Device Configuration and Patient’s Body Composition Significantly Affect RF Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI: An Experimental Study at 1.5T and 3T

Patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices have limited access to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to safety concerns associated with RF heating generated around the implant. The problem of predicting RF heating of conductive leads is complex with a large parameter space and several interplaying factors. Recently however, off-label use of MRI in patients with DBS devices has been reported based on limited safety assessments, raising the concern that potentially dangerous scenarios may have been overlooked. In this work, we present results of a systematic assessment of RF heating of a commercial DBS device during MRI at 1.5T and 3T, taking into account the effect of device configuration, imaging landmark, and patient’s body composition. Ninety-six (96) RF heating measurements were performed using anthropomorphic phantoms implanted with a full DBS system. We evaluated eight clinically relevant device configurations, implanted in phantoms with different material compositions, and imaged at three different landmarks (head, shoulder, and lower chest) in 1.5 T and 3T scanners. We observed a substantial fluctuation in the RF heating depending on phantom’s composition and device configuration. RF heating in the brain-mimicking gel varied from 0.1°C to 12°C during 1.5 T MRI and from <0.1°C to 4.5°C during 3T MRI. We also observed that certain device configurations consistently reduced RF heating across different phantom compositions, imaging landmarks, and MRI transmit frequencies.

[1]  Ashwini Sharan,et al.  Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: In vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging–related heating at 1.5 tesla , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  G. Bonmassar,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Realistic Lead Trajectories and an Experimental Verification Support the Efficacy of Parallel Radiofrequency Transmission to Reduce Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants during MRI , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Tanweer Rashid,et al.  On the (Non‐)equivalency of monopolar and bipolar settings for deep brain stimulation fMRI studies of Parkinson's disease patients , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Bhumi Bhusal,et al.  Measurements and simulation of RF heating of implanted stereo‐electroencephalography electrodes during MR scans , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P Bartolini,et al.  Temperature and SAR measurement errors in the evaluation of metallic linear structures heating during MRI using fluoroptic® probes , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Maria Ida Iacono,et al.  Local SAR near deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes at 64 and 127 MHz: A simulation study of the effect of extracranial loops , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Giorgio Bonmassar,et al.  RF-induced heating in tissue near bilateral DBS implants during MRI at 1.5 T and 3T: The role of surgical lead management , 2019, NeuroImage.

[8]  J. Pilitsis,et al.  Reconfigurable MRI coil technology can substantially reduce RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants: First in-vitro study of RF heating reduction in bilateral DBS leads at 1.5 T , 2019, PloS one.

[9]  E. Atalar,et al.  RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants in open‐bore vertical MRI systems: A simulation study with realistic device configurations , 2020, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  M. Ladd,et al.  MR safety: Fast T1 thermometry of the RF‐induced heating of medical devices , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Construction and modeling of a reconfigurable MRI coil for lowering SAR in patients with deep brain stimulation implants , 2017, NeuroImage.

[12]  Azma Mareyam,et al.  Feasibility of using linearly polarized rotating birdcage transmitters and close‐fitting receive arrays in MRI to reduce SAR in the vicinity of deep brain simulation implants , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  L. Angelone,et al.  Radio-Frequency Safety Assessment of Stents in Blood Vessels During Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[14]  Bryan M. Li,et al.  Functional MRI Safety and Artifacts during Deep Brain Stimulation: Experience in 102 Patients. , 2019, Radiology.

[15]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[16]  Kevan J T Anderson,et al.  Parallel radiofrequency transmission at 3 tesla to improve safety in bilateral implanted wires in a heterogeneous model , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Giorgio Bonmassar,et al.  Changes in the specific absorption rate (SAR) of radiofrequency energy in patients with retained cardiac leads during MRI at 1.5T and 3T , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Jean A. Tkach,et al.  Reduction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-related Heating in Deep Brain Stimulation Leads Using a Lead Management Device , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Steven McCabe,et al.  A Novel Implant Electrode Design Safe in the RF Field of MRI Scanners , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[20]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Reconfigurable MRI technology for low-SAR imaging of deep brain stimulation at 3T: Application in bilateral leads, fully-implanted systems, and surgically modified lead trajectories , 2019, NeuroImage.