Periprosthetic changes in bone mineral density in 5 stem designs 5 years after cemented total hip arthroplasty. No relation to stem migration.
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Wood | B. Nivbrant | Ming Li | S. Rohrl
[1] C. Engh,et al. Clinical Consequences of Stress Shielding After Porous-Coated Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[2] J. Jurvelin,et al. Monitoring of Periprosthetic BMD After Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty with Dual‐Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry—a 3‐Year Follow‐Up Study , 2001, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[3] Naoto Saito,et al. Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty , 2000, The Lancet.
[4] S. Gnudi,et al. Loss of bone mass after total hip replacement: preliminary data. , 1998, La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento.
[5] N. Sugano,et al. Longitudinal Evaluation of Time Related Bone Remodeling After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[6] L Cristofolini,et al. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. , 1997, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.
[7] R. Huiskes,et al. Failed innovation in total hip replacement. Diagnosis and proposals for a cure. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.