A Model for Information Processing Capacity: Formalizing the Impact of Structural and Information System Choices on Organizational Performance

This paper proposes a formal model of information processing inorganizations. The model takes a process view of organizations and includesboth structural and IS features of processes. Two structural properties areconsidered, networking and parallelism. Information systems are representedin terms of quantity of information used and level of informationcustomization allowed. Process performance is measured in terms of totalinformation processing capacity and flexibility afforded by a process. Therelationship between structural and information system choices and processperformance is studied by simulating the model for a range of values. Thepaper derives a set of propositions describing the independent and combinedimpact of structural and information system choices on performance. The results suggest the predominance of networking over parallelism and ofinformation customization over information quantity in determininginformation processing capacity. They also show a negative effect ofnetworking on process flexibility and an amplifying effect of networking onthe benefits of information customization. Overall, the findings validatethe interdependence between structural and information system variables indetermining process performance.

[1]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[2]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[3]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Management misinformation systems , 1967 .

[4]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Organizational response: the cost performance tradeoff , 1997 .

[5]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[6]  M. Hammer,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1993 .

[7]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance and the Use of an Information System , 1975 .

[8]  George P. Huber,et al.  The Decision-Making Paradigm of Organizational Design , 1986 .

[9]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[10]  Steven L. Guengerich.  Downsizing information systems , 1992 .

[11]  Richard Leifer,et al.  A Framework for Linking the Structure of Information Systems with Organizational Requirements for Information Sharing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  H. Baligh.  Decision Rules and Transactions, Organizations and Markets , 1986 .

[13]  Rashi Glazer,et al.  Measuring the Value of Information: The Information-Intensive Organization , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[14]  K. Arrow.  The limits of organization , 1974 .

[15]  C. Goutis.  A graphical method for solving a decision analysis problem , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992 , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  G. Huber.  The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations , 1984 .

[18]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Computer information systems and organization structure , 1981, CACM.

[19]  R. A. Olsen.  Systems analysis and design for safety: Safety systems engineering.: David B. Brown. Prentice-Hall, Englewood cliffs, N.J. 06732, xiv, 399 p. $18.95 , 1978 .

[20]  L. Foulds,et al.  Graph Theory Applications , 1991 .

[21]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[22]  K. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization , 1988 .

[23]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a UniversityBudget. , 1974 .

[24]  P. Nystrom,et al.  Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization , 1976 .

[25]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[26]  P. Bolton,et al.  The firm as a communication network , 1994 .

[27]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Recent Applications of Economic Theory in Information Technology Research Recent Applications of Economic Theory in Information Technology Research , 2022 .

[28]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[29]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets , 1987 .

[30]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[31]  Yan Jin,et al.  The “virtual design team”: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance , 1994 .

[32]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[33]  J. Roberto Evaristo,et al.  Information Load Revisited: A Theoretical Model , 1995, ICIS.

[34]  W. Richard Scott.  Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems , 1981 .

[35]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[36]  Karl W. Deutsch,et al.  A Note on Hierarchy and Coordination: An Aspect of Decentralization , 1974 .

[37]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.