Are multiple speed cameras more effective than a single one? Causal analysis of the safety impacts of multiple speed cameras.

Most previous studies investigate the safety effects of a single speed camera, ignoring the potential impacts from adjacent speed cameras. The mutual influence between two or even more adjacent speed cameras is a relevant attribute worth taking into account when evaluating the safety impacts of speed cameras. This paper investigates the safety effects of two or more speed cameras observed within a specific radius which are defined as multiple speed cameras. A total of 464 speed cameras at treated sites and 3119 control sites are observed and related to road traffic accident data from 1999 to 2007. The effects of multiple speed cameras are evaluated using pairwise comparisons between treatment units with different doses based on the propensity score methods. The spatial effect of multiple speed cameras is investigated by testing various radii. There are two major findings in this study. First, sites with multiple speed cameras perform better in reducing the absolute number of road accidents than those with a single camera. Second, speed camera sites are found to be most effective with a radius of 200 m. For a radius of 200 m and 300 m, the reduction in the personal injury collisions by multiple speed cameras are 21.4 % and 13.2 % more than a single camera. Our results also suggest that multiple speed cameras are effective within a small radius (200 m and 300 m).

[1]  Charles Goldenbeld,et al.  The effects of speed enforcement with mobile radar on speed and accidents. An evaluation study on rural roads in the Dutch province Friesland. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Safety evaluation of continuous green T intersections: A propensity scores-genetic matching-potential outcomes approach. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Geert Wets,et al.  Behavioural effects of fixed speed cameras on motorways: overall improved speed compliance or kangaroo jumps? , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Arnab Majumdar,et al.  The impacts of speed cameras on road accidents: an application of propensity score matching methods. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  M J Maher,et al.  Are speed enforcement cameras more effective than other speed management measures? The impact of speed management schemes on 30 mph roads. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Walkable neighborhoods and obesity: Evaluating effects with a propensity score approach , 2017, SSM - population health.

[7]  Daniel J Graham,et al.  Do speed cameras reduce road traffic collisions? , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  Emmanuelle Amoros,et al.  Under-reporting of road crash casualties in France. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Causal inference framework for generalizable safety effect estimates. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[11]  J. Robins,et al.  Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data , 1995 .

[12]  Alena Høye.  Safety effects of section control--an empirical Bayes evaluation. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Comparison of safety effect estimates obtained from empirical Bayes before-after study, propensity scores-potential outcomes framework, and regression model with cross-sectional data. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Application of propensity scores and potential outcomes to estimate effectiveness of traffic safety countermeasures: Exploratory analysis using intersection lighting data. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Xiaoyan Huo,et al.  Effects of freeway climbing lane on crash frequency: Application of propensity scores and potential outcomes , 2019 .

[16]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Estimating the safety effects of lane widths on urban streets in Nebraska using the propensity scores-potential outcomes framework. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Ward Vanlaar,et al.  Impact evaluation of camera enforcement for traffic violations in Cali, Colombia, 2008-2014. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  D. Stephens,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Inference for Doubly Robust Estimation , 2016 .

[20]  Til Stürmer,et al.  The role of the c‐statistic in variable selection for propensity score models , 2011, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[21]  Stuart Newstead,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE CRASH EFFECTS OF THE QUEENSLAND SPEED CAMERA PROGRAM IN THE YEARS 2001-2003 , 2003 .

[22]  Ie-Bin Lian,et al.  Using propensity score adjustment method in genetic association studies , 2016, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[23]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[24]  Haojie Li,et al.  Heterogeneous treatment effects of speed cameras on road safety. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Alessandro Maffioli,et al.  A Primer for Applying Propensity-Score Matching , 2010 .

[26]  B. Sianesi,et al.  PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing , 2003 .

[27]  Laurent Carnis.  Speed enforcement in France: a decade of changes (2000-2009) , 2010 .

[28]  Lorenzo Moreno,et al.  Propensity Score Matching , 2008 .

[29]  D. Graham,et al.  Comparison of empirical Bayes and propensity score methods for road safety evaluation: A simulation study. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Laurent Carnis,et al.  An assessment of the safety effects of the French speed camera program. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  Geert Wets,et al.  An evaluation of the traffic safety effect of fixed speed cameras , 2014 .

[33]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Effects on Accidents of Automatic Speed Enforcement in Norway , 1997 .

[34]  Alena Høye.  Safety effects of fixed speed cameras - An empirical Bayes evaluation. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[36]  Kirsten Vallmuur,et al.  Estimating under-reporting of road crash injuries to police using multiple linked data collections. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  S M Christie,et al.  Are mobile speed cameras effective? A controlled before and after study , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[38]  Rune Elvik,et al.  An Empirical Bayes before-after evaluation of road safety effects of a new motorway in Norway. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  Vittorio Marzano,et al.  Effects on speed and safety of point-to-point speed enforcement systems: evaluation on the urban motorway A56 Tangenziale di Napoli. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Safety Effects of Automated Speed Enforcement Programs , 2008 .

[41]  C. Muntaner,et al.  The effect of unemployment benefits on health: A propensity score analysis. , 2019, Social science & medicine.

[42]  Kangwon Shin,et al.  Evaluation of the Scottsdale Loop 101 automated speed enforcement demonstration program. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[43]  Ömür Kaygısız,et al.  Effects of fixed speed cameras on spatio-temporal pattern of traffic crashes: Ankara case , 2019 .

[44]  Helai Huang,et al.  Road network safety evaluation using Bayesian hierarchical joint model. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[45]  D B Rubin,et al.  Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. , 1996, Biometrics.

[46]  Max Cameron.  Development of strategies for best practice in speed enforcement in Western Australia: supplementary report , 2008 .

[47]  Laurent Carnis,et al.  Improving the safety effect of speed camera programs through innovations: Evidence from the French experience. , 2015, Journal of safety research.

[48]  Hillel Bar-Gera,et al.  Evaluating the Effect of Enforcement on Speed Distributions Using Probe Vehicle Data , 2017 .

[49]  Kibrom A. Abay,et al.  Investigating the Nature and Impact of Reporting Bias in Road Crash Data , 2014 .

[50]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Utilizing UAV video data for in-depth analysis of drivers' crash risk at interchange merging areas. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[51]  Yong Wang,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of freeway crash casualty using high-resolution traffic data , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[52]  Yanyong Guo,et al.  Evaluating how right-turn treatments affect right-turn-on-red conflicts at signalized intersections , 2018, Journal of Transportation Safety & Security.

[53]  J. Robins,et al.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.