Open Innovation Projects in SMEs as an Engine for Sustainable Growth

Most innovation activities that are inevitable for sustainable growth are coordinated via research and development (R&D) projects, which can differ widely in terms of both project and open innovation characteristics, even when conducted within the same firm. Therefore, it is important to consider the peculiarities of R&D projects when evaluating the performance of open innovation strategies, as well as to explore how the benefits and costs of open innovation are shaped by cross-level interactions. This study identifies the differences between successful and unsuccessful open innovation projects, in both firm-level and project-level terms. We focus on small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which usually lack the full set of internal resources and competences required to effectively develop, produce, and commercialize their innovations, and thus must adopt open innovation approaches more actively for sustainability. Adopting an empirical approach, we conducted a survey of 517 Korean SMEs and analyzed 241 successful and unsuccessful open innovation projects in depth. By combining measurements at the firm and project levels, this study provides new insight into the intra-organizational challenges of implementing open innovation projects, which are not only helpful to strategic decision-makers in SMEs, but also to those who make policies for them.

[1]  L. Cricelli,et al.  ASSESSING THE OPEN INNOVATION TRENDS BY MEANS OF THE EUROSTAT COMMUNITY INNOVATION SURVEY , 2016 .

[2]  Chanwoo Cho,et al.  An Empirical Analysis on Purposes, Drivers and Activities of Technology Opportunity Discovery: The Case of Korean SMEs in the Manufacturing Sector , 2016 .

[3]  Joon Young Park,et al.  A Quantitative Study of Influencing Factors on Crowd Participation in a Crowdsourcing Project for Consumer Product Design , 2015 .

[4]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Antecedents of Open Innovation at the Project Level: Empirical Analysis of Korean Firms , 2015 .

[5]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Perceptual Factors Affecting the Tendency to Collaboration in SMEs: Perceived Importance of Collaboration Modes and Partners , 2015 .

[6]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners , 2014 .

[7]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  On the Management of Open Innovation , 2014 .

[8]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[9]  Cristina Rossi-Lamastra,et al.  Open innovation and within-industry diversification in small and medium enterprises: The case of open source software firms , 2014 .

[10]  M. Bogers,et al.  Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation , 2014 .

[11]  J. West,et al.  Open Innovation: The Next Decade , 2014 .

[12]  Helle Alsted Søndergaard,et al.  Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices , 2014 .

[13]  Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo,et al.  Different practices for open innovation: a context-based approach , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  C. Chou,et al.  The impact of open innovation on firm performance: The moderating effects of internal R&D and environmental turbulence , 2013 .

[15]  B. Looy,et al.  Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners , 2013 .

[16]  Nola Hewitt-Dundas,et al.  Catalysing open innovation through publicly-funded R&D: A comparison of university and company-based research centres , 2013 .

[17]  M. McAdam,et al.  Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: An overview , 2013 .

[18]  Nelli Theyel,et al.  Extending open innovation throughout the value chain by small and medium-sized manufacturers , 2013 .

[19]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[20]  Deli Yang.  Intellectual Property Management , 2012 .

[21]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going , 2012 .

[22]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Does open innovation improve the performance of R&D projects? , 2012 .

[23]  V. Parida,et al.  Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High‐Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance , 2012 .

[24]  M. Colombo,et al.  Introduction: Small Business and Networked Innovation: Organizational and Managerial Challenges , 2012 .

[25]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in UK business services , 2011 .

[26]  T. Minshall,et al.  How do large multinational companies implement open innovation , 2011 .

[27]  Hao-Chen Huang,et al.  Technological innovation capability creation potential of open innovation: a cross-level analysis in the biotechnology industry , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Diversity of Science Linkages: A Survey of Innovation Performance Effects and Some Evidence from Flemish Firms , 2010 .

[29]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model , 2010 .

[30]  S. Zeng,et al.  Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs , 2010 .

[31]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[32]  M. Colombo,et al.  Effects of International R&D Alliances on Performance of High-Tech Start-Ups: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2009 .

[33]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[34]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[35]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[36]  M. Danson.  Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies , 2007 .

[37]  武彦 福島.  持続可能性(Sustainability)の要件 , 2006 .

[38]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[39]  Tanya Menon,et al.  Tainted Knowledge vs. Tempting Knowledge: People Avoid Knowledge from Internal Rivals and Seek Knowledge from External Rivals , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[40]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[41]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda , 2006 .

[42]  Nola Hewitt-Dundas.  Resource and Capability Constraints to Innovation in Small and Large Plants , 2006 .

[43]  Nobuya Fukugawa,et al.  Determining Factors in Innovation of Small Firm Networks: A case of Cross Industry Groups in Japan , 2006 .

[44]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[45]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Firm-level Innovation Models: Perspectives on Research in Developed and Developing Countries , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[46]  H. J. Smith,et al.  The power of business models , 2005 .

[47]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[48]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  The Effect of General and Partner-Specific Alliance Experience on Joint R&D Project Performance , 2005 .

[49]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation , 2005 .

[50]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , 2004 .

[51]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[52]  Keith Chapman,et al.  Innovation, Collaboration, and Learning in Regional Clusters: A Study of SMEs in the Aberdeen Oil Complex , 2003 .

[53]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[54]  J. Hagedoorn.  Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[55]  Javier Revilla Diez,et al.  Metropolitan Innovation Systems: A Comparison between Barcelona, Stockholm, and Vienna , 2002 .

[56]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  R&D Strategy and Organisation:Managing Technical Change in Dynamic Contexts , 2001 .

[57]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[58]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[59]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[60]  Abdul-Hadi G. Abulrub,et al.  Open innovation management: challenges and prospects , 2012 .

[61]  E. Huizingh.  Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[62]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis , 2011 .

[63]  A. Gillison,et al.  Research Partnerships , 2007 .

[64]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[65]  Kwanghui Lim,et al.  The many faces of absorptive capacity : spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips , 2000 .