Effect of island geometry on the replay signal in patterned media storage

In a move to extend the storage capabilities of magnetic storage systems beyond 1 Tb/in/sup 2/, the use of patterned media has often been cited. Here, recorded domains are constrained by the geometry of the magnetic island and not the geometry of the recording head. Conventional two-dimensional readout modeling techniques, using the reciprocity integral, rely on the assumption that the across-track medium magnetization is uniform under the giant magnetoresistive replay head. However, in the case of a geometrically constrained medium this is not the case. This work investigates the effect that the island geometry has on the characteristics of the replay signal in perpendicular patterned magnetic media storage through the extension of the reciprocity integral to three dimensions. The paper describes replay pulses that offer different characteristics from those obtained by conventional two-dimensional techniques. The origins of these differences are explained by the variation in medium magnetization across the track.

[1]  S. Chou,et al.  Quantum magnetic disk , 1996 .

[2]  Robert L. White,et al.  The physical boundaries to high-density magnetic recording , 2000 .

[3]  H. Bertram,et al.  Thermal decay in high density disk media , 1998 .

[4]  Yihong Wu,et al.  Flux-enhanced giant magnetoresistance head design and simulation , 2002 .

[5]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Thermal decay of signal and noise in high-density thin-film media , 1999 .

[6]  Eric E. Fullerton,et al.  Magnetic recording: advancing into the future , 2002 .

[7]  J. Bain,et al.  Considerations In The Design Of Probe Heads For 100 Gbit/in/sup 2/ Recording Density , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG'97).

[8]  A. Moser,et al.  Thermal effect limits in ultrahigh-density magnetic recording , 1999 .

[9]  A. Taratorin,et al.  Magnetic Information Storage Technology , 1999 .

[10]  G.F. Hughes.  Read channels for patterned media , 1999, IEEE International Magnetics Conference.

[11]  Sakhrat Khizroev,et al.  Parallels between playback in perpendicular and longitudinal recording , 2003 .

[12]  D. Mapps,et al.  Improved approximations for two-dimensional perpendicular magnetic recording heads , 2003 .

[13]  Bruce Alexander Wilson,et al.  Simulation of the off-track capability of a one terabit per square inch recording system , 2002 .

[14]  Erol Girt,et al.  How antiferromagnetic coupling can stabilize recorded information , 2002 .

[15]  S. K. Nair,et al.  Patterned media recording: Noise and channel equalization , 1998 .

[16]  Physics of perpendicular magnetic recording: writing process , 2002 .

[17]  G.F. Hughes.  Read channels for pre-patterned media, with trench playback , 2003, Digest of INTERMAG 2003. International Magnetics Conference (Cat. No.03CH37401).

[18]  J. Miles,et al.  Approximate three-dimensional head fields for perpendicular magnetic recording , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[19]  Jaap J. M. Ruigrok,et al.  Short-Wavelength Magnetic Recording: New Methods and Analyses , 1990 .

[20]  H. N. Bertram,et al.  Pulse shape, resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio in perpendicular recording , 2002 .

[21]  S. Charap,et al.  Thermal stability of recorded information at high densities , 1996 .

[22]  J. Zhu,et al.  The role of SUL in readback and effect on linear density performance for perpendicular recording , 2003 .

[23]  R. Pease,et al.  Patterned media: a viable route to 50 Gbit/in/sup 2/ and up for magnetic recording? , 1997 .

[24]  Jian-Gang Zhu,et al.  Recording, noise, and servo characteristics of patterned thin film media , 2000 .

[25]  R. Potter,et al.  Digital magnetic recording theory , 1974 .

[26]  H. Neal Bertram,et al.  Theory of Magnetic Recording , 1994 .

[27]  Mourad Benakli,et al.  One terabit per square inch perpendicular recording conceptual design , 2002 .