Assessment of frequency selectivity with psychoacoustic masking curves

Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and narrow-band masking curves (NMCs) were obtained for three frequencies: 500, 1600, and 2500 Hz, using the Bekesy tracking method. Comparisons of the data obtained for seven normal and one slightly impaired ears indicate that PTCs measured at 20 dB SL and NMCs measured at 40 dB SL seem to be equally effective in describing frequency selectivity using Q(10) criterion. Therefore, the choice of either methodology for assessment of frequency resolution may be dictated by its convenience and avilable instrumentation. Due to dependence of PTCs and NMCs on signal presentation level, the conclusions of this study are limited to normally hearing listeners. It is yet to be shown whether and within what range of hearing loss both measures can be treated as equivalent at higher presentation level.

[1]  S Buus,et al.  Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  M E Lutman,et al.  Speech identification under simulated hearing-aid frequency response characteristics in relation to sensitivity, frequency resolution, and temporal resolution. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[4]  Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al.  Perception of second-formant transitions by hearing-impaired persons. , 1980 .

[5]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  E F Evans,et al.  Early detection of hearing damage in young listeners resulting from exposure to amplified music. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[8]  R. Freyman,et al.  Effects of stimulus level on forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and in noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P Bonding Frequency selectivity and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[10]  D A Nelson,et al.  High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking with different noise bandwidths. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves in normal-hearing listeners: test reliability and probe level effects. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  C. Turner,et al.  The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  James Jerger,et al.  Masking by Octave Bands of Noise in Normal and Impaired Ears , 1960 .

[14]  J M Pickett,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss and upward spread of masking. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  W. Melnick,et al.  A clinically feasible method for determining frequency resolution. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.