Reliability and validity of the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) to measure functional limitations in patients with foot and ankle disorders.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[4]  M Sullivan,et al.  Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  J. Ware,et al.  Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  J E Ware,et al.  Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  J E Ware,et al.  Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  G Atkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine , 1998, Sports medicine.

[9]  F. Salaffi,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  D. Grayson,et al.  Some Myths and Legends in Quantitative Psychology , 2004 .

[11]  B. Gandek,et al.  The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  D. Fithian,et al.  Outcome instruments for patellofemoral arthroplasty. , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  R. Burdett,et al.  Evidence of Validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[14]  E. Roos,et al.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese versions of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in Asians with knee osteoarthritis in Singapore. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  J. Irrgang,et al.  A survey of self-reported outcome instruments for the foot and ankle. , 2007, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[16]  P. Fayers,et al.  Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes , 2007 .

[17]  W. Duquet,et al.  The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: A systematic review , 2007, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[18]  L. Michener,et al.  Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part II: clinical outcomes assessment. , 2008, Journal of athletic training.

[19]  RobRoy L Martin,et al.  Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure in athletes with chronic ankle instability. , 2008, Journal of athletic training.

[20]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: a validation study from Iran , 2010, Clinical Rheumatology.

[21]  H. Lohrer,et al.  Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability , 2009, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[22]  D. M. Hutt,et al.  Validity of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in Diabetes Mellitus , 2009, Foot & ankle international.