M2M infrastructure to integrate humans, agents and robots into collectives

Organizations are pervasive in all aspects of human society. Most large-scale goals are carried out through the cooperation of a group of humans typically working with technologies such as robots and machines. The main goal of this research is the creation of a model and architecture to support networking, communication, interaction, organization and collective intelligence features between machines, robots, software agents, and humans. The model will allow each of these actors to cooperatively work together to accomplish large-scale goals. While machines, robots, software agents and humans are very different in their capabilities, embodiment and inherent behaviors, a core goal is to make them indistinguishable in terms of acting in an organization. When a robot communicates to another actor, it is not concerned with the physical makeup of that actor, only in its ability to solve a goal or execute a task. The goal of indistinguishable actors is not at the level of a Turing test, it gives the organization the flexibility to act as an open system, where the actors can come and exit as needed by the requirements of the overall goal set.

[1]  Cory Q. Nguyen,et al.  Using autonomous robots to enable self-organizing broadband networks , 2010, ICCAS 2010.

[2]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[3]  Emiliano Lorini,et al.  Towards a Logical Model of Social Agreement for Agent Societies , 2009, COIN@AAMAS&IJCAI&MALLOW.

[4]  Olivier Boissier,et al.  A Model-Based Architecture for Organizational Interoperability in Open Multiagent Systems , 2009, COIN@AAMAS&IJCAI&MALLOW.

[5]  Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu,et al.  Role Model Based Mechanism for Norm Emergence in Artificial Agent Societies , 2007, COIN.

[6]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  Minds, Machines and Turing , 2000, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[7]  Olivier Boissier,et al.  MOISE+: towards a structural, functional, and deontic model for MAS organization , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[8]  S. Harnad Minds, Machines and Turing: The Indistinguishability of Indistinguishables , 2000 .

[9]  Scott A. DeLoach,et al.  A capabilities-based model for adaptive organizations , 2008, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[10]  Scott A. DeLoach,et al.  Evaluation of properties in the transition of capability based agent organization , 2009, Web Intell. Agent Syst..

[11]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  A parallel processing architecture for sensor-based control of intelligent mobile robots , 1996, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[12]  Laurent Vercouter,et al.  A Peer-to-Peer Normative System to Achieve Social Order , 2006, COIN@AAMAS/ECAI.

[13]  Yan Meng,et al.  Autonomous Self-Reconfiguration of Modular Robots by Evolving a Hierarchical Mechanochemical Model , 2011, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[14]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  First, scale up to the robotic Turing test, then worry about feeling , 2008, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[15]  Raj K. Bhatnagar,et al.  Transition in multiagent organizations , 2008 .

[16]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[17]  Juan Pablo Wachs,et al.  AWARE: Autonomous Wireless Agent Robotic Exchange , 2010, ICIRA.