Dissection videos do not improve anatomy examination scores

In this quasi‐experimental study, we describe the effect of showing dissection videos on first‐year medical students' performance in terms of test scores during a gross anatomy course. We also surveyed students' perception regarding the showing of dissection videos. Two hundred eighty‐seven first‐year medical students at Rawalpindi Medical College in Pakistan, divided into two groups, dissected one limb in first term and switched over to the other limb in the second term. During the second term, instruction was supplemented by dissection videos. Second‐term anatomy examination marks were compared with first‐term scores and with results from first‐year medical students in previous years. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed, with term scores (continuous, 0–200) as the dependent variable. Students shown dissection videos scored 1.26 marks higher than those not shown. The relationship was not statistically significant (95% CI: −1.11, 3.70; P = 0.314). Ninety‐three percent of students favored regular inclusion of dissection videos in curriculum, and 50% termed it the best source for learning gross anatomy. Seventy‐six percent of students did not perform regular cadaver dissection. The most frequent reason cited for not performing regular dissection was high student‐cadaver ratio. Dissection videos did not improve performance on final examination scores; however, students favored their use. Anat Sci Educ. © 2011 American Association of Anatomists.

[1]  A. Darzi,et al.  A minimally invasive approach to undergraduate anatomy teaching , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[2]  A. Winkelmann,et al.  Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence , 2007, Medical education.

[3]  Kathy A. Herzberger,et al.  Innovations in medical education , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  P. O'Sullivan,et al.  Effect of the use of instructional anatomy videos on student performance , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  A. Raftery,et al.  Undergraduate anatomy teaching in the UK , 2009 .

[6]  Robert B Trelease,et al.  Transforming clinical imaging data for virtual reality learning objects , 2008, Anatomical sciences education.

[7]  J. Ahmad,et al.  Development of instructional, interactive, multimedia anatomy dissection software: A student‐led initiative , 2005, Clinical anatomy.

[8]  A. Khurana,et al.  The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization , 2010, Anatomical sciences education.

[9]  Samy A. Azer,et al.  Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students , 2007, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[10]  J. McLachlan,et al.  Teaching anatomy without cadavers , 2004, Medical education.

[11]  J Older,et al.  Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. , 2004, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[12]  Kevin Kavanaugh,et al.  A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708 , 2004, BMC medical education.

[13]  H. Lempp,et al.  Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study , 2005, Medical education.

[14]  R. J. Cowie,et al.  The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[15]  J. Pereira,et al.  Using videoclips to improve theoretical anatomy teaching. , 2004 .

[16]  John A McNulty,et al.  Evaluation of computer‐aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six‐year study , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[17]  Patrick D. Bridge,et al.  The Effectiveness of Streaming Video on Medical Student Learning: A Case Study , 2009, Medical education online.

[18]  Kitt Shaffer,et al.  Teaching anatomy in the digital world. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  D. Patten,et al.  Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future , 2006, Medical education.

[20]  Parvati Dev,et al.  An analysis of technology usage for streaming digital video in support of a preclinical curriculum , 2000, AMIA.

[21]  Ismail Memon.  Anatomy education faces challenges in Pakistan , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[22]  R. Samuel,et al.  Problem-based learning: is anatomy a casualty? , 2005, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[23]  Lawrence J Rizzolo,et al.  Human dissection: An approach to interweaving the traditional and humanistic goals of medical education , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[24]  Amy Hoyt,et al.  An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses , 2009, BMC medical education.

[25]  Christopher Wenger,et al.  Anatomy in a New Curriculum: Facilitating the Learning of Gross Anatomy using Web Access Streaming Dissection Videos , 2006, Journal of visual communication in medicine.

[26]  Solomon,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Digital and Live Lecture Formats , 2004 .

[27]  Diane C. Calleson,et al.  The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: Are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection? , 2007, Clinical anatomy.

[28]  Anne Nevgi,et al.  Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? , 2007, Medical teacher.

[29]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Dissection in learning and teaching gross anatomy: rebuttal to McLachlan. , 2004, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[30]  W. Pawlina,et al.  Integrating professionalism in early medical education: The theory and application of reflective practice in the anatomy curriculum , 2006, Clinical anatomy.