Dissociations in Performance on Novel Versus Irregular Items: Single-Route Demonstrations With Input Gain in Localist and Distributed Models
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Clahsen,et al. Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[2] Royal Skousen,et al. Analogical Modeling Of Language , 1989 .
[3] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .
[4] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Dissociating types of mental computation , 1997, Nature.
[5] Kim Kirsner,et al. What Can we Infer from Double Dissociations? , 2003, Cortex.
[6] Joan L. Bybee. Phonology and Language Use , 2004, Phonetica.
[7] John J. L. Morton,et al. Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .
[8] Yves Chauvin,et al. Backpropagation: the basic theory , 1995 .
[9] S. Petersen,et al. A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[10] M. Coltheart. Phonological dyslexia: Past and future issues. , 1996 .
[11] James L. McClelland,et al. Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? , 2003 .
[12] Randall C. O'Reilly,et al. Generalization in Interactive Networks: The Benefits of Inhibitory Competition and Hebbian Learning , 2001, Neural Computation.
[13] D. Shanks,et al. Neuropsychological Dissociations between Priming and Recognition: a Single-system Connectionist Account , 2003 .
[14] R. Nosofsky. Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification , 1990 .
[15] M. Behrmann,et al. Surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: dual routes, single lexicon , 1992 .
[16] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[17] B. Hayes,et al. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.
[18] Thomas H. Carr,et al. The brain is not single-minded about inflectional morphology: A response to the commentaries , 2003, Brain and Language.
[19] R. Glushko. The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .
[20] James L. McClelland,et al. Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge , 2001, Neuropsychologia.
[21] S. Blumstein,et al. Self-Organizing Dynamics of Lexical Access in Normals and Aphasics , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[22] D. Plaut,et al. The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[23] G. Miller,et al. Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.
[24] S. Pinker,et al. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.
[25] M T Ullman,et al. The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[26] T. Bever,et al. The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning—A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models , 1988, Cognition.
[27] E. Funnell. Phonological processes in reading: new evidence from acquired dyslexia. , 1983, British journal of psychology.
[28] Steven Pinker,et al. The Nature of Regularity and Irregularity: Evidence from Hebrew Nominal Inflection , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[29] James L. McClelland,et al. ‘Words or Rules’ cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] K. Patterson. Phonological ALEXIA or PHONOLOGICAL alexia , 1995 .
[31] Janice Kay,et al. One Process, Not Two, in Reading Aloud: Lexical Analogies Do the Work of Non-Lexical Rules , 1981 .
[32] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. A general framework for parallel distributed processing , 1986 .
[33] Barak A. Pearlmutter. Gradient calculations for dynamic recurrent neural networks: a survey , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[34] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Language learning and innateness: Some implications of Compounds Research , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.
[35] S. Pinker,et al. A Neural Dissociation within Language: Evidence that the Mental Dictionary Is Part of Declarative Memory, and that Grammatical Rules Are Processed by the Procedural System , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[36] Richard J. Brown. Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .
[37] S. Sloman. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .
[38] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[39] Christopher T. Kello,et al. The Emergence of a Double Dissociation in the Modulation of a Single Control Parameter in a Nonlinear Dynamical System , 2003, Cortex.
[40] D. Medin,et al. The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction: Volume 5 , 1989 .
[41] Jean-Marc Fellous,et al. Computational Models of Neuromodulation , 1998, Neural Computation.
[42] S E Shaywitz,et al. Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.
[43] S. Pinker. Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language , 1999 .
[44] U. Hahn,et al. German Inflection: Single Route or Dual Route? , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.
[45] James L. McClelland,et al. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[46] Simon A. J. Winder. A model for biological winner-take-all neural competition employing inhibitory modulation of NMDA-mediated excitatory gain , 1999, Neurocomputing.
[47] Bruce F. Pennington,et al. What do double dissociations prove? , 2001, Cogn. Sci..
[48] J. Hodges,et al. Deterioration of word meaning: Implications for reading , 1992, Neuropsychologia.
[49] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[50] Karalyn Patterson,et al. Selective disorders of reading? , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[51] R. Sternberg. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .
[52] Christopher T. Kello,et al. Strategic control in word reading: evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[53] David C. Plaut,et al. Strategic Control Over Rate of Processing in Word Reading: A Computational Investigation of the Tempo-Naming Task , 2000 .
[54] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[55] John R. Anderson,et al. The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[56] P. Juola. Double dissociations and neurophysiological expectations. , 2000, Brain and cognition.
[57] Paul W. B. Atkins,et al. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .
[58] James L. McClelland,et al. Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .
[59] S. Pinker,et al. The past and future of the past tense , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[60] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Category-Specific Semantic Deficits in Focal and Widespread Brain Damage: A Computational Account , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[61] W. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Rules, representations, and the English past tense , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[62] D. Plaut. Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.