Variation in mate preference across a house mouse hybrid zone

Reproductive character displacement is known to occur at the borders of a secondary contact zone between the two European subspecies of the house mouse (in Jutland, Denmark), where selection against hybridization occurs. This study assessed patterns of mate preference in naturally occurring hybrids of the two subspecies. Mate odour choice was investigated in male and female mice sampled across the hybrid zone. Odour samples comprised urine (from the opposite sex to the test animal) obtained from populations geographically distant from the hybrid zone. Urine is known to carry subspecies recognition signals. The behavioural results changed across the hybrid zone, and were analysed by a model of clinal variation. This behavioural cline was compared with the allozyme cline across the same hybrid zone. Males on both sides of the hybrid zone showed an assortative preference, which shifted significantly and abruptly ∼10 km from the genetic centre of the hybrid zone on the Mus musculus musculus side. Directional preference was not detected in females, which could relate to variation in sexual receptivity. Our model indicates that the peculiar pattern of male preference could involve several genes and be characterized by mild to strong epistasis favouring the expression of M. m. domesticus-like preference over a large portion of the hybrid zone. This study may provide the first picture of the genetic determination of mate preference in a mammal.

[1]  P. Boursot,et al.  Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids , 2005 .

[2]  J. Piálek,et al.  GENETIC ANALYSIS OF AUTOSOMAL AND X-LINKED MARKERS ACROSS A MOUSE HYBRID ZONE , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  P. Sherman,et al.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  Zuleyma Tang-Martinez,et al.  The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[5]  O. V. Helversen,et al.  Complex courtship in a bimodal grasshopper hybrid zone , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  J. Hurst.  Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus rutty. II. Communication between females , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  T. Hatfield,et al.  Genetic Divergence in Adaptive Characters Between Sympatric Species of Stickleback , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[8]  G. Heth,et al.  Preferences of newborn mice for odours indicating closer genetic relatedness: is experience necessary? , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  J. Rosenfield,et al.  Sexual selection promotes hybridization between Pecos pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis and sheepshead minnow, C. variegatus , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[10]  M. Braun,et al.  Mate preference: a possible causal mechanism for a moving hybrid zone , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  P. Boursot,et al.  Testing for selection on the androgen‐binding protein in the Danish mouse hybrid zone , 2005 .

[12]  P. Boursot,et al.  L'espèce polytipique Mus musculus en Transcaucasie , 1996 .

[13]  G. Ganem,et al.  Assessment of mate preference in the house mouse with reference to investigations on assortative mating , 2005 .

[14]  L. C. Drickamer.  Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  L. C. Drickamer,et al.  Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Extinction by hybridization and introgression , 1996 .

[17]  M. Noor,et al.  Evidence for a One-Allele Assortative Mating Locus , 2005, Science.

[18]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  Wormy mice in a hybrid zone: A genetic control of susceptibility to parasite infection , 1991 .

[19]  S. Krackow,et al.  Mate Choice for Non-siblings in Wild House Mice: Evidence from a Choice Test and a Reproductive Test , 2010 .

[20]  G. Heth,et al.  Genetic relatedness assessment through individual odour similarities in mice , 2003 .

[21]  D. Dewsbury,et al.  Ejaculate Cost and Male Choice , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[22]  C. Smadja,et al.  Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone , 2002 .

[23]  Leonore A Herzenberg,et al.  Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[24]  S. Chenoweth,et al.  Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  N. Barton,et al.  Analysis of Hybrid Zones , 1985 .

[26]  J. Hurst.  Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus rutty. I. Communication between males , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  C. Baudoin,et al.  Olfactory preferences in two strains of wild mice, Mus musculus musculus andMus musculus domesticus, and their hybrids , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  M. Nachman,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL PATTERNS OF INTROGRESSION ACROSS THE X CHROMOSOME IN A HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN TWO SPECIES OF HOUSE MICE , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  C. Smadja,et al.  Asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in the house mouse , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  C. Laukaitis,et al.  SALIVARY ANDROGEN‐BINDING PROTEIN (ABP) MEDIATES SEXUAL ISOLATION IN MUS MUSCULUS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  J. Piálek,et al.  The role of salivary androgen-binding protein in reproductive isolation between two subspecies of house mouse: Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus , 2005 .

[32]  C. Smadja,et al.  Divergence of Odorant Signals within and between the Two European Subspecies of the House Mouse , 2007 .

[33]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF HOUSE MICE , 1993 .

[34]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Free female choice in house mice: Leaving best for last , 2003 .

[35]  M. Ryan,et al.  SPECIES RECOGNITION AND SEXUAL SELECTION AS A UNITARY PROBLEM IN ANIMAL COMMUNICATION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  Inferences of selection and migration in the Danish house mouse hybrid zone , 2005 .

[37]  C. Smadja,et al.  Strong premating divergence in a unimodal hybrid zone between two subspecies of the house mouse , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[38]  G. A. Oortmerssen,et al.  Frontier disputes between the West- and East-European house mouse in Schleswig-Holstein, West Germany , 1980 .

[39]  W. Potts,et al.  Untrained mice discriminate MHC-determined odors , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[40]  L. C. Drickamer,et al.  Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  William E. Wagner.  Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  David M. Lambert,et al.  Speciation and the recognition concept : theory and application , 1995 .