Genetic specificity of face recognition

Significance Diverse cognitive abilities have typically been found to intercorrelate highly and to be strongly influenced by genetics. Recent twin studies have suggested that the ability to recognize human faces is an exception: it is similarly highly heritable, but largely uncorrelated with other abilities. However, assessing genetic relationships—the degree to which traits are influenced by the same genes—requires very large samples, which have not previously been available. This study, using data from more than 2,000 twins, shows for the first time, to our knowledge, that the genetic influences on face recognition are almost entirely unique. This finding provides strong support for the view that face recognition is “special” and may ultimately illuminate the nature of cognitive abilities in general. Specific cognitive abilities in diverse domains are typically found to be highly heritable and substantially correlated with general cognitive ability (g), both phenotypically and genetically. Recent twin studies have found the ability to memorize and recognize faces to be an exception, being similarly heritable but phenotypically substantially uncorrelated both with g and with general object recognition. However, the genetic relationships between face recognition and other abilities (the extent to which they share a common genetic etiology) cannot be determined from phenotypic associations. In this, to our knowledge, first study of the genetic associations between face recognition and other domains, 2,000 18- and 19-year-old United Kingdom twins completed tests assessing their face recognition, object recognition, and general cognitive abilities. Results confirmed the substantial heritability of face recognition (61%), and multivariate genetic analyses found that most of this genetic influence is unique and not shared with other cognitive abilities.

[1]  Galit Yovel,et al.  A Robust Method of Measuring Other-Race and Other-Ethnicity Effects: The Cambridge Face Memory Test Format , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  R. Plomin,et al.  Infant zygosity can be assigned by parental report questionnaire data , 2000, Twin Research.

[3]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetic influence on language delay in two-year-old children , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  James G. Scott,et al.  The relationship between executive functioning and verbal and visual learning and memory. , 2004, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[5]  S. Petrill Molarity Versus Modularity of Cognitive Functioning? , 1997 .

[6]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Human Cognitive Abilities , 2015 .

[7]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[8]  P. Vernon,et al.  Verbal and spatial abilities are uncorrelated when g is controlled , 1995 .

[9]  Maria Chiara Passolunghi,et al.  The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children , 2011 .

[10]  R. Plomin,et al.  Quantitative genetics in the era of molecular genetics: learning abilities and disabilities as an example. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[11]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age , 2012, Nature.

[12]  John C. Loehlin,et al.  The Cholesky approach: A cautionary note , 1996 .

[13]  T. Alloway,et al.  The predictive ability of IQ and Working Memory scores in literacy in an adult population , 2013 .

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Pak Chung Sham,et al.  Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models , 2002, Briefings Bioinform..

[17]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetics and general cognitive ability (g) , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  D. Goleman Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships , 2006 .

[19]  John Fox,et al.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework , 2011, Psychometrika.

[20]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Alan Slater,et al.  Development of Face Processing Expertise , 2011 .

[22]  R. Plomin,et al.  Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): A Genetically Sensitive Investigation of Cognitive and Behavioral Development From Childhood to Young Adulthood , 2012, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[23]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Let’s face it: It’s a cortical network , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Generalist genes: implications for the cognitive sciences , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Heritability of the Specific Cognitive Ability of Face Perception , 2010, Current Biology.

[26]  Corwin Boake,et al.  Genes Determine Stability and the Environment Determines Change in Cognitive Ability During 35 Years of Adulthood , 2009, Psychological science.

[27]  Matt McGue,et al.  Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex , 1984, Behavior genetics.

[28]  B. Duchaine,et al.  The Cambridge Car Memory Test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects , 2012, Behavior research methods.

[29]  Robert Plomin,et al.  The nature and nurture of cognitive abilities. , 1988 .

[30]  E. McKone,et al.  A strong role for nature in face recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.