Flexible Resource Allocation for the Detection of Changing Visual Features

Failure to detect change under circumstances where visual input is interrupted or attention is distracted is indicative of the capacity limits of visual short-term memory. The current study attempts to probe the nature of these limits. In experiment 1, the appearance of single Gabor patches was altered across colour, size, or speed, and set size was manipulated by means of a visual cue. In experiment 2, performance for detecting single and multiple changes to Gabor patches was compared under the constraint that the inherent detectability of each individual change was the same. Experiment 1 yielded a particular set size (4) and a particular level of change magnitude at which performance was equivalent across change type. On the basis of these parameter values, experiment 2 revealed that the detectability of two features changing within one object was the same as the detectability of a single feature changing across two objects, and that this level of detectability could be predicted by a simple model of probability summation. Together, these results suggest that performance is determined by the magnitude of featural changes independently of the way they are distributed across objects. We suggest they are adequately explained by a flexible-resource-allocation model rather than a slot-allocation model.

[1]  A. Baddeley.  Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Michael S. Ambinder,et al.  Change blindness , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  H. Orbach,et al.  Contrast discrimination, non–uniform patterns and change blindness , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Ronald A. Rensink.  The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[5]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[6]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Visual short term memory , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[8]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Limitations of object-based feature encoding in visual short-term memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Capacity limits in the detection and identification of change have implications for models of visual short term memory , 2010 .

[11]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Multidimensional encoding of visual form , 1972 .

[12]  M. Lévesque.  Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[13]  J. Grimes.  On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[14]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[16]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[17]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Limitations on the Parallel Guidance of Visual Search : Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation Conjuctions , 2004 .

[19]  J. Palmer.  Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[20]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Ronald A. Rensink.  Failure to see more than one change at a time , 2010 .

[23]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[24]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[25]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  W. A. Phillips.  On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[27]  Tobias E. Reisbeck,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(97)00240-X , 2003 .

[28]  J. Duncan.  Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: Dimensions and objects , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[30]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Competition and sharing of processing resources in visual discrimination. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.