New strategies for flexibility analysis and design under uncertainty

Abstract Process flexibility and design under uncertainty have been researched extensively in the literature. Problem formulations for flexibility include nested optimization problems and these can often be refined by substituting the optimality conditions for these nested problems. However, these reformulations are highly constrained and can be expensive to solve. In this paper we extend algorithms to solve these reformulated NLP problem under uncertainty by introducing two contributions to this approach. These are the use of a Constraint Aggregation function (KS function) and Smoothing Functions. We begin with basic properties of KS function. Next, we review a class of parametric smooth functions, used to replace the complementarity conditions of the KKT conditions with a well-behaved, smoothed nonlinear equality constraint. In this paper we apply the previous strategies to two specific problems: i) the'worst case algorithm', that assesses design under uncertainty and, ii) the flexibility index and feasibility test formulations. In the first case, two new algorithms are derived, one of them being single level optimization problem. Next using similar ideas, both flexibility index and feasibility test are reformulated leading to a single non linear programming problem instead of a mixed integer non linear programming one. The new formulations are demonstrated on five different example problems where a CPU time reduction of more than 70 and 80% is demonstrated.

[1]  J. A. Bandoni,et al.  Economic impact of disturbances and uncertain parameters in chemical processes—A dynamic back-off analysis , 1996 .

[2]  Olvi L. Mangasarian,et al.  A class of smoothing functions for nonlinear and mixed complementarity problems , 1996, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[3]  Parisa A. Bahri,et al.  Operability assessment in chemical plants , 1996 .

[4]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Structural sizing by generalized, multilevel optimization , 1987 .

[5]  John D. Perkins,et al.  Operability and Control in Process Synthesis and Design , 1996 .

[6]  J. A. Bandoni,et al.  Effect of disturbances in optimizing control: Steady‐state open‐loop backoff problem , 1996 .

[7]  J. A. Bandoni,et al.  On optimising control and the effect of disturbances: Calculation of the open-loop backoffs , 1994 .

[8]  John J.J. Chen.  Comments on improvements on a replacement for the logarithmic mean , 1987 .

[9]  Reinhold Steinhauser,et al.  Application of vector performance optimization to a robust control loop design for a fighter aircraft , 1983 .

[10]  C. Floudas,et al.  Active constraint strategy for flexibility analysis in chemical processes , 1987 .

[11]  G. M. Ostrovsky,et al.  Flexibility analysis and optimization of chemical plants with uncertain parameters , 1994 .

[12]  J. A. Bandoni,et al.  Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes , 1997 .

[13]  D. M. Stimler,et al.  Majorization: a computational complexity reduction technique in control system design , 1988 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimum design of chemical plants with uncertain parameters , 1978 .

[15]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimization strategies for flexible chemical processes , 1983 .

[16]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part I , 1983 .

[17]  An efficient outer approximations algorithm for solving infinite sets of inequalities , 1990, 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  A technique for locating function roots and for satisfying equality constraints in optimization , 1992 .

[19]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part I: Formulation and theory , 1985 .

[20]  E. Polak.  An implementable algorithm for the optimal design centering, tolerancing, and tuning problem , 1982 .

[21]  On the optimal design centering, tolerancing, and tuning problem , 1985 .