Environmental labeling and consumers' choice--an empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan

Provision of information on the environmental effects of consumption is often put forward as an appealing alternative to traditional means of environmental regulation such as permits and environmental taxes. When consumers in opinion polls are asked if their purchasing decisions would be influenced by information on environmental or ethical aspects of products, the majority seem very ready to say yes. However, evidence for actual behavior along these lines is still limited. The paper presents an empirical analysis of the effect of a certified environmental label (the Nordic Swan), using a large Danish consumer panel with detailed information on actual purchases from the beginning of 1997 to January 2001 (weekly observations). In 1997, few products with the Nordic Swan label were available on the Danish market, as Denmark did not join the program of the other Nordic countries until April, 1997. Since then a considerable number of brands of different products in the Danish market have obtained the label, and the data includes information on purchases before and after a number of brands obtained the Swan label. In the paper we use a multinomial logit model to quantify the effect of the Swan label on consumers' choices among different brands of toilet paper, paper towels and detergents. It does appear that the Nordic Swan label has had a significant effect on Danish consumers' brand choices for toilet paper and detergents, corresponding to a willingness to pay for the certified environmental label of 10-17% of price of the labelled products. Results are less conclusive for paper towels, but the environmental label appears to have had less influence on the brand choice for the user of paper towels. .

[1]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  Karine Nyborg,et al.  Homo Economicus and Homo Politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values , 2000 .

[3]  Robert L. Hicks,et al.  Can Eco-Labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labeling , 2002 .

[4]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[5]  Aaditya Mattoo,et al.  Eco‐Labelling: Policy Considerations , 1994 .

[6]  K. Train Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[7]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Yea-saying and Validation of a Choice Model of Green Product Choice , 2001 .

[8]  B. Roe,et al.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[9]  J. Variyam,et al.  INFORMATIONAL EFFECTS OF NUTRIENT INTAKE DETERMINANTS ON CHOLESTEROL CONSUMPTION , 1998 .

[10]  Mario F. Teisl,et al.  Ecocertification: Why It May Not Be a “Field of Dreams” , 1999 .

[11]  J. Andreoni Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism , 1988 .

[12]  B. Roe US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[13]  J. Andreoni Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion? , 1995 .

[14]  B. Frey,et al.  The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out , 1997 .

[15]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[16]  J. Hamilton Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data , 1995 .

[17]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection , 1998 .

[18]  P. Stern Information, Incentives, and Proenvironmental Consumer Behavior , 1999 .

[19]  John W. Maxwell,et al.  'Voluntary' Approaches to Environmental Regulation: A Survey , 1999 .

[20]  K. E. Henion,et al.  The Effect of Ecologically Relevant Information on Detergent Sales , 1972 .

[21]  Mette Wier,et al.  Market potential for organic foods in Europe , 2002 .

[22]  Frances Cairncross,et al.  Costing the Earth: The Challenge for Governments, the Opportunities for Business , 1992 .

[23]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[24]  C. Keser Cooperation in Public Goods Experiments , 2002 .

[25]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies , 2000 .

[26]  J. Herriges,et al.  Inducing Patterns of Correlation and Substitution in Repeated Logit Models of Recreation Demand , 2002 .

[27]  Roger A. Sedjo,et al.  Eco-Labeling Consequences in General Equilibrium: A Graphical Assessment , 2000 .

[28]  U. Epa,et al.  Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics , 2000 .

[29]  Edward R. Morey,et al.  A Repeated Nested-Logit Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing , 1993 .

[30]  R. Nayga,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FOOD LABEL USE ON NUTRIENT INTAKES: AN ENDOGENOUS SWITCHING REGRESSION ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[31]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? : Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program , 1996 .

[32]  T. Cason,et al.  Environmental Labeling and Incomplete Consumer Information in Laboratory Markets , 2002 .

[33]  Clifford S. Russell,et al.  The Effect of the Nordic Swan Label on Consumers' Choice , 2002 .

[34]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[35]  J. Herriges,et al.  Controlling for Correlation Across Choice Occasions and Sites in a Repeated Mixed Logit Model of Recreation Demand , 2000 .

[36]  John Beghin,et al.  Are Eco‐Labels Valuable? Evidence from the Apparel Industry , 1999 .

[37]  R. Nayga,et al.  Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels While Food Shopping and At Home , 1998 .

[38]  Kenneth E. McConnell,et al.  Does Altruism Undermine Existence Value , 1997 .

[39]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions , 1997 .

[40]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[41]  Stefanie Kirchhoff,et al.  Green Business and Blue Angels , 2000 .

[42]  Michele Moretto,et al.  Is Ecolabelling a Reliable Environmental Policy Measure? , 1999 .

[43]  T. Palva,et al.  Pages 53-65 , 2001 .

[44]  John W. Maxwell,et al.  Pollution Policy: The Role for Publicly Provided Information , 1994 .

[45]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[46]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Reassessing Brand Loyalty, Price Sensitivity, and Merchandising Effects on Consumer Brand Choice , 1995 .

[47]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Green Product Choice , 2001 .