Value Capture for Transportation Finance: Technical Research Report

As vehicles become more fuel-efficient and overall levels of travel stagnate in response to increases in fuel prices, conventional sources of revenue for transportation finance such as taxes on motor fuels have been put under increasing pressure. One potential alternative as a source of revenue is a set of policies collectively referred to as value capture policies. In contrast to fuel taxes and other instruments that impose charges on users of transportation networks, value capture policies seek to generate revenue by extracting a portion of the gains in the value of land that result from improvements to transportation networks. In this report the authors identify a set of eight policies that contain elements of the value capture approach. These policies include land value taxes, tax increment financing, special assessments, transportation utility fees, development impact fees, negotiated exactions, joint development, and air rights. Each of the policies is evaluated according to four criteria: 1) efficiency, which relates to how well the policies allocate scarce resources, 2) equity, which describes the fairness of resource allocation among different strata of society, 3) sustainability, which refers to the ability of the policy to serve as an adequate, reliable source of transportation revenue, and 4) feasibility, which refers to the degree of political and administrative difficulty associated with each policy. Since these policies are targeted toward use at the state and local level in Minnesota, the authors conclude by examining some legal and administrative issues related to the implementation of each policy with special reference to Minnesota.

[1]  H. Spencer Banzhaf,et al.  Can the Land Tax Help Curb Urban Sprawl? Evidence from Growth Patterns in Pennsylvania , 2010 .

[2]  R. Roberts,et al.  Moderating Urban Sprawl through Land Value Taxation , 2008 .

[3]  Jeffery J. Smith,et al.  Financing Transit Systems through Value Capture: An Annotated Bibliography , 2006 .

[4]  Yves Zenou,et al.  Property Tax and Urban Sprawl: Theory and Implications for U.S. Cities , 2005 .

[5]  R. England,et al.  Assessing the Distributive Impact of a Revenue—Neutral Shift from a Uniform Property Tax to a Two-Rate Property Tax with a Uniform Credit , 2005, National Tax Journal.

[6]  Rick Rybeck Using Value Capture to Finance Infrastructure and Encourage Compact Development , 2004 .

[7]  Kangoh Lee Should land and capital be taxed at a uniform rate , 2003 .

[8]  J. Brueckner,et al.  Urban Sprawl and the Property Tax , 2003 .

[9]  T. Nechyba PROSPECTS FOR LAND RENT TAXES IN STATE AND LOCAL TAX REFORMS , 2002 .

[10]  H. Batt Value Capture as a Policy Tool in Transportation Economics: An Exploration in Public Finance in the Tradition of Henry George , 2001 .

[11]  D. Riley,et al.  Taken for a ride. , 2002, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[12]  T. N. Tideman,et al.  A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis of the Effect of Two-Rate Property Taxes on Construction☆ , 2000 .

[13]  R. V. Andelson Land-value taxation around the world , 2000 .

[14]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Rent Capitalization and Transportation Infrastructure Development in Jakarta , 1999 .

[15]  G. Stacy Sirmans,et al.  Mass Transportation, Apartment Rent and Property Values , 1997 .

[16]  Alanna Hartzok Pennsylvania's Success with Local Property Tax Reform: The Split Rate Tax , 1997 .

[17]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  THE IMPACT OF URBAN LAND TAXATION: THE PITTSBURGH EXPERIENCE , 1997, National Tax Journal.

[18]  Steven C. Bourassa Economic Effects of Taxes on Land , 1992 .

[19]  Steven C. Bourassa Land Value Taxation and Housing Development , 1990 .

[20]  J. DiMasi THE EFFECTS OF SITE VALUE TAXATION IN AN URBAN AREA: A GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH , 1987, National Tax Journal.

[21]  Steven C. Bourassa Land value taxation and new housing development in Pittsburgh , 1987 .

[22]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  A MODERN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF SITE VALUE TAXATION , 1984, National Tax Journal.

[23]  M. Edwards Site Value Taxation on Australia , 1984 .

[24]  Steven B. Cord Taxing Land More than Buildings: The Record in Pennsylvania , 1983 .

[25]  Charles Zech,et al.  The Economic Effects of Land Value Taxation , 1982 .

[26]  T. Tideman A TAX ON LAND VALUE IS NEUTRAL , 1982, National Tax Journal.

[27]  D. Ervin,et al.  Windfalls for Wipeouts: Land Value Capture and Compensation , 1979 .

[28]  B. Bentick The Impact of Taxation and Valuation Practices on the Timing and Efficiency of Land Use , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  A. Skouras The Non-Neutrality of Land Taxation , 1978 .

[30]  D. Shoup,et al.  The Effect of Shifting the Property Tax Base from Improvement Value to Land Value: An Empirical Estimate , 1977 .

[31]  C. Sharpe VALUE CAPTURE AND JOINT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS: CHICAGO/LOUISVILLE/LOS ANGELES , 1977 .

[32]  W. Oates The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  James E. Wert,et al.  An analysis of the potential effects of a movement toward a land value based property tax : case study of a possible application of Public law 299 Pennsylvania 1951 to Bethlehem, Pennsylvania , 1958 .

[34]  H. G. Brown The Ethics of Land-Value Taxation , 1917, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  H. George The Land Question: What It Involves, and How Alone It Can Be Settled , 1884 .

[36]  H. George Progress and poverty , 1879 .