Biomechanical analysis of second-generation headless compression screws.

INTRODUCTION Headless Compression Screws (HCS) are commonly utilized for the fixation of small bone and articular fractures. Recently several new second generation HCS (SG-HCS) have been introduced with the purported benefits of improved biomechanical characteristics. We sought to determine and compare the biomechanical efficiencies of these screws. MATERIAL AND METHODS Five HCS including four second generation (Mini-Acutrak 2 (Acumed), Twinfix (Stryker), Kompressor Mini (Integra), HCS 3.0 (Synthes)) and one first generation (Herbert-Whipple) were studied. Polyurethane foam blocks that represented osteoporotic cancellous bone (0.16 g/cc) with a simulated transverse fracture at the waist were utilized and five screws of each brand were tested for the generated compression force and fastening torque during insertion with and without pre-drilling. RESULTS The generated compression force was highest for Mini-Acutrak 2 (45.41 ± 0.88 N) and lowest for Herbert-Whipple (13.44 ± 2.35 N) and forces of Twinfix, Kompressor Mini, HCS 3.0 were in between in descending order. The compression force of SG-HCS increased slightly without pre-drilling but it was not statistically significant while the fastening torque increased significantly. Slight over-fastening beyond the recommended stage significantly reduced the compression force in Twinfix and Kompressor and had no or moderate effect in other screws. CONCLUSION All SG-HCS demonstrated greater biomechanical characteristics than the first generation Herbert-Whipple screw. The Mini-Acutrak 2 with a variable pitch design generated the maximum compression force and showed the most reliability and sustainability. Screws with independently rotating trailing heads (Twinfix and Kompressor Mini) demonstrated loss of compression with extra turns. The increase of fastening torque due to over-fastening and loss of compression at the same time in some screw designs, demonstrated how the fastening torque (applied by the surgeon) can be a misleading measure of the compression force. Application of SG-HCS in osteoporotic bone without pre-drilling can slightly increase the compression force.

[1]  P. Rommens,et al.  Screw fixation of radial head fractures: compression screw versus lag screw--a biomechanical comparison. , 2010, Injury.

[2]  A. Gutow.  Percutaneous Fixation of Scaphoid Fractures , 2007, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[3]  M. Easley,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of screws and plates for hallux valgus opening-wedge and Ludloff osteotomies. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  A Sarmiento,et al.  Fracture healing in rat femora as affected by functional weight-bearing. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  H. Oflaz,et al.  A biomechanical study on preloaded compression effect on headless screws , 2009, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[6]  A. Weiland,et al.  Acute fractures of the scaphoid. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  I. Lo,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Intrascaphoid Compression Using the 3.00 mm Synthes Cannulated Screw and Threaded Washer: an in vitro Cadaveric Study , 2001, Journal of hand surgery.

[8]  W. Mayr,et al.  Interfragmentary compression forces of scaphoid screws in a sawbone cylinder model. , 2007, Injury.

[9]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Interfragmentary compression across a simulated scaphoid fracture--analysis of 3 screws. , 2004, The Journal of hand surgery.

[10]  H. Rosen.  Compression treatment of long bone pseudarthroses. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  T. Herbert,et al.  Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  R M Harrington,et al.  Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  A. Ilyas,et al.  Headless compression screw fixation of scaphoid fractures. , 2010, Hand clinics.

[14]  I. Lo,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Intrascaphoid Compression Using the Herbert Scaphoid Screw System , 1998, Journal of hand surgery.

[15]  C. Kelly,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a New Composite Bioresorbable Screw , 2006, Journal of hand surgery.

[16]  E. Chao,et al.  External skeletal fixation of canine tibial osteotomies. Compression compared with no compression. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  H. Moriya,et al.  Herbert screw fixation of capitellar fractures. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  S. Goldstein.  The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  S. Evans,et al.  Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal? , 2010, Injury.

[20]  E. Wolfs,et al.  Animal experiments to examine the histology of fracture healing in osteosynthesis with external fixation and compression , 2004, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery.

[21]  A. Miles,et al.  Compression forces generated by Mini bone screws--a comparative study done on bone model. , 2005, Injury.