Tube hydroforming (THF) is an advanced metal forming process that is used widely in automotive industry, but the application of the THF process in aerospace field is comparatively new with many challenges due to high strength and limited formability of aerospace materials. The success of THF process largely depends on many factors, such as mechanical properties of the material, loading path during the process, tool geometry and friction condition. Due to complexity of this process, finite element modeling (FEM) can largely reduce the production cost. One of the important input in FEM is the material behavior during hydroforming process. The true stress-strain curve before necking can be easily determined, using either tensile testing or bulge testing, but for an accurate failure prediction in a large deformation, such as hydroforming, the study of true stress-strain curve after necking is important because it improves the quality of the analysis due to utilizing a real extended stress-strain curve. Hence, the objective of this research was to establish a methodology to determine the true stress-strain curve after necking in order to predict burst pressure in the THF of aerospace materials. Uniaxial tensile tests were performed on standard tensile samples (ASME E8M-04) to determine the true stress-strain before and after necking, using an analytical method presented in this study. To validate the approach, burst pressure in the THF process was predicted using the extended stress-strain curve in conjunction with Brozzo's decoupled fracture model. The approach was evaluated using data obtained from the free expansion (tube bulging) tests performed on stainless steel 321 tubes with 2 inches diameter and two different thicknesses, 0.9 mm and 1.2 mm. The comparison of the predicted and measured burst pressures was promising, indicating that the approach has the potential to be extended to predict formability limits in THF of complex shapes.
[1]
Zhen Li,et al.
Numerical analysis of the stress-strain curve and fracture initiation for ductile material
,
1994
.
[2]
Percy Williams Bridgman,et al.
Studies in large plastic flow and fracture
,
1964
.
[3]
Boris Štok,et al.
COMPUTER-AIDED IDENTIFICATION OF THE YIELD CURVE OF A SHEET METAL AFTER ONSET OF NECKING
,
2004
.
[4]
Dimitri Debruyne,et al.
Identification of the post-necking hardening behaviour of sheet metal by comparison of the internal and external work in the necking zone
,
2011
.
[5]
Dimitri Debruyne,et al.
Elasto-plastic material parameter identification by inverse methods: Calculation of the sensitivity matrix
,
2007
.
[6]
O. Sherby,et al.
Large strain deformation of polycrystalline metals at low homologous temperatures
,
1975
.
[7]
Christian Thaulow,et al.
Determining material true stress–strain curve from tensile specimens with rectangular cross-section
,
1999
.
[8]
Y. Ling,et al.
Uniaxial True Stress-Strain after Necking
,
2004
.
[9]
A. Korhonen,et al.
Forming and fracture limits of austenitic stainless steel sheets
,
2008
.