Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy

In this paper, we present and validate a framework, based on deformable image registration, for automatic processing of serial three-dimensional CT images used in image-guided radiation therapy. A major assumption in deformable image registration has been that, if two images are being registered, every point of one image corresponds appropriately to some point in the other. For intra-treatment images of the prostate, however, this assumption is violated by the variable presence of bowel gas. The framework presented here explicitly extends previous deformable image registration algorithms to accommodate such regions in the image for which no correspondence exists. We show how to use our registration technique as a tool for organ segmentation, and present a statistical analysis of this segmentation method, validating it by comparison with multiple human raters. We also show how the deformable registration technique can be used to determine the dosimetric effect of a given plan in the presence of non-rigid tissue motion. In addition to dose accumulation, we describe a method for estimating the biological effects of tissue motion using a linear-quadratic model. This work is described in the context of a prostate treatment protocol, but it is of general applicability.

[1]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Effects of motion on the total dose distribution. , 2004, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[2]  T. Mackie,et al.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  J. Unkelbach,et al.  Inclusion of organ movements in IMRT treatment planning via inverse planning based on probability distributions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  M Goitein,et al.  Calculation of the uncertainty in the dose delivered during radiation therapy. , 1985, Medical physics.

[5]  David J Brenner,et al.  Hypofractionation for prostate cancer radiotherapy--what are the issues? , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Jeremy T. Booth,et al.  Modeling the impact of treatment uncertainties in radiotherapy , 2002 .

[8]  Peter Lorenzen,et al.  Structural and radiometric asymmetry in brain images , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  On The Geometry and Shape of Brain Sub-Manifolds , 1997, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[10]  G. Starkschall,et al.  Assessment of consistency in contouring of normal‐tissue anatomic structures , 2003, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[11]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A framework for computational anatomy , 2002 .

[12]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  L. Younes,et al.  On the metrics and euler-lagrange equations of computational anatomy. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[14]  C. Davatzikos Spatial normalization of 3D brain images using deformable models. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[17]  D Yan,et al.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  C H Ketting,et al.  Consistency of three-dimensional planning target volumes across physicians and institutions. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  F Nüsslin,et al.  Adapting inverse planning to patient and organ geometrical variation: algorithm and implementation. , 2003, Medical physics.

[22]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Computing Large Deformation Metric Mappings via Geodesic Flows of Diffeomorphisms , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Quality assessment of medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  J. Fowler The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. , 1989, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  J H Hendry,et al.  Hypofractionation for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Sunghee Choi,et al.  The power crust , 2001, SMA '01.

[28]  D. Yan,et al.  A model to accumulate fractionated dose in a deforming organ. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Jake Van Dyk,et al.  The impact of geometric uncertainty on hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  G. Barendsen,et al.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  U. Grenander,et al.  Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline , 1998 .

[33]  M. Benson,et al.  External beam radiation therapy does not offer long-term control of prostate cancer. , 1996, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[34]  C Clifton Ling,et al.  A study of the effects of internal organ motion on dose escalation in conformal prostate treatments. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[35]  U. Grenander,et al.  Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Rick Chappell,et al.  Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? , 2001 .

[37]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[38]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[39]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[40]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[41]  M Goitein,et al.  Immobilization error: some theoretical considerations. , 1975, Radiology.

[42]  Publishers Ireland,et al.  Comparison of treatment techniques for lung cancer , 1993 .

[43]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Preliminary observations on biochemical relapse-free survival rates after short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy/fraction) for localized prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  M Goitein,et al.  Causes and consequences of inhomogeneous dose distributions in radiation therapy. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  G S Bauman,et al.  Tracking the dose distribution in radiation therapy by accounting for variable anatomy , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.