Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum

When observers are asked to localize the onset or the offset position of a moving target, they typically make localization errors in the direction of movement. Similarly, when observers judge a moving target that is presented in alignment with a flash, the target appears to lead the flash. These errors are known as the Fröhlich effect, representational momentum, and flash-lag effect, respectively. This study compared the size of the three mislocalization errors. In Experiment 1, a flash appeared either simultaneously with the onset, the mid-position, or the offset of the moving target. Observers then judged the position where the moving target was located when the flash appeared. Experiments 2 and 3 are exclusively concerned with localizing the onset and the offset of the moving target. When observers localized the position with respect to the point in time when the flash was presented, a clear mislocalization in the direction of movement was observed at the initial position and the mid-position. In contrast, a mislocalization opposite to movement direction occurred at the final position. When observers were asked to ignore the flash (or when no flash was presented at all), a reduced error (or no error) was observed at the initial position and only a minor error in the direction of the movement occurred at the final position. An integrative model is proposed, which suggests a common underlying mechanism, but emphasizes the specific processing components of the Fröhlich effect, flash-lag effect, and representational momentum.

[1]  John Ross,et al.  Visual processing of motion , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina , 1999, Nature.

[3]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129) , 1999 .

[4]  G. Aschersleben.  Task-dependent timing of perceptual events , 1999 .

[5]  T. Hubbard.  Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[6]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli , 1999 .

[7]  A H van der Heijden,et al.  Enhancing Single-Item Recognition Accuracy by Cueing Spatial Locations in Vision , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Action planning affects spatial localization , 2002 .

[9]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  Perception of oppositely moving verniers and spatio-temporal interpolation , 1995, Vision Research.

[10]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[11]  Odmar Neumann,et al.  Visuelles Fokussieren: Das Wetterwart-Modell und einige seiner Anwendungen , 1990 .

[12]  Markus Lappe,et al.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  Jennifer J. Freyd,et al.  Representational momentum when attention is divided , 2002 .

[14]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[15]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[16]  J. Bharucha,et al.  Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[18]  R Nijhawan,et al.  The Role of Attention in Motion Extrapolation: Are Moving Objects ‘Corrected’ or Flashed Objects Attentionally Delayed? , 2000, Perception.

[19]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  D Kerzel,et al.  The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Friedrich W. Fröhlich,et al.  Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1930 .

[22]  W. Metzger,et al.  Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1932 .

[23]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  A matter of design: No representational momentum without predictability , 2002 .

[24]  J. Findlay,et al.  The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[25]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): Evidence for an attention-shifting model , 1992, Psychological research.

[26]  M. Lappe,et al.  Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  D Jancke,et al.  Orientation Formed by a Spot's Trajectory: A Two-Dimensional Population Approach in Primary Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  David Whitney,et al.  Surrounding motion affects the perceived locations of moving stimuli , 2002 .

[30]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[31]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast , 1999, Vision Research.

[32]  T. Hubbard,et al.  Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.