Estimation of absorbed PAR across Scandinavia from satellite measurements. Part II: Modeling and evaluating the fractional absorption

The aim of this study is to generate a quality-controlled sub-kilometer dataset of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) across Scandinavia from satellite. FAPAR is required for estimating the amount of PAR absorbed (APAR) by vegetation, which in turn allows for estimation of carbon uptake. In this study, FAPAR was modeled from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) which was obtained from the MODIS VI product (MOD13Q1) at 250 m spatial resolution. Modeled FAPAR was evaluated against in-situ measurements of fractional interception of PAR (FIPAR) and FAPAR at nine plots in six forested sites across Sweden and Denmark from 2001 to 2005. High resolution remote sensing data were used to investigate the representativeness of the measurement areas. Furthermore, FAPAR from the MODIS LAI/FPAR product at 1 km spatial resolution (MOD15A2) was investigated and compared the measured and modeled FAPAR. There was good agreement between modeled and measured FAPAR (6.9% average RMSE of the means). A linear relationship between daily values of NDVI and FAPAR was found (R 2 =0.82), and it is concluded that seasonally adjusted NDVI can be used for accurate FAPAR estimations over forested areas in Scandinavia. However, it was found that the error was correlated with average FAPAR and that it is important to take the understory vegetation into account when measuring FAPAR in open canopies. The observed difference between FIPAR and FAPAR was 2.3 and 1.4 percentage units for coniferous and deciduous stands, respectively. MODIS FAPAR performed well although a few unrealistic values were present, highlighting the necessity to filter out low quality values using the quality-control datasets.

[1]  Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro,et al.  Fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by Amazon tropical forest: A comparison of field measurements, modeling, and remote sensing , 2005 .

[2]  H. Smith,et al.  Plants and the daylight spectrum. , 1981 .

[3]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[4]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Ecological Remote Sensing at OTTER: Satellite Macroscale Observations , 1994 .

[5]  R. Fensholt,et al.  Evaluation of MODIS LAI, fAPAR and the relation between fAPAR and NDVI in a semi-arid environment using in situ measurements , 2004 .

[6]  Martin Heimann,et al.  Global and hemispheric CO2 sinks deduced from changes in atmospheric O2 concentration , 1996, Nature.

[7]  Per Jönsson,et al.  TIMESAT - a program for analyzing time-series of satellite sensor data , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[8]  Graham Russell,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: Contents , 1989 .

[9]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  A multi-scale analysis of dynamic optical signals in a Southern California chaparral ecosystem: A comparison of field, AVIRIS and MODIS data , 2004 .

[10]  G. Asrar,et al.  Estimating Absorbed Photosynthetic Radiation and Leaf Area Index from Spectral Reflectance in Wheat1 , 1984 .

[11]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A Directional Multispectral Forest Reflectance Model , 2000 .

[12]  B. Holben.  Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data , 1986 .

[13]  G. Russell,et al.  Plant Canopies: Their Growth, Form and Function: Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth , 1989 .

[14]  Bhaskar J. Choudhury,et al.  Relationships between vegetation indices, radiation absorption, and net photosynthesis evaluated by a sensitivity analysis , 1987 .

[15]  Louis Moreau,et al.  A new approach for remote sensing of canopy absorbed photosynthetically active radiation. II : Proportion of canopy absorption , 1996 .

[16]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Canopy architecture and remote sensing of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by boreal conifer forests , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[18]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  Investigating modelled and observed Terra/MODIS 500-m reflectance data for viewing and illumination effects , 2007 .

[19]  W. Cohen,et al.  Site‐level evaluation of satellite‐based global terrestrial gross primary production and net primary production monitoring , 2005 .

[20]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance : success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE , 1992 .

[21]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Modeling gross primary production of temperate deciduous broadleaf forest using satellite images and climate data , 2004 .

[22]  Per Jönsson,et al.  Seasonality extraction by function fitting to time-series of satellite sensor data , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  N. Jensen,et al.  Two years of continuous CO2 eddy-flux measurements over a Danish beech forest , 2001 .

[24]  S. Running,et al.  Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active , 1998 .

[25]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): land remote sensing for global change research , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[26]  Patrick E. Van Laake,et al.  Mapping PAR using MODIS atmosphere products , 2005 .

[27]  Angela Lundberg,et al.  Continuous long-term measurements of soil-plant-atmosphere variables at a forest site , 1999 .

[28]  R. Myneni,et al.  On the relationship between FAPAR and NDVI , 1994 .

[29]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[30]  T. W. Berge,et al.  Modelling biomass and leaf area index in a sub-arctic Scandinavian mountain area , 2004 .

[31]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Intercepted photosynthetically active radiation estimated by spectral reflectance , 1984 .

[32]  C. Tucker,et al.  A Global 9-yr Biophysical Land Surface Dataset from NOAA AVHRR Data , 2000 .

[33]  S. Running,et al.  Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data , 2002 .

[34]  J. Monteith.  SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[35]  A. Huete,et al.  Comparison of vegetation index compositing scenarios: BRDF versus maximum VI approaches , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[36]  W. Larcher.  Physiological Plant Ecology: Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups , 1995 .

[37]  C. Justice,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part II: The Generation of Global Fields of Terrestrial Biophysical Parameters from Satellite Data , 1996 .

[38]  J. Chen.  Evaluation of Vegetation Indices and a Modified Simple Ratio for Boreal Applications , 1996 .

[39]  C. Justice,et al.  The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from the NDVI , 1994 .

[40]  I. Fung,et al.  Observational Contrains on the Global Atmospheric Co2 Budget , 1990, Science.

[41]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  Net primary production and light use efficiency in a mixed coniferous forest in Sweden , 2005 .

[42]  A. Huete,et al.  MODIS Vegetation Index Compositing Approach: A Prototype with AVHRR Data , 1999 .

[43]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[44]  A. S. Belward,et al.  A new SPOT4-VEGETATION derived land cover map of Northern Eurasia , 2003 .

[45]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  A forest canopy reflectance model and a test case , 1991 .

[46]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  The impact of gridding artifacts on the local spatial properties of MODIS data : Implications for validation, compositing, and band-to-band registration across resolutions , 2006 .

[47]  Alfredo Huete,et al.  Effects of standing litter on the biophysical interpretation of plant canopies with spectral indices , 1996 .

[48]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Time‐series validation of MODIS land biophysical products in a Kalahari woodland, Africa , 2005 .

[49]  E. Vermote,et al.  Investigation of Product Accuracy as a Function of Input and Model Uncertainties: Case Study with Se , 2001 .

[50]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Remote sensing of solar radiation absorbed and reflected by vegetated land surfaces , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[51]  E. Davidson,et al.  Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest , 2004 .

[52]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[53]  S. Goward,et al.  Vegetation canopy PAR absorptance and the normalized difference vegetation index - An assessment using the SAIL model , 1992 .

[54]  Patrick E. Van Laake,et al.  Estimation of absorbed PAR across Scandinavia from satellite measurements : Part I: Incident PAR , 2007 .

[55]  M. Iqbal.  An introduction to solar radiation , 1983 .

[56]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  Estimating LAI in deciduous forest stands , 2005 .