Measurement Equivalence Of 10 Value Types From The Schwartz Value Survey Across 21 Countries

Equivalence of measurement across cultures is a prerequisite for the generalization of an instrument. The measurement equivalence of 10 value types derived from Schwartz's structural model of values and measured with the Schwartz Value Survey questionnaire is evaluated in 21 countries. Based on previous research by Schwartz and colleagues, the measurement equivalence of the 10 value types is tested separately using nested multigroup confirmatory factor analyses. Results indicate that it is possible for most value types to reach acceptable levels of configural and metric equivalence; only the dimension of Hedonism is rejected at these two levels of equivalence. Four value types (Benevolence, Conformity, Self-Direction, and Universalism) also show factor variance equivalence. The hypotheses of scalar and reliability equivalence are rejected for all value types. Indications are also given of the number of items to be included for measuring the value types at the different levels of equivalence.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  H. Bozdogan.  Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions , 1987 .

[3]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. , 1990 .

[4]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[5]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[6]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Identifying Culture-Specifics in the Content and Structure of Values , 1995 .

[7]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Toward A Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values , 1987 .

[8]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. , 1995 .

[9]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection in Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[10]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality , 1989 .

[11]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[12]  J. H. Steiger.  Statistically based tests for the number of common factors , 1980 .

[13]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[14]  I. Borg.  Multidimensional similarity structure analysis , 1987 .

[15]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement , 2001 .

[16]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  Multivariate Methods for the Comparison of Factor Structures in Cross-Cultural Research , 2000 .

[17]  M. Bond,et al.  Hofstede's Culture Dimensions , 1984 .

[18]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[19]  Valerie Braithwaite,et al.  Structure of human values: testing the adequacy of the Rokeach value survey , 1985 .

[20]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Methods and data analysis of comparative research , 1997 .

[21]  H. Koot,et al.  Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Child Behavior Checklist Cross-Informant Syndromes. , 1994 .

[22]  R. Hoyle.  Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[23]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[24]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[25]  L. Guttman.  A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points , 1968 .

[26]  W. Doise,et al.  Organizing principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities , 1998 .

[27]  S. Mulaik.  Toward a Conception of Causality Applicable to Experimentation and Causal Modeling. , 1987 .

[28]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. , 1988 .

[29]  M. Browne,et al.  Automated Fitting of Nonstandard Models. , 1992, Multivariate behavioral research.

[30]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Measurement models for the Schwartz values. , 1993 .

[31]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Assessing Extreme and Acquiescence Response Sets in Cross-Cultural Research Using Structural Equations Modeling , 2000 .

[32]  K. Bollen.  A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models , 1989 .

[33]  T. Little.  Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues. , 1997, Multivariate behavioral research.

[34]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[35]  P. Bentler.  Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models , 1990 .

[36]  Carol R. Ember,et al.  Cross-Cultural Research Methods , 2000 .

[37]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[38]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Value Consensus and Importance , 2000 .

[39]  S. Iwawaki,et al.  Cross-Cultural Comparability of Temperament Among Japanese and American Preschool Children , 1988 .

[40]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[41]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies , 1995 .

[42]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[43]  M. Rokeach,et al.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[44]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[45]  Thierry Devos,et al.  Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[46]  楊國樞,et al.  Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-Free Dimensions of Culture , 1987 .

[47]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[48]  Values, national identification and favouritism towards the in-group , 1994 .

[49]  Roger E. Millsap,et al.  Doing the Four-Step Right , 2000 .