Evaluation of two serological methods for potency testing of whole cell pertussis vaccines.

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) and the World Health Organization (WHO) require the performance of extensive quality control testing including a potency test before a vaccine batch is released for human use. Whole cell pertussis (wP) vaccine potency is assessed by a mouse protection test (MPT) based on the Kendrick test. This test compares the vaccine dose necessary to protect 50% of mice against the effect of a lethal intracerebral dose of Bordetella pertussis and the dose of a suitable reference vaccine needed to give the same protection level. Due to the large variability in the results of this test and the severe distress which is inflicted on the many animals involved, its replacement by an alternative method is highly desirable. At the initiative of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM) of the Council of Europe, in collaboration with the WHO and the In-vitro toxicology Unit/European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) of the European Commission (EC) Joint Research Centre-Institute for Health and Consumer Protection (JRC-IHCP), wP vaccine specialists from all over the world were invited to present an overview of candidate alternatives at a symposium organised in Geneva (Switzerland) in March 2005. Although no alternative method was found suitable for immediate implementation of batch potency control, the Pertussis Serological Potency Test (PSPT), initially developed in mice and recently transferred to guinea pigs (gps), was identified as a model of interest. Using the PSPT in gps to test several components of combined vaccines such as Diphtheria-Tetanus-wP vaccines in the same animal series would allow further implementation of the European 3Rs policy to batch potency control, by additional method refinement and reduction of animal use. The present study evaluated 2 features of the serological response to wP vaccination: 1) the overall antibody response as measured by a "whole cell" ELISA (PSPT-wC-ELISA) which uses the B. pertussis 18323 challenge strain prescribed for the MPT to coat the assay plates and 2) the functional neutralising antibodies to pertussis toxin (PT, one of the main virulence factors of B. pertussis), as measured by the Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell assay. The results showed that 1) the gp model can be used for wP vaccine potency testing; 2) despite good repeatability and precision, the CHO cell assay did not generate results comparable to the MPT. Moreover, the CHO cell assay showed significant differences in the ability of wP vaccines to induce neutralising anti-PT antibodies, which did not correlate to the overall antibody response evaluated by PSPT-wC-ELISA; 3) comparable potencies were obtained in the MPT and the PSPT-wC-ELISA. This study, supported by the previous ones correlating the PSPT-wC-ELISA in mice with the MPT, confirms that PSPT-wC-ELISA in gps is a promising approach for batch release potency testing of wP vaccines for which consistency in production has already been demonstrated by the MPT. However, a large scale validation study is required prior to the adoption of PSPT-wC-ELISA as a compendial reference method for wP vaccines batch release control.

[1]  N. Høiby,et al.  Cross-reactions between Bordetella pertussis and twenty-eight other bacterial species. , 2009, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology.

[2]  L. Nielsen,et al.  Elimination of Interfering Activity in Serum Samples in the Chinese Hamster Ovary Pertussis Serology Assay , 2008, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[3]  Michael Balls,et al.  Guidance on Good Cell Culture Practice , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[4]  N. Carbonetti,et al.  Pertussis Toxin and Adenylate Cyclase Toxin Provide a One-Two Punch for Establishment of Bordetella pertussis Infection of the Respiratory Tract , 2005, Infection and Immunity.

[5]  P. Rehbinder,et al.  Recommendations for the health monitoring of rodent and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units , 2002, Laboratory animals.

[6]  R. Schneerson,et al.  Immunologic and epidemiologic experience of vaccination with a monocomponent pertussis toxoid vaccine. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[7]  R. G. Das,et al.  Laboratory testing of whole cell pertussis vaccine: a WHO proficiency study using the Kendrick test. , 2001, Vaccine.

[8]  M. Corbel,et al.  Third International Standard for pertussis vaccine: international confirmation study of activity of British Standard for pertussis vaccine, coded 66/303. , 2001, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.

[9]  M. Corbel,et al.  Investigation of an aerosol challenge model as alternative to the intracerebral mouse protection test for potency assay of whole cell pertussis vaccines. , 2000, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.

[10]  M. Corbel,et al.  Investigation of cellular and humoral immune responses to whole cell and acellular pertussis vaccines. , 2000, Vaccine.

[11]  S. Salmaso,et al.  Cell-mediated immunity and antibody responses to Bordetella pertussis antigens in children with a history of pertussis infection and in recipients of an acellular pertussis vaccine. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  K. Enssle,et al.  The Pertussis Serological Potency Test. Collaborative study to evaluatereplacement of the Mouse Protection Test. , 1999, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.

[13]  J. van der Gun,et al.  Collaborative study on test systems to assess toxicity of whole cell pertussis vaccine. , 1997, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.

[14]  D Greco,et al.  A controlled trial of two acellular vaccines and one whole-cell vaccine against pertussis. Progetto Pertosse Working Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Reed,et al.  Relationships between functional assays and enzyme immunoassays as measurements of responses to acellular and whole-cell pertussis vaccines. , 1995, Pediatrics.

[16]  A. V. D. van der Ark,et al.  Development of pertussis serological potency test. Serological assessment of antibody response induced by whole cell vaccine as an alternative to mouse protection in an intracerebral challenge model. , 1994, Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization.

[17]  R. Boot,et al.  An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for monitoring rodent colonies for Streptobacillus moniliformis antibodies , 1993, Laboratory animals.

[18]  R. Boot,et al.  An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for monitoring guineapigs and rabbits for Bordetella bronchiseptica antibodies , 1993, Laboratory animals.

[19]  E. Hewlett,et al.  Genetic diversity and relationships in populations of Bordetella spp , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  P L Kendrick,et al.  Mouse Protection Tests in the Study of Pertussis Vaccine: A Comparative Series Using the Intracerebral Route for Challenge. , 1947, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[21]  P. Rigsby,et al.  Collaborative study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of diphtheria toxoid vaccines - extended study: correlation of serology with in vivo toxin neutralisation. , 2004, Pharmeuropa bio.

[22]  Pharmeuropa Bio Collaborative study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of tetanus toxoid vaccines for human use. , 2002, Pharmeuropa. Special issue biologicals.

[23]  M. Corbel,et al.  Development of a nitric oxide induction assay as a potential replacement for the intracerebral mouse protection test for potency assay of pertussis whole cell vaccines. , 1999, Developments in biological standardization.

[24]  M. Granström,et al.  The standardization of an assay for pertussis toxin and antitoxin in microplate culture of Chinese hamster ovary cells. , 1985, Journal of biological standardization.