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  The Breeding Bird Survey: Its First Fifteen Years, 1965-1979 , 1987 .

[3]  Stuart H. Gage,et al.  Automated Identification of Flying Insects by Analysis of Wingbeat Frequencies , 1986 .

[4]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  Long-Term Research at the Virginia Coast Reserve , 1991 .

[5]  M. Kearney,et al.  A Rational Theory for Barrier-Lagoon Development , 1992 .

[6]  G. Kling,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Supersaturation in the Surface Waters of Lakes , 1994, Science.

[7]  Roger L. Peterson,et al.  Introduction to Spread Spectrum Communications , 1995 .

[8]  D. Young,et al.  Spatial and temporal growth dynamics of Barrier Island shrub thickets , 1995 .

[9]  G. Shao,et al.  Geomorphological controls on coastal vegetation at the Virginia Coast Reserve , 1995 .

[10]  R. Christian,et al.  Nitrogen cycling networks of coastal ecosystems: influence of trophic status and primary producer form , 1996 .

[11]  The Influence of Regional Phenomena on an Emerging Global Ecology , 1996 .

[12]  T. Kratz,et al.  Average annual carbon dioxide concentrations in eight neighboring lakes in northern Wisconsin, USA , 1997 .

[13]  S. Carpenter.  The Need for Large-Scale Experiments to Assess and Predict the Response of Ecosystems to Perturbation , 1998 .

[14]  Nadim Maluf,et al.  An Introduction to Microelectromechanical Systems Engineering , 2000 .

[15]  F. Day,et al.  Aboveground plant biomass change along a coastal barrier island dune chronosequence over a six-year period' , 2001 .

[16]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Video sensors play major role in subsea scientific missions , 2002 .

[17]  Kevin A. Delin.  The Sensor Web: A Macro-Instrument for Coordinated Sensing , 2002 .

[18]  ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY AT REGIONAL SCALES1 , 2002 .

[19]  Yong Wang,et al.  Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet , 2002, ASPLOS X.

[20]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: Introduction to Transportation Systems by Joseph Sussman. Boston: Artech House, 2000 , 2002 .

[21]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Dimensions: why do we need a new data handling architecture for sensor networks? , 2003, CCRV.

[22]  M. Harmon,et al.  Ecological Variability in Space and Time: Insights Gained from the US LTER Program , 2003 .

[23]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[24]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Lake metabolism: Relationships with dissolved organic carbon and phosphorus , 2003 .

[25]  D. Caron,et al.  The Growing Contributions of Molecular Biology and Immunology to Protistan Ecology: Molecular Signatures as Ecological Tools1 , 2004, The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology.

[26]  S. Beeby,et al.  MEMS Mechanical Sensors , 2004 .

[27]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Habitat monitoring with sensor networks , 2004, CACM.