Pelvis Runner: Visualizing Pelvic Organ Variability in a Cohort of Radiotherapy Patients

In radiation therapy, anatomical changes in the patient might lead to deviations between the planned and delivered dose— including inadequate tumor coverage, and overradiation of healthy tissues. Exploring and analyzing anatomical changes throughout the entire treatment period can help clinical researchers to design appropriate treatment strategies, while identifying patients that are more prone to radiation-induced toxicity. We present the Pelvis Runner, a novel application for exploring the variability of segmented pelvic organs in multiple patients, across the entire radiation therapy treatment process. Our application addresses (i) the global exploration and analysis of pelvic organ shape variability in an abstracted tabular view and (ii) the local exploration and analysis thereof in anatomical 2D/3D views, where comparative and ensemble visualizations are integrated. The workflow is based on available retrospective cohort data, which incorporate segmentations of the bladder, the prostate, and the rectum through the entire radiation therapy process. The Pelvis Runner is applied to four usage scenarios, which were conducted with two clinical researchers, i.e., medical physicists. Our application provides clinical researchers with promising support in demonstrating the significance of treatment plan adaptation to anatomical changes. CCS Concepts • Human-centered computing → Visual analytics; • Applied computing → Life and medical sciences;

[1]  Geoff Delaney,et al.  The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment , 2005, Cancer.

[2]  Junpeng Wang,et al.  Visualization and Visual Analysis of Ensemble Data: A Survey , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  Semantically steered visual analysis of highly detailed morphometric shape spaces , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization (BioVis)..

[4]  Kai Lawonn,et al.  Interactive Visual Analysis of Image-Centric Cohort Study Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Dynamic Volume Lines: Visual Comparison of 3D Volumes through Space-filling Curves , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Comparative Visual Analysis of Pelvic Organ Segmentations , 2018, EuroVis.

[7]  Ivan Viola,et al.  Interactive illustrative visualization of hierarchical volume data , 2010, Graphics Interface.

[8]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  Accurate Interactive Visualization of Large Deformations and Variability in Biomedical Image Ensembles , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Visual Analytics of Image-Centric Cohort Studies in Epidemiology , 2015, Visualization in Medicine and Life Sciences III.

[10]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  Contour Boxplots: A Method for Characterizing Uncertainty in Feature Sets from Simulation Ensembles , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Jürgen Bernard,et al.  A Visual-Interactive System for Prostate Cancer Cohort Analysis , 2015, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[12]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  SMARTexplore: Simplifying High-Dimensional Data Analysis through a Table-Based Visual Analytics Approach , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[13]  Vitali Moiseenko,et al.  Effect of bladder filling on doses to prostate and organs at risk: a treatment planning study , 2007, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[15]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Subpopulation Discovery and Validation in Epidemiological Data , 2017, EuroVA@EuroVis.

[16]  J. Deasy,et al.  Associations between volume changes and spatial dose metrics for the urinary bladder during local versus pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[17]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Image-based rendering of intersecting surfaces for dynamic comparative visualization , 2011, The Visual Computer.

[18]  J. IIVARINENHelsinki Efficiency of Simple Shape Descriptors , 1997 .

[19]  Silvia Miksch,et al.  Characterizing Guidance in Visual Analytics , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Szymon Rusinkiewicz,et al.  Rotation Invariant Spherical Harmonic Representation of 3D Shape Descriptors , 2003, Symposium on Geometry Processing.

[21]  L. Schultz,et al.  Geometric and dosimetric impact of anatomical changes for MR‐only radiation therapy for the prostate , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[22]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  Curve Boxplot: Generalization of Boxplot for Ensembles of Curves , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Charl P. Botha,et al.  Eurographics/ Ieee-vgtc Symposium on Visualization 2010 Dynamic Multi-view Exploration of Shape Spaces , 2022 .

[24]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  A Visual Analytics Approach to Study Anatomic Covariation , 2014, 2014 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium.

[25]  Arjan Bel,et al.  A voxel-based finite element model for the prediction of bladder deformation. , 2011, Medical physics.

[26]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Interactive Coordinated Multiple-View Visualization of Biomechanical Motion Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[27]  M. Stella Atkins,et al.  Visualization of time-varying MRI data for MS lesion analysis , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  Arjan Bel,et al.  Finite element based bladder modeling for image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer. , 2010, Medical physics.

[29]  Kai Lawonn,et al.  Visualization and Analysis of Lumbar Spine Canal Variability in Cohort Study Data , 2013, VMV.

[30]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Streamline Variability Plots for Characterizing the Uncertainty in Vector Field Ensembles , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[31]  Rajat J Kudchadker,et al.  A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  Te Vuong,et al.  Past, present, and future of radiotherapy for the benefit of patients , 2013, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  State‐of‐the‐Art Report: Visual Computing in Radiation Therapy Planning , 2019, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[34]  D. Hilbert Über die stetige Abbildung einer Linie auf ein Flächenstück , 1935 .

[35]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  A visual analytics perspective on shape analysis: State of the art and future prospects , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[36]  J. Reiber,et al.  Integrated Visual Analysis for Heterogeneous Datasets in Cohort Studies , 2010 .

[37]  Cynthia A. Brewer,et al.  ColorBrewer.org: An Online Tool for Selecting Colour Schemes for Maps , 2003 .

[38]  L. Muren,et al.  Organ motion, set-up variation and treatment margins in radical radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[39]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Time-Hierarchical Clustering and Visualization of Weather Forecast Ensembles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[40]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Bladder Runner: Visual Analytics for the Exploration of RT‐Induced Bladder Toxicity in a Cohort Study , 2018, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[41]  M. Eble,et al.  Prostate position variability and dose-volume histograms in radiotherapy for prostate cancer with full and empty bladder. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  Daniel F. Keefe,et al.  Comparison techniques utilized in spatial 3D and 4D data visualizations: A survey and future directions , 2017, Comput. Graph..

[43]  Nick White,et al.  Principles and Practice of Radiation Therapy , 2009 .

[44]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Visual Analysis of Spatial Variability and Global Correlations in Ensembles of Iso‐Contours , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[45]  C. Lawton Radiation dose–volume effects of the urinary bladder , 2011 .

[46]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Reproducibility of the bladder shape and bladder shape changes during filling. , 2005, Medical physics.

[47]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis , 2014, ArXiv.

[48]  Michael Wimmer,et al.  YMCA — Your mesh comparison application , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[49]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[50]  Pascal Haigron,et al.  Population model of bladder motion and deformation based on dominant eigenmodes and mixed‐effects models in prostate cancer radiotherapy , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[51]  Stefan Wesarg,et al.  Visual Analytics for model-based medical image segmentation: Opportunities and challenges , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..