The Dynamics of Team Learning: Harmony and Rhythm in Teamwork Arrangements for Innovation

Innovation teams must navigate inherent tensions between different learning activities to produce high levels of performance. Yet, we know little about how teams combine these activities—notably reflexive, experimental, vicarious, and contextual learning—most effectively over time. In this article, we integrate research on teamwork episodes with insights from music theory to develop a new theoretical perspective on team dynamics, which explains how team activities can produce harmony, dissonance, or rhythm in teamwork arrangements that lead to either positive or negative effects on overall performance. We first tested our theory in a field study using longitudinal data from 102 innovation teams at a Fortune Global 500 company; then, we replicated and elaborated our theory in a study of 61 MBA project teams at an elite North American university. Results show that some learning activities can occur within the same teamwork episode to have harmonious positive effects on team performance, while other activities combine to have dissonant negative effects when occurring in the same episode. We argue that dissonant activities must be spread across teamwork episodes to help teams achieve a positive rhythm of team learning over time. Our findings contribute to theory on team dynamics, team learning, and ambidexterity.

[1]  Vijaya Venkataramani,et al.  When Does External Knowledge Benefit Team Creativity? The Role of Internal Team Network Structure and Task Complexity , 2023, Organization Science.

[2]  Ravi S. Kudesia,et al.  Experimentation in the Face of Ambiguity: How Mindful Leaders Develop Emotional Capabilities for Change in Teams , 2023, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[3]  J. Harvey EXPRESS: Microfoundations of Sensing Capabilities: From Managerial Cognition to Team Behavior , 2022, Strategic Organization.

[4]  Anna T. Mayo Syncing Up: A Process Model of Emergent Interdependence in Dynamic Teams , 2022, Administrative Science Quarterly.

[5]  C. Shalley,et al.  Building blocks of idea generation and implementation in teams: A Meta‐Analysis of team design and team creativity and innovation , 2022, Personnel Psychology.

[6]  G. Pisano,et al.  A Strategic View of Team Learning in Organizations , 2022, Academy of Management Annals.

[7]  Matthew T. Luth,et al.  Help! My team failed: How conducting a premortem can influence group perceptions and outcomes , 2022, The International Journal of Management Education.

[8]  J. Harvey,et al.  Constructive feedback: When leader agreeableness stifles team reflexivity , 2022, Personality and Individual Differences.

[9]  Christopher G. Myers Storytelling as a Tool for Vicarious Learning among Air Medical Transport Crews , 2021, Administrative Science Quarterly.

[10]  Elizabeth A. Klock,et al.  Indexing dynamic collective constructs using computer-aided text analysis: Construct validity evidence and illustrations featuring team processes. , 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[11]  K. Law,et al.  Paradoxical Leadership and Innovation in Work Teams: The Multilevel Mediating Role of Ambidexterity and Leader Vision as a Boundary Condition , 2021 .

[12]  U. Konradt,et al.  Teams in Transition: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study of Reflection, Implicit and Explicit Coordination and Performance Improvements , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[13]  Christopher W. Wiese,et al.  Team Learning Behaviors and Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Direct Effects and Moderators , 2021, Group & Organization Management.

[14]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions , 2020, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Patricia Satterstrom,et al.  The Voice Cultivation Process: How Team Members Can Help Upward Voice Live on to Implementation , 2020 .

[16]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  The Development and Construct Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure , 2020, Organizational Research Methods.

[17]  J. Harvey,et al.  Beyond Separate Emergence: A Systems View of Team Learning Climate , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[18]  J. Shaw,et al.  New Ways of Seeing: Theory Integration across Disciplines , 2018 .

[19]  Christopher G. Myers Coactive Vicarious Learning: Toward a Relational Theory of Vicarious Learning in Organizations , 2017, Academy of Management Review.

[20]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations , 2017, Human Resource Management Review.

[21]  Sujin Jang Cultural Brokerage and Creative Performance in Multicultural Teams , 2017, Organ. Sci..

[22]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Understanding “It Depends” in Organizational Research , 2017 .

[23]  Lameez Alexander,et al.  Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective , 2014, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  A. Edmondson EXTREME TEAMING , 2017 .

[25]  Pier Vittorio Mannucci,et al.  From Creativity to Innovation: The Social Network Drivers of the Four Phases of the Idea Journey , 2017 .

[26]  Linda Argote,et al.  Knowledge Utilization, Coordination, and Team Performance , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  A Socio‐Psychological Perspective on Team Ambidexterity: The Contingency Role of Supportive Leadership Behaviours , 2016 .

[28]  G. Shieh Choosing the best index for the average score intraclass correlation coefficient , 2016, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning , 2016 .

[30]  N. Bozionelos,et al.  Ambidexterity and Unit Performance: Intellectual Capital Antecedents and Cross-Level Moderating Effects of Human Resource Practices , 2015 .

[31]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Team Reflexivity as an Antidote to Team Information-Processing Failures , 2014 .

[32]  S. McComb,et al.  When teams shift among processes: insights from simulation and optimization. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Creativity in Organizations , 2014 .

