A Decade of Prevalence Surveys in a Tertiary-Care Center: Trends in Nosocomial Infection Rates, Device Utilization, and Patient Acuity

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of repeated prevalence surveys to determine trends in the rates of nosocomial infections and to detect changes in risk factors (eg, use of invasive devices) associated with nosocomial infections. Patients And Methods: Ten annual prevalence surveys were conducted by trained infection control practitioners between 1985 and 1995 for acute-care patients on the medical, surgical, pediatric, and obstetric-gynecologic services at a 900-bed, tertiary-care, teaching hospital with 750 acute-care beds. The same methods of chart review and concurrent reporting from nursing, the microbiology and clinical laboratory, and the pharmacy were used each year to collect data on the prevalence of nosocomial infections, invasive-device utilization, and abnormal laboratory indicators. Although data were collected on a single day, a period-prevalence study approach was used, because charts were reviewed for any infection data occurring within the 7 days prior to the survey. Results: The hospital census for acute-care patients, as measured by the prevalence surveys, declined sharply over the 10 years, from 673 to 575 patients (P=.02). However, the medical service census increased from 150 to 188 patients (P=.01). During the same period, there was a significant decrease in the mean length of stay, from 7.3 to 6.0 days (P=.01), and a concomitant increase in the mean diagnosis-related-group case-mix index, from 1.03 to 1.24 (P=.001). Overall, nosocomial infection rates remained unchanged over the study period (mean of 9.85 infections per 100 patients), but rates of nosocomial bloodstream infection increased from 0.0% in 1985 to 2.3% in 1995 (P=.05). Nosocomial infection rates were significantly higher on the medical and surgical services than on other services (P<.001). Utilization rates increased significantly for Foley catheters (9.0% to 16.0%, P=.002) and ventilators (5.0% to 8.0%, P=.05). Conclusions: Despite apparent increases in the severity of illness of our patients, overall rates of nosocomial infection remained stable during a decade of study. Rates of nosocomial bloodstream infection increased, in parallel with National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System data. We found repeated prevalence surveys to be useful in following trends and rates of infection, device utilization, and abnormal laboratory values among patients at our institution. Such methodologies can be valuable and low-cost components of a comprehensive infection surveillance, prevention, and control program and other potential quality-improvement initiatives, because they enable better annual planning of departmental strategies to meet hospital needs

[1]  J. Vincent,et al.  The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. , 1995, JAMA.

[2]  J E Enstone,et al.  The Second National Prevalence Survey of infection in hospitals: methodology. , 1995, The Journal of hospital infection.

[3]  P. de Micco,et al.  Prevalence surveys of nosocomial infections using a random sampling method in Marseille hospitals. , 1995, The Journal of hospital infection.

[4]  H. Kamel,et al.  Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection among Health Care Workers Who Donate Blood , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Prevalence of hospital-acquired infections in Spain. EPINE Working Group. , 1992, The Journal of hospital infection.

[6]  Nosocomial Infection Rates for Interhospital Comparison: Limitations and Possible Solutions , 1991, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[7]  W J Martone,et al.  Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Gaynes,et al.  The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System: plans for the 1990s and beyond. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Burke,et al.  Infection and Antibiotic Use in a Community Hospital, 1971-1990 , 1991, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[10]  G. L. French,et al.  REPEATED PREVALENCE SURVEYS FOR MONITORING EFFECTIVENESS OF HOSPITAL INFECTION CONTROL , 1989, The Lancet.

[11]  B. Yangco,et al.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. , 1989, American journal of infection control.

[12]  J M Hughes,et al.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. , 1988, American journal of infection control.

[13]  J. M. Hughes,et al.  Nosocomial Infection Surveillance in the United States: Historical Perspective , 1987, Infection Control.

[14]  J. Mcgowan,et al.  Day-specific incidence of nosocomial infection estimated from a prevalence survey. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  G. Ayliffe,et al.  Report on the National Survey of Infection in Hospitals, 1980. , 1981 .

[16]  W. Sudderth,et al.  Incidence and prevalence as used in the analysis of the occurrence of nosocomial infections. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  G. Hutchison,et al.  Prevalence, incidence and duration. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  M. Finland,et al.  Infection and antibiotic usage at Boston City Hospital: changes in prevalence during the decade 1964-1973. , 1974, The Journal of infectious diseases.