Dispersion, aberration and deconvolution in multi‐wavelength fluorescence images

The wavelength dependence of the incoherent point spread function in a wide‐field microscope was investigated experimentally. Dispersion in the sample and optics can lead to significant changes in the point spread function as wavelength is varied over the range commonly used in fluorescence microscopy. For a given sample, optical conditions can generally be optimized to produce a point spread function largely free of spherical aberration at a given wavelength. Unfortunately, deviations in wavelength from this value will result in spherically aberrated point spread functions. Therefore, when multiple fluorophores are used to localize different components in the same sample, the image of the distribution of at least one of the fluorophores will be spherically aberrated. This aberration causes a loss of intensity and resolution, thereby complicating the localization and analysis of multiple components in a multi‐wavelength image. We show that optimal resolution can be restored to a spherically aberrated image by constrained, iterative deconvolution, as long as the spherical aberration in the point spread function used for deconvolution matches the aberration in the image reasonably well. The success of this method is essentially independent of the initial degree of spherical aberration in the image. Deconvolution of many biological images can be achieved by collecting a small library of spherically aberrated and unaberrated point spread functions, and then choosing a point spread function appropriate for deconvolving each image. The co‐localization and relative intensities of multiple components can then be accurately studied in a multi‐wavelength image.

[1]  P. Shaw,et al.  Three‐dimensional optical microscopy using tilted views , 1990, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  David A. Agard,et al.  Solution of Toeplitz systems for the restoration of 3-D optical-sectioning microscopy data , 1990, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[3]  D A Agard,et al.  Temporal and spatial coordination of chromosome movement, spindle formation, and nuclear envelope breakdown during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster embryos , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  D. Agard,et al.  Structural studies of a membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  F S Fay,et al.  Three‐dimensional molecular distribution in single cells analysed using the digital imaging microscope , 1989, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  Marcus J. Grote,et al.  The Collection, Processing, and Display of Digital Three-Dimensional Images of Biological Specimens , 1995 .

[7]  Lawrence M. Lifshitz,et al.  Coupling of the Na+/Ca2+exchanger, Na+/K+ pump and sarcoplasmic reticulum in smooth muscle , 1993, Nature.

[8]  S. Terakawa Video Microscopy , 1985, Tanpakushitsu kakusan koso. Protein, nucleic acid, enzyme.

[9]  J. Swedlow,et al.  Three-dimensional multiple-wavelength fluorescence microscopy for the structural analysis of biological phenomena. , 1991, Seminars in cell biology.

[10]  F S Fay,et al.  Imaging in five dimensions: time-dependent membrane potentials in individual mitochondria. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[11]  D. Agard,et al.  Determination of three-dimensional imaging properties of a light microscope system. Partial confocal behavior in epifluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[12]  W. Reeves Royal Microscopical Society , 1873, Nature.

[13]  B Willis,et al.  Iterative, constrained 3‐D image reconstruction of transmitted light bright‐field micrographs based on maximum likelihood estimation , 1993, Journal of microscopy.

[14]  D. Rawlins,et al.  The point‐spread function of a confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution of 3‐D data , 1991 .

[15]  W. A. Carrington Image restoration in 3-D microscopy with limited data , 1990, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[16]  S. Gibson,et al.  Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  D. Agard,et al.  Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions. , 1989, Methods in cell biology.

[18]  S. Gibson,et al.  Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  B. Frieden MAXIMUM ATTAINABLE MTF FOR ROTATIONALLY SYMMETRIC LENS SYSTEMS , 1969 .

[20]  J. Conchello,et al.  Enhanced 3-D reconstruction from confocal scanning microscope images. 1: Deterministic and maximum likelihood reconstructions. , 1990, Applied optics.

[21]  D. Agard Optical sectioning microscopy: cellular architecture in three dimensions. , 1984, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[22]  W. Denk,et al.  Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. , 1990, Science.

[23]  D. Agard,et al.  A three-dimensional structural dissection of Drosophila polytene chromosomes , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[25]  S. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index , 1993 .