[34]  J. Hackman,et al.  A theory of team coaching , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[36]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[37]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  The Structural Context of Team Learning: Effects of Organizational and Team Structure on Internal and External Learning , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[38]  M. Gibbert,et al.  The Influence of Material Resources on Innovation Projects: The Role of Resource Elasticity , 2013 .

[39]  Henrik Bresman Changing Routines: A Process Model of Vicarious Group Learning in Pharmaceutical R&D , 2013 .

[40]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance , 2012 .

[41]  Jean-Francois Harvey,et al.  Managing organizational memory with intergenerational knowledge transfer , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[42]  Laurie R. Weingart,et al.  Dynamics in Groups: Are We There Yet? , 2011 .

[43]  Yuqing Ren,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems 1985–2010: An Integrative Framework of Key Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences , 2011 .

[44]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  Why Turnover Matters in Self-Managing Work Teams: Learning, Social Integration, and Task Flexibility , 2010 .

[45]  T. Elfring,et al.  How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. , 2010 .

[46]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[47]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Power Asymmetry and Learning in Teams: The Moderating Role of Performance Feedback , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[48]  J. A. Marrone Team Boundary Spanning: A Multilevel Review of Past Research and Proposals for the Future , 2010 .

[49]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[50]  C. Savelsbergh,et al.  The Development and Empirical Validation of a Multidimensional Measurement Instrument for Team Learning Behaviors , 2009 .

[51]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective , 2009 .

[52]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[53]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies between Formal and Informal Organization , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[54]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Product Development and Learning in Project Teams: The Challenges Are the Benefits* , 2009 .

[55]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[56]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[59]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Testing Mediation and Suppression Effects of Latent Variables , 2008 .

[60]  Jay B. Carson,et al.  A Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents and Consequences of Team Member Boundary-Spanning Behavior , 2007 .

[61]  A. Edmondson,et al.  6 Three Perspectives on Team Learning: Outcome Improvement, Task Mastery, and Group Process , 2007 .

[62]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[63]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge ☆ , 2007 .

[64]  Anita L. Tucker,et al.  Implementing New Practices: An Empirical Study of Organizational Learning in Hospital Intensive Care Units , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[65]  C. Dreu Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: a motivated information processing perspective. , 2007 .

[66]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  Introduction Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 2007 .

[67]  Ahuva Weiss-Meilik,et al.  Briefing‐debriefing: Using a reflexive organizational learning model from the military to enhance the performance of surgical teams , 2007 .

[68]  F. Tschan,et al.  Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models , 2007 .

[69]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[70]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[71]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[72]  Giacomo Negro,et al.  Filling Empty Seats: How Status and Organizational Hierarchies Affect Exploration Versus Exploitation in Team Design , 2006 .

[73]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[74]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems, Learning, and Learning Transfer , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[75]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[76]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[77]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[78]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[79]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[80]  L. Dyer,et al.  Right from the Start: Exploring the Effects of Early Team Events on Subsequent Project Team Development and Performance , 2004 .

[81]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[82]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[83]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[84]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Team learning: collectively connecting the dots. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[85]  Jeremy F. Dawson,et al.  DO WE HAVE ENOUGH? THE ACCURACY OF INCOMPLETE DATA FROM SMALL GROUPS. , 2003 .

[86]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[87]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[88]  Caroline A. Bartel,et al.  Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. , 2003 .

[89]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning How and Learning What: Effects of Tacit and Codified Knowledge on Performance Improvement Following Technology Adoption , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[90]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[91]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  The Restriction of Variance Hypothesis and Interrater Reliability and Agreement: Are Ratings from Multiple Sources Really Dissimilar? , 2003 .

[92]  Geoffrey G. Bell,et al.  Timing and Music , 2002 .

[93]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Growth Modeling Using Random Coefficient Models: Model Building, Testing, and Illustrations , 2002 .

[94]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[95]  M. West Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[96]  Gilad Chen,et al.  The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: evidence for discontinuity. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[97]  Jin Nam Choi External Activities and Team Effectiveness , 2002 .

[98]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[99]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[100]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[101]  R. Keller,et al.  Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes , 2001 .

[102]  E. Salas,et al.  Reflections on shared cognition , 2001 .

[103]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[104]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building , 2000 .

[105]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[106]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[107]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[108]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[109]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[110]  Michael A. West,et al.  Reflexivity, Effectiveness, and Mental Health in BBC-TV Production Teams , 1998 .

[111]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry , 1998 .

[112]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[113]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[114]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[115]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[116]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[117]  C. E. Willis,et al.  A methodological and substantive note on the performance-cue effect in ratings of work-group behavior. , 1995 .

[118]  L. Weingart,et al.  Group goals and group performance , 1993 .

[119]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. , 1993 .

[120]  J. Barker Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[121]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[122]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[123]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[124]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[125]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[126]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing , 1991 .

[127]  Deborah G. . Ancona Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[128]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[129]  C. Gersick MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[130]  K. Bollen A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models , 1989 .

[131]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[132]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams. , 1987 .

[133]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[134]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[135]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .