Screening of HELQ in breast and ovarian cancer families
暂无分享,去创建一个
Heli Nevanlinna | Kristiina Aittomäki | Carl Blomqvist | Laura Kinnunen | Sofia Khan | H. Nevanlinna | K. Aittomäki | C. Blomqvist | Johanna I. Kiiski | L. Pelttari | Liisa M. Pelttari | Sofia Khan | J. Kiiski | Laura Kinnunen
[1] Richard D. Wood,et al. Human DNA helicase HELQ participates in DNA interstrand crosslink tolerance with ATR and RAD51 paralogs , 2013, Nature Communications.
[2] Päivi Heikkilä,et al. Correlation of CHEK2 protein expression and c.1100delC mutation status with tumor characteristics among unselected breast cancer patients , 2005, International journal of cancer.
[3] O. Kallioniemi,et al. Low proportion of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Finnish breast cancer families: evidence for additional susceptibility genes. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.
[4] M. Tarsounas,et al. RAD51 paralogs: roles in DNA damage signalling, recombinational repair and tumorigenesis. , 2011, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
[5] Montserrat Garcia-Closas,et al. Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer , 2010, Molecular oncology.
[6] O. Kallioniemi,et al. A CHEK2 genetic variant contributing to a substantial fraction of familial breast cancer. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.
[7] H. Nevanlinna,et al. Familial breast cancer in southern Finland: how prevalent are breast cancer families and can we trust the family history reported by patients? , 2000, European journal of cancer.
[8] K Holli,et al. Population-based study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in 1035 unselected Finnish breast cancer patients. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[9] S. Lees-Miller. Faculty Opinions recommendation of HELQ promotes RAD51 paralogue-dependent repair to avert germ cell loss and tumorigenesis. , 2013 .
[10] Päivi Heikkilä,et al. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 NQO1*2 genotype (P187S) is a strong prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer , 2008, Nature Genetics.
[11] Jana Marie Schwarz,et al. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations , 2010, Nature Methods.
[12] H. Nevanlinna,et al. A probability model for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast and breast-ovarian cancer families , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.
[13] Jaana M. Hartikainen,et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk , 2013, Nature Genetics.
[14] J. Schleutker,et al. RAD51C is a susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer. , 2011, Human molecular genetics.
[15] M. Stephens,et al. Accounting for Decay of Linkage Disequilibrium in Haplotype Inference and Missing-data Imputation , 2022 .
[16] F. Couch,et al. Exome sequencing identifies FANCM as a susceptibility gene for triple-negative breast cancer , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] V. Gaborieau,et al. Genetic variants in DNA repair pathways and risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancers: combined analysis of data from two genome-wide association studies in European populations. , 2014, Carcinogenesis.
[18] L. Aaltonen,et al. A Finnish founder mutation in RAD51D: analysis in breast, ovarian, prostate, and colorectal cancer , 2012, Journal of Medical Genetics.
[19] P. Donnelly,et al. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.
[20] Brooke L. Fridley,et al. GWAS meta-analysis and replication identifies three new susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer , 2013, Nature Genetics.
[21] A. D’Andrea,et al. Regulation of DNA cross-link repair by the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway. , 2012, Genes & development.