Pembrolizumab in Asian patients with microsatellite‐instability‐high/mismatch‐repair‐deficient colorectal cancer

The phase 3 KEYNOTE‐177 study evaluated pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab in patients with newly diagnosed, microsatellite‐instability‐high (MSI‐H)/mismatch‐repair‐deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Primary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety. Here, we report results from the post hoc analysis of patients who were enrolled in Asia from the final analysis (FA) of KEYNOTE‐177. A total of 48 patients from Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan (pembrolizumab, n = 22; chemotherapy, n = 26) were included. At FA, median time from randomization to data cutoff (February 19, 2021) was 45.3 (range 38.1–57.8) months with pembrolizumab and 43.9 (range 36.6–55.1) months with chemotherapy. Median PFS was not reached (NR; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 months–NR) with pembrolizumab versus 10.4 (95% CI 6.3–22.0) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.26–1.20). Median OS was NR (range 13.8 months–NR) versus 30.0 (14.7–NR) months (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.27–1.55) and ORR was 50% (95% CI 28–72) versus 46% (95% CI 27–67). Grade 3/4 treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported by two patients (9%) in the pembrolizumab arm and 20 (80%) in the chemotherapy arm. Immune‐mediated adverse events or infusion reactions were reported by six patients (27%) and 10 patients (40%), respectively. No deaths due to TRAEs occurred. These data support first‐line pembrolizumab as a standard of care for patients from Asia with MSI‐H/dMMR mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02563002.

[1]  P. Gibbs,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer (KEYNOTE-177): final analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. , 2022, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  Honglang Li,et al.  Metastatic patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage IV colon cancer: A population‐based analysis , 2019, Cancer medicine.

[4]  T. H. Nguyen,et al.  The global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2019, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[5]  G. Lesinski,et al.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of MSI-H/MMR-D colorectal cancer and a perspective on resistance mechanisms , 2019, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  L. Diaz,et al.  Pembrolizumab (pembro) in Mismatch Repair-Deficient (dMMR) Advanced Colorectal Cancer (CRC): KEYNOTE-164 Japan Subgroup , 2019, Annals of Oncology.

[7]  Han-Mo Chiu,et al.  The Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, Screening, and Management , 2019, Current Gastroenterology Reports.

[8]  Prashanth Rawla,et al.  Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors , 2019, Przeglad gastroenterologiczny.

[9]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Durable Responses on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Other Systemic Therapies: A Pooled Analysis of Phase III Trials. , 2018, JCO precision oncology.

[10]  W. Barry,et al.  Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction Following the Use of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[11]  J. Desai,et al.  Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Ludmila V. Danilova,et al.  Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockade , 2017, Science.

[13]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  J. Tabernero,et al.  Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO–ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.