Human and automated assessment of oral reading fluency.

This article describes a comprehensive approach to fully automated assessment of children’s oral reading fluency (ORF), one of the most informative and frequently administered measures of children’s reading ability. Speech recognition and machine learning techniques are described that model the 3 components of oral reading fluency: word accuracy, reading rate, and expressiveness. These techniques are integrated into a computer program that produces estimates of these components during a child’s 1-min reading of a grade-level text. The ability of the program to produce accurate assessments was evaluated on a corpus of 783 one-min recordings of 313 students reading grade-leveled passages without assistance. Established standardized metrics of accuracy and rate (words correct per minute [WCPM]) and expressiveness (National Assessment of Educational Progress Expressiveness scale) were used to compare ORF estimates produced by expert human scorers and automatically generated ratings. Experimental results showed that the proposed techniques produced WCPM scores that were within 3–4 words of human scorers across students in different grade levels and schools. The results also showed that computer-generated ratings of expressive reading agreed with human raters better than the human raters agreed with each other. The results of the study indicate that computer-generated ORF assessments produce an accurate multidimensional estimate of children’s oral reading ability that approaches agreement among human scorers. The implications of these results for future research and near term benefits to teachers and students are discussed.

[1]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[3]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[4]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[5]  Mary E. Curtis,et al.  Development of Components of Reading Skill. , 1980 .

[6]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  The simple view of reading , 1990 .

[8]  Donald L. Compton,et al.  Speed of word recognition as a distinguishing characteristic of reading disabilities , 1994 .

[9]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Large Margin DAGs for Multiclass Classification , 1999, NIPS.

[10]  Maryanne Wolf,et al.  What time may tell: Towards a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia , 1999 .

[11]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[12]  Michelle K. Hosp,et al.  Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis , 2001 .

[13]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Evaluation of an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens: Comparison to Human Tutoring and Classroom Instruction , 2003 .

[14]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency. , 2003 .

[15]  Elmar Nöth,et al.  "Of all things the measure is man" automatic classification of emotions and inter-labeler consistency [speech-based emotion recognition] , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[16]  Roland H. Good,et al.  Story retell: A fluency-based indicator of reading comprehension , 2005 .

[17]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Using CBM as an Indicator of Decoding, Word Reading, and Comprehension: Do the Relations Change With Grade? , 2005 .

[18]  G. Tindal,et al.  Oral Reading Fluency Norms: A Valuable Assessment Tool for Reading Teachers , 2006 .

[19]  Paula J Schwanenflugel,et al.  Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. , 2006, Reading research quarterly.

[20]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  Are Fluency Measures Accurate Predictors of Reading Achievement? , 2007, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  Ronald A. Cole,et al.  Highly accurate children's speech recognition for interactive reading tutors using subword units , 2007, Speech Commun..

[22]  Teri Wallace,et al.  Literature Synthesis on Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading , 2007 .

[23]  Paula J Schwanenflugel,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children. , 2008, Reading research quarterly.

[24]  Alysia D. Roehrig,et al.  Accuracy of the DIBELS oral reading fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. , 2008, Journal of school psychology.

[25]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Estimation of children's reading ability by fusion of automatic pronunciation verification and fluency detection , 2008, INTERSPEECH.

[26]  Timothy V. Rasinski,et al.  Reading Fluency: More Than Automaticity? More Than a Concern for the Primary Grades? , 2009 .

[27]  Melanie R. Kuhn,et al.  Review of Research: Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency , 2010 .

[28]  C. Schatschneider,et al.  Does Growth Rate in Oral Reading Fluency Matter in Predicting Reading Comprehension Achievement , 2010 .

[29]  Rebekah George Benjamin,et al.  Text Complexity and Oral Reading Prosody in Young Readers , 2010 .

[30]  Dimitra Vergyri,et al.  Automatic speech recognition of multiple accented English data , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[31]  Jack Mostow,et al.  Two methods for assessing oral reading prosody , 2011, TSLP.

[32]  Ronald A. Cole,et al.  FLORA: Fluent oral reading assessment of children's speech , 2011, TSLP.

[33]  Daniel Bolaños The Bavieca open-source speech recognition toolkit , 2012, 2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT).

[34]  Ronald A. Cole,et al.  Automatic assessment of expressive oral reading , 2013, Speech Commun..