Assessing the usability of remote control servos for admittance-controlled haptic finger manipulators

Robotic devices that are able to manipulate the fingers can support the study of robot-assisted motor learning. Currently no devices are available that provide a transparent haptic environment and provide a platform to study motor learning. To cut down on costs it is proposed to use remote control (RC) servos with admittance control. In this study five RC servos are tested to evaluate their controller and passive dynamic properties. Frequency and step response are evaluated and passive dynamics are estimated using a model fit. With a fitted frequency response, system stability is evaluated for different human impedances. The high speed servos have lowest passive inertia (2·10-4 kgm2) and highest bandwidth (20 Hz). The communication protocol of RC servos causes a delay of more than 5 ms from change in setpoint to change in output. Stability analysis shows that the high speed servos have largest stability regions. Simulations show that reducing the virtual inertia and damping makes the system more susceptible to unstable behavior. At this moment however the passive dynamics of the setup are more transparent than the virtual inertia (1·10-3 kgm2) and damping that can be simulated with an admittance controller. A possible cause lies with the communication delay and high gearing present in RC servos.

[1]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Finger Impedance Evaluation by Means of Hand Exoskeleton , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Devin L Jindrich,et al.  Finger joint impedance during tapping on a computer keyswitch. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Moonhong Baeg,et al.  Development of a low cost anthropomorphic robot hand with high capability , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  M. A. Peshkin,et al.  Inertia Compensation Control of a One-Degree-of-Freedom Exoskeleton for Lower-Limb Assistance: Initial Experiments , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Time-Domain Passivity Control of Haptic Interfaces with Tunable Damping Hardware , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[6]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  A force-controlled planar haptic device for movement control analysis of the human arm , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Justin B. Rowe,et al.  Design and preliminary evaluation of the FINGER rehabilitation robot: controlling challenge and quantifying finger individuation during musical computer game play , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Some current issues in haptics research , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[9]  Tetsuro Yabuta,et al.  Dynamic movement by admittance control of a multi-finger-arm robot with manipulability control of fingers , 2013, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration.

[10]  R. Howe,et al.  Identification of the mechanical impedance at the human finger tip. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Neville Hogan,et al.  An analysis of contact instability in terms of passive physical equivalents , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Piet Lammertse,et al.  HapticMaster - a generic force controlled robot for human interaction , 2003, Ind. Robot.

[13]  Massimo Bergamasco,et al.  High performance explicit force control for finger interaction haptic interface , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[14]  O. Missenard,et al.  Moving faster while preserving accuracy , 2011, Neuroscience.

[15]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Stable haptic interaction with virtual environments , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Hand kinematics of piano playing. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Principles of sensorimotor learning , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  E. Burdet,et al.  Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[19]  Haruhisa Kawasaki,et al.  Design and Control of Five-Fingered Haptic Interface Opposite to Human Hand , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[20]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  T. Milner,et al.  HandCARE: A Cable-Actuated Rehabilitation System to Train Hand Function After Stroke , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Arno H. A. Stienen,et al.  ServoSEA concept: Cheap, miniature series-elastic actuators for orthotic, prosthetic and robotic hands , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.